Preview

Legal vs Imorral

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
464 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Legal vs Imorral
Bioethics Paper Topic 1
Legal vs. Immoral / Illegal vs. Moral

There are many things in this world that are legal but truly immoral. These are laws that we have to abide by but we may not actually agree with it for various reasons. There are also things in this world that are illegal but could be the morally right thing to do.
Euthanasia is legal but is it immoral? Probably most of us have had experiences with friends or relatives who suffered greatly towards the end of their lives. In my opinion, there are limits to how far modern medicine can go alleviating this pain. I believe that euthanasia is morally wrong. The problem with this is that it puts happiness vs. suffering ahead of life itself. Arguments in favor of euthanasia seem to imply that life is only worth living if one is happy. The truth is that everyone suffers in life and we have the ability to endure it through positive thinking and focus. Those who want to commit suicide or to assist others in suicide are probably focusing too much on the suffering. Of course we all die eventually, but even a few more years is given the right determination and focus on the meaning of life. Friends and family of the terminally ill should never want them to die in order to end their suffering but should instead celebrate their lives and always keep in mind that the value of life is incomparably more important than happiness or suffering. Life is sacred and we should always seek to protect life and allow people to live until they die of natural causes.
Is it illegal to run a traffic light or speed even if someone’s life depended on it? In my opinion, I believe that this would be the morally right thing to do. If you have to rush someone to the hospital because they were in need of medical attention I believe that it would be okay to speed and run through a traffic light. If you have to drive someone to the hospital and you’re sitting there at a red light and no cars are around I think it is safe to say that you

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Discussion topic 1 PHI208

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages

    People do things according to their character, if someone always disobey the road rules and don’t get caught, then they think it’s the right thing. However, someone who takes the rules of the road serious they would not think of even running a stop sign.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “I could get along so easy and so nice if I didn't have you on my tail” (Steinbeck 7). In Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck, two laborers in California work when they can to make money to achieve their dream. But when one of the two make a mistake the other is forced to kill him to save him from a painful death. This is called euthanasia. Euthanasia is mercy killing or killing to put them out of their misery. Mercy killing or euthanasia is a different way to show that you care to a loved one in need.…

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    With that being said, there are two main types of euthanasia called active euthanasia and passive euthanasia. Active euthanasia describes actively attempting to end a patient’s life by means of drugs or a lethal injection. Passive euthanasia is defined as removing or withholding a medicine or treatment that could have prolonged the patient’s life. Recently, there has been much debate on whether or not passive euthanasia is as morally wrong as active euthanasia. Some claim that passive euthanasia is not a direct violation of the basic good of human life, therefore it is morally permissible. They declare active euthanasia, on the other hand, is a direct violation, and therefore is not morally permissible. I will concede that this statement is technically true in a few rare situations, but in the majority of passive euthanasia cases, the patient is being taken off life support because he is tired of living and simply wants to die. And if that is the case, who’s to tell some terminally ill patient that he’s just going to have to live out his remaining days off treatment in pain and without hope. If a terminal patient wants to die, he should be accommodated not simply ignored. If some patients would like to refuse treatment, and live out the rest of their days naturally, that’s their decision too. It’s the patient’s life. Doctors should act on the requests of their patients, not what…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    To sum it all up, euthanasia should be allowed. One has the power of their life. Especially when it is causing them pain and the people around them. Having to either pay for another ill person in result to their family being ill when they are in pain can get very expensive. There are people who need the help and the money more than the people who only have a few months…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Being immoral is ok because if we didn’t take risks than we wouldn’t human we would be an object and humans take risk and sometimes is for the best but you should never be ok with being basic.Being immoral can be anything and stupid people always think that the definition of…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    ethics

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages

    According to the ANA, euthanasia is the act of helping to end the suffering of an individual by assisting in their suicide wishes. ("Code for nurses," 1985) This has been a topic of great debate for quite some time as certain individuals see this as inhumane and that no person has the right to determine when or how they die. Dr. Jack Kevorkian, also known as Dr. Death, assisted several individuals with suicide, which eventually landed him in prison. Is it ethical to want to help one end their suffering at their own request? Should we dictate this for a terminal cancer patient that has gone several rounds with chemotherapy and no success or a person that has multiple sclerosis and no chance of regaining the same function they had at one time in their lives?…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    From personal experience, I have come to understand the strains and grief of the issue when my grandfather was suffering from terminal thyroid cancer. He told me how painful everyday was for him, with constant flows of morphine giving him temporary relief. On top of this the constant thought that eventually this illness would kill him, no matter what happens. He was helpless and there was nothing we could do for him while he suffered. My grandfather and my family shouldn't have had to endure through this nightmare. I know that my grandfather didn't want to live like this, nobody does. Why wouldn't you want to help end the anguish? Are you so selfish so that you would keep them in pain just for your benefit? I hope not. The ambitions of the health and medical institutions should remain one of saving lives but this should not be at the cost of compassion for the terminally ill and their right to choose how to end their life and die with dignity. So help legalise euthanasia, so we can make a difference for those in need and give them the…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Assisted Suicide

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Assisted suicide, it’s a very controversial topic. Some people are for it and many more are against it as it pushes the moral boundaries of right and wrong. The idea of assisted suicide, (ending a life by one’s choice) is not acceptable in many cultures, religions or personal beliefs, but is it any different that euthanizing an animal because that animal is terminally ill or in excruciating pain with no available treatment? How or why isn’t that seen as immoral and wrong? Is it any different than a person who is in pain suffering from a terminal illness, or in incurable and unmanageable pain from end stage diseases? End stage diseases such as cancer are very painful and no amount of pain medicine to manage pain can bring relief. In my opinion, just as many other choices we as humans are allowed to make, assisted suicide should be one.…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Everybody has heard of famous court cases regarding euthanasia or news stories talking about people who have used it, but what is it really? Euthanasia is the practice of ending a human’s life with that person’s consent, either by withholding life supporting medical care and drugs or by a specific act of killing (Newton, 2009). The patient must be in critical care and have very little chance of recovery in order to use euthanasia. Many court cases have fought for the rights to use it on patients and repeatedly their requests are shut down. So should the killing of humans be illegal, or should people be allowed to decide when and how we are going to die?…

    • 3356 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The moral issue that I will discuss about is Euthanasia. Euthanasia simplu means bringing the death of another for the benefit of that person and also known as mercy killing. “When a person carries out an act of euthanasia, he brings about the death of another person because he believes the latter's present existence is so bad that she would be better off dead, or believes that unless he intervenes and ends her life, it will become so bad that she would be better off dead” (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). There are two forms of euthanasia; voluntary and non-voluntary. Voluntary euthanasia means if it’s coming from the patient him or herself. Non - voluntary means a family member making the decision for the patient. In an active euthanasia which is illegal, it is saying that you are performing direct action to take someone’s life. In a passive euthanasia which is legal, it is allowing someone to die by not performing some life sustaining action. What does euthanasia has to do with morality? My morality behind euthanasia is that euthanasia should be the right to die for patients who are intensely ill. Euthanasia is natural in a way because in real life, there is a matter of life and death. It is natural for people to live but death is also part of nature. No one can live forever, and since euthanasia is performed on people facing serious illness and facing death. Euthanasia seems to understand the course of nature and its ways by letting the patient wish be fulfilled and let them die in peace instead of suffering in pain.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Antigone

    • 1169 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Euthanasia is a topic that is rarely covered in the news. The moral ramifications of killing someone, even for the sake of mercy, seems too heavy of a topic for in depth discussion. No one wants to think about the day they will die, however when someone becomes terminally ill it can soon become their only thought. When pain and suffering enter this scenario, the option of ending a life more quickly may also enter the thought process. According to Life and Hope Network “9% of all deaths in America are caused by Euthanasia” 1 We are given the gift of life at birth. I believe Euthanasia is a violation of the most precious gift we are given… life…

    • 1169 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many people who are diagnosed with incurable diseases want to be able to die gracefully and on their own terms but are not permitted to do so. Reasons like this are why assisted suicide should be legalized for people with incurable diseases. Euthanasia should be a right granted to all citizens who are suffering from a degenerative, fatal, or painful condition that would enable them to enjoy their lives as healthy people do. There is much controversy on this subject, and frankly, it should not be up for discussion. It is not up to society to make decisions that infringe upon the rights of the physically ill. Firstly, it would allow the ill to practice their rights, it would grant doctors the opportunity to do their primary job in society, which is helping people. Euthanasia would save money that could be better spent on other fields of medicine. Lastly, assisted suicide should be legal in order to give patients the ability to decide their own fate. Furthermore, having the option to physician assisted suicide allows the patient to maintain control over his or her situation and to end life in an ethical and…

    • 4225 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia is a complex and controversial topic in society today. Euthanasia is an action or omission to cause death. One topic that is hotly debated is physician-assisted suicide. Physician-assisted suicide is an act of commission by a willing patient and his or her doctor to end his or her life. I believe that physician-assisted suicide is justified in the terminally ill or those with incurable diseases as long as they’re deemed mentally capable of making that decision.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Euthanasia has been hotly debated among the general public in society for many years and it has not reached the mutual agreement in many countries yet. However, the true value of life could not be replaced by anything. If people have any wrong decision on euthanasia, it would be an irretrievable regret. I am going to analyze euthanasia with Utilitarianism, Kantian ethics, Liberalism, Confucianism and religious values. Then, I will draw a conclusion to see if euthanasia is morally permissible or not.…

    • 1989 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    One may argue that, everyone in life should be allowed to make their own choices. If someone wants to end their life, they should be allowed. If a patient is not well enough to do it themselves, they may ask a doctor to do it for them. This is where the term assisted suicide comes from. However, in my opinion, it should NOT be called assisted suicide. What euthanasia should really be known as is murder. If we were to examine the definition of first degree murder, Washington State…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays