Preview

Legal Moralism In Criminal Law

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
515 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Legal Moralism In Criminal Law
Legal moralism is the view that the criminal law is basically allowed to enforce the moral law. In other words anything that is wrong can be a proper subject of criminal law. If something is wrong it can be criminalized. That’s a very broad view point but that is why legal moralists prefer this view point. Problems can arise when trying to be a legal moralist in a pluralistic kind of society. With the clash of different cultures and religions. Different kinds of groups will have different ideas of what is right and wrong. An example is if you have one religion that believes that eating pork is wrong then we would be able to use the criminal law to say it’s wrong and illegal to eat pork. When someone else that likes to eat pork and answers the question that “I do not think it is wrong to eat pork”. That person that is questioning the law, that person’s liberty is being limited. That person’s freedom to eat pork is being taken away just on the basis of someone else’s moral beliefs. …show more content…
Legal moralism will violate the being equal part of the law. In other words we are elevating the moral views of the anti-pork people above the moral views of the pork liking people. It looks to the point we would be treating the different groups moral values differently. This of course would be unacceptable from the point of view from the idea of our liberal democracy government and what is should be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Understand who is an employee and who is an independent contractor and know the risks of misclassification.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Merriam-Webster slippery slope is defined as a process or series of events that is hard to stop or control once it has begun and that usually leads to worse or more difficult behavior. In the law enforcement field, gratuity, which is the receipt of free meals, services, or discounts, goes hand in hand with the term slippery slope. Many think it is both unethical and immoral to except gratuities on and off the job. Gratuity by others is viewed as “A relatively innocent transaction in a work universe in which the standard form of reciprocity . . . is extortion-ate rather than hospitable.” (Delattre,…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    reduction and prevention, and are also used as a factor to determine the success of the criminal…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Contrasting Defiance theory, Criminal Law theory implies individuals do understand what they are doing is wrong and the only factor that diverts them from crime is the fear of punishment further arguing that restorative justice undermines the law (Simester et al., 2014). On the contrary Sherman et al. (2005) made it clear there was no evidence found which supports the undermining of the law by the restorative justice approaches and it would benefit individuals worldwide, especially those who fall victim to personal crimes such as rape. Additionally Bottoms (2003) stated restorative justice would not be effective in contemporary society due to the victim and offender needed a relationship of some sort and in cases of stranger rape this isn’t…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When police officers are not punished for behaving inappropriately, the criminal justice system ignores an unnecessary lapse in its operation. Not every case handled by law enforcement will be cut and dry. Many factors contribute to unique situations that require equally unique solutions. Cases like those of Michael Brown and Eric Garner speak to that. However, when an officer meant to uphold the law and act in good faith engages in misconduct, it is only logical that they be disciplined for their actions. Additionally, measures must be taken to hold law enforcement accountable for their actions. It is crucial for law enforcement to maintain a good relationship with their communities. A skewed power dynamic can only lead to issues.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If terrorists are granted the same civil liberties, such as the right to trial, as Americans have, should they be required to pay taxes too? While Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution states, "The privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it" and under this provision, persons detained by the government are entitled to a judicial hearing to determine if there is any legal basis for their detention; I believe "enemy combatants" and terrorists should not be entitled to the Writ of Habeas Corpus and the same civil liberties as law-abiding U.S. citizens are entitled to because national-security is a top priority for the U.S. and individuals that are suspected of terrorism plan to rebel against or invade our nation, suspected terrorists are detained, interrogated, and sent to trial outside of the United States, and as of current, most individuals suspected of terrorism have not been detained indefinitely and have been released without charges or turned over to other governments.…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Even though living in pain can be a physical and emotional toll on a person’s life, no one can judge or comment on it without knowing how it feels, but choosing to end your life for this cause is ethically wrong. A person should not be able to choose between life and death like it is something normal that we do every day. Dying is not the answer to a person’s problems, pains, or sufferings. Now a day technology and medicine are highly advanced and can cure or reduce the pain of a person with a disease. Choosing to end your life is basically committing suicide and suicide is wrong.…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics 316

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Legality based on obedience of a law that gives detail to an action or belief it also a certain detail of one’s actions as well. Morality is a way one shows principle, honor, virtue, decency, that promotes a safe and healthy way of life for everyone. I feel that there is a difference amongst the two and that being legality will place value and not let one learn from mistakes and set themselves up for failure and won’t be…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The relationship between what society believes is important and worth protecting and how it is reflected in criminal law can be described in many ways. Society in general views actions such as murder, rape, robbery or even burglary as an act, evil in nature, public or of moral principles. These actions are considered to be Malum in se. Laws which are viewed as Malum prohibitum, consist of acts banned by laws such as speeding, drug use, or even prostitution. These acts are seen as regulatory infractions, more examples include, inside traders who illegally share information or avoiding tax payments. The only way for a person to be criminally prosecuted there must be proof that harm at any time was done to another.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Several morally ambiguous characters played different vital roles in Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoevsky. In fact, most characters illustrated in this twisted novel can be evaluated as possesing "good" and "evil" qualities. Sonia Marmeladov is especially ambiguous and important in this novel. Her contradicting social and moral statuses along with her contrasting roles as a saintly liberator and sinner allowed Sonia to play a crucial role throughout the novel. Not only that but her character further strengthens the theme of religious awakening. At times Sonia's character becomes hard to categorize as "good" or "evil" because of her actions. The first descriptions the reader gets of Sonia are from her drunk father, Marmeladov. She has lived her life with little money, poor housing conidtions described as having "every sign of povery" (294). Sonia tries to make an honest living by making linen shirts but "do you suppose that a respectable poor girl can earn much by hard work? Not fifteen farthings a day can she earn"(15). Not merely enough to support a family along with her drunk father's habits. So Sonia eventually becomes a prositute in order to to support her family and gains a "yellow ticket" (16) This is what gained Sonia her title as a sinner and which puts her character at question. However, Marmeladov explains to Raskolnikov how Sonia goes to them "mostly after dark, she comforts Katerina Ivanorna and gives her all she can"( 16). This part of Sonia's character depicts her as a loving daughter willing to sacrifice herself to save her family. This portrayal in some ways resembles Christ as "He himself bore our sins" in his body on the cross, so that we might die to sins and live for righteousness." He sarcrificed himself as she sacrifies herself. Does that change the fact that she is committing a sin? No of course not and that is exactly where the conflict of her morality takes place. The world sees her in "such an attire"(163)which puts her to…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ethics in Criminal Justice

    • 1895 Words
    • 6 Pages

    I have chosen for my research paper the career of an FBI agent. In this paper I will explain some interesting facts about what it takes to become an agent, what skills are necessary, what the requirements are, benefits of the position and many, many more. I chose to discuss what it takes to become an FBI agent because it is a jo I have wanted to have for a long time. It is why I am in criminal justice. The fact is very few people know what it actually takes to become one. Hopefully after this you will.…

    • 1895 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics virtual

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Morality and Law derives from our own beliefs per how we humans should be governed or abide by. It is impossible to distinguish the two in that morality comes from our beliefs in a particular practice or ordinance. Our moral beliefs and the laws that govern us are similar in that majority of our laws are created to safeguard what we as society stand for. For example; there are laws created to enforce certain actions when a violation occurs. These laws are put into place by humans to protect society from what is consider actions detrimental to their existence. On the other hand, people live a certain way and follow certain code due to their beliefs. In the previous reading in chapter one, there was a situation involving a husband and wife that had different views about pregnancy prevention due to their own moral standards. Laws now are created due to the complex nature of morality. In the United States, it is against the law to practice polygamy. Polygamy happens to be a practice followed by individuals who believe in having multiple spouses. Morality and laws cannot be separated because laws are created to at times contain the moral values of society while morality tends to side with individuals in society who follow a certain code that majority of society are not governed by .…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legalism is only concerned with the laws and uses them for a basis in deciding the most moral action to take. It is deontological approach to morality. In Christianity a fundamentalist could be classed as a legalistic as they would follow the 10 commandments to the word and never break them. Fletcher disagreed with the idea that a law should always be the moral thing to believe in terms of ethical decisions. For example it was once a rule to stone the oldest son of a family if they did not listen to the demands of the father- legalism would view this as correct but by anyone’s plain judgment there are errors in this way of thinking, this is what Fletcher believed. Legalism does accept and take account for exceptions and special factors and always try to update rules to cover these exceptions, however Fletcher viewed this as complicated and just a creation of rules, sub-rules and regulations creating a too constricted way of living. Fletcher rejected legalism because he believed rules and laws caused too many problems, he also believed that the idea that one rule had to outlaw another in certain circumstances would mean that there would be too many rules to remember and a book would have to be created full of contradicting rules to suit…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Martin Luther King Jr. and Niccolo’ Machiavelli had their own perspectives on what was moral and immoral. King and Machiavelli view what was morality right and how they would use this judgment in government and how it affected people in everyday life. King fought a moral fight against what was described as immoral laws to oppress blacks during an era of segregation in the United States. He believes that sometime it is moral to take action against immoral laws to get the results he and others that fought alongside him desired. Machiavelli as a Ruler, during a time when his country was unstable and constant political in-fighting, believed it was better to be feared than loved, and he took the immoral action of oppression to gain respect morally from his followers as a result. Machiavelli was a believer of the art of war to gain power, while King believed power was achieved in non-violence.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immoral Laws

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As for the other question in this discussion, it is possible for a moral law to be illegal. For example, two Montgomery, Alabama, pro-life activists were arrested in late June just in front of an abortion clinic for trying to avoid a sprinkler that is used to spray pro-life speakers on the public sidewalk. Isn’t it moral for one to protest abortions? Yet, they were still arrested for interfering with the clinic’s…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays