Preview

Legal & Ethical Issues Mid Term

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1323 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Legal & Ethical Issues Mid Term
MGMT 625
Midterm Exam

TRUE/FALSE QUESTIONS (2 POINTS EACH)

1. The stability and predictability of the law is essential to busi­ness activities.

ANSWER: TRUE

2. Uniform laws apply in all states, including those in which the laws have not been adopted.

ANSWER: FALSE

3. A state law that conflicts with the U.S. Constitution will be deemed unconstitutional.

ANSWER: TRUE

4. Damages is a remedy at law.

ANSWER: TRUE

5. Equitable remedies include injunctions and decrees of specific performance.

ANSWER: TRUE

6. How the courts interpret a statute determines how that statute is applied.

ANSWER: TRUE

7. Minimum contacts with a jurisdiction are never enough to support jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant.

ANSWER: FALSE

8. Concurrent jurisdiction exists when both federal and state courts have the power to hear a particular case.

ANSWER: TRUE

9. Any lawsuit involving a federal question can originate in a federal court.

ANSWER: TRUE
10. Venue is the term for the subject matter of a case.

ANSWER: FALSE

11. The federal equivalent of a state trial court is a U.S. court of appeals.

ANSWER: FALSE

12. Alternative dispute resolution refers to any method for resolving a dispute outside the court system.

ANSWER: TRUE

13. An arbitrator can never render a legally binding decision.

ANSWER: False 14. The checks and balances in the U.S. Constitution prevent any one branch of government from exercising too much power.

ANSWER: TRUE

15. When there is a direct conflict between a federal and a state law, the state law is rendered invalid.

ANSWER: TRUE 16. The First Amendment does not protect commercial speech as extensively as noncommercial speech.

answer: TRUE 17. A business firm's profits may suffer if the firm acts unethically.

ANSWER: TRUE

18. An ethics program can clarify what a company considers to be unacceptable conduct.

ANSWER: TRUE 19.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A court is required to use long-arm jurisdiction over persons and businesses in another State when a civil wrong is committed within a State; when there is a contract in the State or a contract affects the State and when a business is transacted that allegedly cause injury to another person. “long arm jurisdiction is a statutory grant of jurisdiction to local courts over foreign ("foreign" meaning out-of-state) defendants. A state's ability to confer jurisdiction is limited by the Constitution. This jurisdiction permits a court to hear a case against a defendant and enter a binding judgment against a defendant…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hsc300 Unit 4

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages

    8. Venue and Jurisdiction: Disagreement about where and which courts will hear claims; resolves which courts such judicial action will take place…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    BUS311 CASE Study 1

    • 336 Words
    • 1 Page

    If Javier sued Energy-Auto, Javier would be the plaintiff and the defendant would be the business. Our text book states that “The other type of federal subject matter jurisdiction is known as diversity of citizenship. Diversity jurisdiction means that the plaintiff (the person suing) and the defendant (the one being sued) are from different states’’ (Rogers, 2012). Javier can sue in New York since that is his home of record even if it happened in Oklahoma. If Javier had 100,000 in damages it can go to federal court, According to our text book the claim has to be over $75,000 and the rationale is that an out-of-state party might face local prejudice in state courts so they are given the choice to go to federal court (Rogers, 2012). Now this case can still be brought to federal court since both the plaintiff and defendant are both out of state parties, and would be heard at federal court under diversity jurisdiction. The advantage of federal versus state court would be a judge would not lose its job for making the wrong ruling in this case which is why it is sent to federal court and rulings are heard from a judge that has been appointed forever or until he/she is impeached or reaches retirement. Disadvantage would be state vs. federal court is the state wouldn’t have subject matter jurisdiction in this case and would not know how to handle it the case.…

    • 336 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    busa 2106

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages

    8. The federal courts and the state courts can never have concurrent jurisdiction over the same case.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal jurisdiction and civil jurisdiction brings about the protective jurisdiction of courts. They necessitate the occasions for instituting the proceedings. Further criminal and civil jurisdiction therefore implies with respect to the mature of the subject matter and civil or criminal mature of the actions. Such an action therefore does not aim in the creation of another authority. Territorial aspects may come in hand, however the nature of the action determines the jurisdiction the case will be handled. It merely extends the limits of the particular jurisdiction. It is therefore not mandatory.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Under the minimum contacts test, the court may exercise jurisdiction either specifically or generally. Specific jurisdiction takes place when an isolated act has occurred, giving jurisdiction over that act only. However, if the defendant has many contacts and activities within the state, he can be sued over any and all…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The system of checks and balances is an important part of the United States Constitution. The three branches of the government representing the separation of powers – executive, legislative, and judicial – each hold specific responsibilities. Checks and balances is a method set in place so that no branch of the government can become to powerful by allowing each branch to limit the powers of the others. This is accomplished by each branch checking the powers of the other branches to ensure the balance between all three. “The rationale of the separation of powers is often elided with the rationale of checks and balances and with the rationale of the dispersal of power generally in a constitutional system” (Waldron).…

    • 799 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Funny Face Case Study

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Generally, this power only covers a specific geographic region. For example in the state court system, a court's in personam jurisdiction usually extends to the state's borders, whereas a federal court exerts power over a greater area (Kubasek, Browne, Giampetro-Meyer, Barkacs, Herron, Williamson, & Dhooge, 2011). Because this case involves multiple parties from multiple geographic areas, the statutes regarding in personam jurisdiction must be scrutinized for all three states involved (New York, California, and Florida) before a venue may be decided upon.…

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Personal jurisdiction is what gives the court system the authority over a case and the parties involved. The courts cannot have power over a case until the parties involved have a certain amount of interactions with the courts under the constitution. “Personal jurisdiction is generally waivable, so if a party appears in a court without objecting to the court's lack of jurisdiction over it, that objection is forfeited.” () .…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Persons who believe that law is "discovered" by men and women through the use of reasoning and choosing between good and evil, believe in which school of jurisprudential thought?…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Juvenile justice has been substantially unaffected by alternative philosophies that differ from the rehabilitation emphasis.…

    • 3936 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a traditional litigation the process is very structured. Usually a lawyer is needed to represent then the process will proceed through the judicial system. A judge and jury will render an unpredictable ruling based on the law rather than justice. An alternative dispute resolution is much more flexible. In the alternative dispute resolution parties can select a neutral decision maker with specific expertise pertaining to the dispute. The procedure and format also can be agreed upon by both parties.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    gtug ghjyu

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages

    prevail and the law made by the legislature of the state shall, to the extent of the…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Litigation

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Alternative Dispute Resolution is a way that a company can avoid some of the drawback’s that are seen in the use of traditional litigation. The…

    • 1345 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jurisdiction over the person of the defendant IS required. A proceeding to determine the state or condition of a thing. An action to impose a responsibility or liability upon a person directly.…

    • 38846 Words
    • 265 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays