Plaintiff, for all times mentioned herein, was and is a resident of the County of Jackson, State of Missouri.…
Kimberly Ellerth worked in Burlington’s Chicago office from March 1993 through May 1994, first as a merchandising assistant and later as a sales representative. Theodore Slowik was a New York based Vice-President of sales and marketing, supervising Ellerth’s immediate supervisors. Slowik made primarily the decision as to Ellerth’s hire and subsequent promotion. Ellerth spoke with Slowik when he traveled to her Chicago office and when she traveled to business related conferences in New York and elsewhere. Ellerth was required to get Slowik’s approval of special sales to her customers. Soon after Ellerth began working for Burlington, Slowik began to subject Ellerth to harassing acts and comments, coupled with threats that her refusal to submit would result in retaliation. For example, in the summer of 1993, Slowik made a series of comments about Ellerth’s legs and breasts. Ellerth never gave Slowik’s any indication that she was interested in him. Nonetheless, he continued to subject her to unwanted touching of her body. Ellerth resigned soon after Slowik refused to authorize a special project for one of Ellerth’s customers. Three weeks after resigning, Ellerth informed Slowik’s supervisors at Burlington that she had resigned due to Slowik’s harassment. She testified that she did not complain about Slowik’s harassment while still employed by Burlington because she feared for losing her job.…
In orders to offer a cure for the employment abuse in the NLRB, is the trade union recognize the new appointment and the retroactive payments. The NLRA don’t had submitted any fined and the income could be lower than the benefits.…
Dayton Hudson Department Store Company versus United Automobile Workers (UAW) and National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)…
General Motors will pay $900 million to a criminal charge that is from the flawed ignition that has caused at least 124 deaths. The problem with the ignition is that it could shut off the car, which disables the airbags, steering, and power brakes. With this flaw it puts drives and anyone in the vehicle at risk. General Motors employees have been aware of this issue for almost 10 years before the recall. It is not illegal to sell a car that has an issue with it. The reason the company is being charged is for not reporting and stating that it has an issue.…
The Griggs v. Duke Power Company was a landmark case regarding discrimination in the workplace. Duke Power Company was known for discriminating against blacks during the hiring process by only allowing them to work in it’s labor department which was the lowest paying position. After the Civil Rights Act was passed, obviously the company was no longer allowed to discriminate legally based on race. However, the company became sneaky and required a high school diploma for employment. This, in turn eliminated a lot of potential black employees because a majority of them did not have high school diplomas. This really became an issue when Griggs applied for a position, but it was denied because he did not…
2. In March of 1998, Ledbetter submitted a questionnaire to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) alleging sex discrimination against her employer. In July of 1998, she filed a formal EEOC charge against the company.…
Assume this case happened at a place you have worked in the past, or where you work now (or want to work.) Give an example of how the decision in the case above could lead to better or worse employee relations in your company.…
1. Beief description of the situation.Christina Elwell was the national sales director for Google in 2003. In April 2004 she informed her supervisor, Timothy Armstrong, that she bad become pregneat with quadruplets. By May she felt she was being discriminated against and filed a lawsuit with the US district court in New York. She felt this way due to the following instances:According to the lawsuit Armstrong was concerned about Elwells ability to travel due to the complications with the pregnancy. That May he allegedly showed Elwell an organizational chart where her position was deleted. He then asked her to accept another position in the operations department. Elwell…
On November 26, 2012, the case of Vance V. Ball State University was argued. A woman by the name of Maetta Vance filed a complaint about a coworker…
The plaintiff, Elaine, has sued the defendant, Jerry, because the defendant fired her after the plaintiff was on the job for two months. The job offer letter that the defendant had sent her mentioned the great career opportunities at the company and stated that her annual salary would be $30,000. The company is an employment-at-will employer. The plaintiff was given no reason for the termination. After the termination, the defendant hired a man named Kramer, who had less job experience and education than the plaintiff, for the position. The plaintiff is suing to get her job back. Based upon the readings and the case the legal issues that are raised are: Did the defendant (Jerry) act ethically in this case? Was the plaintiff wrongfully terminated? And did the defendant engage in sexual discrimination, which is a violation of the Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act?…
The purpose of this case study is to justify the fairness of the court settlement between the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and the Burlington Northern Railroad & Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF). Burlington Northern did willingly and knowingly breach employee personal privacy, as well as the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) in conducting unauthorized genetic blood testing on unknowing employees. The court mandate that they pay $2.2 million to 36 employees is fair and just. To illustrate the fairness of the settlement, I will show the utilitarian perspective from Burlington Northern Railway offices as well as the employees’ view. I will also show the deontological considerations by outlining the contractual violation by the company.…
On January 5, Mrs. Bennett started working at Rikards-Hayley, an investment banking firm located at 121 Centre St., New York, New York. Her first job was in training and development, where she received nothing but superior evaluation from her supervisors. At precisely two years ago, she was promoted to acting manager of the department. As acting manager she received superior evaluation. Five months into the job Mrs. Bennett was notified that the company was going to fill the manager position and she applied for the position. She was told by her supervisor, Darren Blackwood, that management liked her but she did not quite fit the image they were seeking. She needed to lose weight and change her attitude towards he male employees. She was told that she was “too assertive.” Mrs. Bennett was not hired as manager; instead the company hired Martina Yardley. After Mrs. Yardley was hired, Mrs. Bennett claimed she was made miserable. Yardley criticized her work constantly and also made comments about her appearance. Two months ago Mrs. Bennett was fired. When male employees were terminated from Rikards-Hayley, they commonly receive severance package consisting of one year’s salary; Bennett’s severance package contained on six months’ salary. As a result of her treatment at work, Bennett claims she suffered physically and emotionally. To date her medical bills have totaled $2500. She has also been unable to find work; she earned $150,000 before she was terminated.…
The story begins at a local Wal-Mart super center, its Friday, payday. As employees open their paychecks they are awaiting their annual raise. As one employee, Sue opens up her paycheck she finds she has not yet received a raise; she has waited all year for this raise. She is very sad to find she did not receive one, she begins to think maybe she did something wrong. She starts to think back through the year, and can not seem to come up with any solutions as to why she did not receive one. She really felt she worked especially hard that year in hopes to receive a good raise and really felt she deserved to be recognized for it. In the break room she overhears John, her follow co-worker, bragging to their colleague 's about his second raise. Now John is making $1.25 more per hour than her even though they both have been working at Wal-Mart for two years. They both have the same job descriptions and titles so there should not be differences in their pay. Sue can not quite understand why he received two when she only received one. She has seen him numerous times being tardy for work or calling in sick. She knows she is a better worker and is more efficient. Sue recently took a human resource class at Buffalo State College and she remembers learning about a law regarding equal pay. She can 't seem to recall the specifics, so she is determined to look into it further and fix the problem.…
Horne was appointed Managing Director Gilford Motor Co 6-year term. He appointed by a written agreement says he will not solicit customers for their own purposes and whether he is a general manager or after he left. In order to avoid the effect of the agreement, Horne left Gilford Motor Co. and started his own company. Johnson's company provides car accessories of Gilford Motor Co’s car in a weaken price and the shareholder of Gilford Motor being his associate in his own company. Horne has been a violation of his agreement with Gilford Motor, so he started a new company. Gilford Motor Co prosecute violations of the labor contract, Horne believes that the company has a separate legal identity. The operation of…