“Leadership plan suggested outline”
“Leader becomes not because they have power, but because of their ability to empower others” - John Maxwell. 6100- Leadership Theory and Assessment
Larry Faerman, PhD
Florida Atlantic University
If we a take deep look at the law enforcement’s history, many styles have been used to lead employees, groups by leaders coming from democratic to transactional. The earlier styles that were prominent and rigid among the leaders are Autocratic leadership and Laissez-Faire leadership. These leaderships slowly evolved with perspective modulations to Participative (democratic) leadership, which bifurcated into Transactional and Transformational leaderships. What is a leadership? Leadership is the action of leading a group of people or an organization, or the ability to do this. Leadership has evolved down the timeline with many policies being incorporated into it while being applied large scale and small scale organizations. However, democratic style has gained quite an interest among the people with many leaders still clinging on to an antique and domineering style of leadership. This paper will provide you a suggested outline after identifying the traits of various leadership theories and adapt strategies that are required by analyzing and designing the policy culture that is required in the leadership. As the society is evolving, changes are mandatory to meet the needs of the organizations and their psychology in order to attain benefits in the competing world of 21st century. Stating several aspects of the leadership along with a depth review of goals and outcome which would help to meet the needs of the followers, and to which can aspire them towards self-actualization, this paper gives you a brief description of leadership plan. Although, it’s not possible to provide an empirical research of the plan in this paper; the literature, blackboard, readings and various resources from internet are reviewed and analyzed to design the leader ship plan. This paper’s key role is to emphasize that a leader should be transformational with the employees, involving them in the decision-making process with a functional outline.
Leadership establishes sophistication in any organization. Therefore, even agencies like law enforcement require leadership to maintain an order. However, when the leadership turns dependable and apposite, the benefits turn larger in any agency (Spinelli, 2006). Leaders plan the outcome and the goal and aspire people towards the goal with desired modifications in the system. Lussier & Achua (2004) stated that leadership is not merely an influence, but an inspiration which push people towards the accomplishment of the goals through organizational change. A well established leadership binds leaders with employees, target the organizational objectives, incorporates the psychological patterns of the people for the change and influence them accordingly. With seven billion people around the world, everyone leads someone somewhere at some point of their life. But the greatness exists in terms of where did they lead and how did they lead. The key point of being a good leader is to be a good follower, first. Scholars often define leader as the one who plans, executes, implements, directs and guides the followers towards the mutual goal. Definitions of leadership changed from time to time with person to person and perception to perception. In 1999, Hesser noted that the leadership is a two component phenomena, both organizational and personal. He also added that success demands commitment and knowledge of both the components over time. However, Spinelli’s definition of leadership has been pretty distinct from this. Spinelli (2006) stated that a leader should be suitable and accountable to be successful. On the other hand, Leadership was...
References: Northouse, P. G. (2013). Leadership: Theory and practice (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Avolio, B. J., & Yammarino, F. J. (2002). Transformational and charismatic leadership: the road ahead. Amsterdam: JAI.
Clawson, J. G. (2006). Level three leadership: getting below the surface. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Dulewicz, C., Young, M., & Dulewicz, V. (2005). The relevance of emotional intelligence for leadership performance. Journal of General Management, 30(3), 71-86.
Jui-Chen, C., & Silverthorne, C. (2005). Leadership effectiveness, leadership style and employee readiness. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 26(3/4), 280-288.
Robins, S. P. (2007). Pearson prentice hall self-assessment libary. Pearson Prentice Hall Self-Assessemt Library.
Yukl, G. A. (2006). Leadership in organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Autocrat. (2010). In Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. Retrieved March 1, 2010, from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/autocrat
Adlam, R., & Villiers, P
Bass, B. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
Bass, B. (1988). Charismatic leadership: The elusive factor in organizational effectiveness. In Evolving perspectives on charismatic leadership, ed. Conger,
J., & Kanungo, N
Bass, B., Waldman, D., Avolio, B., & Bebb, M. (1987). Transformational leadership and the falling dominoes effect. Group & Organization Studies, 12, 73-87.
Bass, B. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18, 19-36.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document