Leadership Discovery Project
By: Marie Smith
EPS 526 – Organizational Theory, Group Dynamics and Leadership
Systems are everywhere. A person has a system how to wash clothes, how to wash dishes. A person even has a system how to write their term papers. The childcare sector has uses the system theory. “This is where writers, educators, consultants, and theorist help managers to look at the center from a broader perspective.” (Carter McNamara MBA)A system is getting input from the environment, to process a plan of action, implementing the plan to reach the common goal. This brings me to the system theory. A system has interconnected parts that depend on each other to develop the mutual goal, which is a successful center. The interconnected parts are the environment, the processes, and the outcomes. Each component needs the support of the other to keep the common goal. According to Bloom the system theory is, “A set of interrelated parts that is characterized by the interdependence of its parts and it differentiation from its environment, a complex network of social relationships, and its own unique culture.” (Bloom, 2005, p. 5) The environment is a place where input is implemented. When I think of a childcare center environment I think of children and how they develop. I think of the atmosphere, the setting, and the conditions that can spark the chil d’s analytical thinking abilities. But that is just the internal environment. The external environments consist of the parents, sponsoring agencies, local communities, legislative bodies, and the professional communities / teachers. “The external environment places constraints and demands on the center.” (Bloom, 2005) The external environment is the input and processing stage. This is a collaboration of people and agencies that come up with strategies to support the development of the center. The centers that have sponsors have money and agencies that develop supportive programs such as art, literacy, and technology. Columbia College sponsors the center that I work for. The center used the money Columbia gave them to developed a program for the teachers to learn the importance of art and how a person can utilize art throughout the day. Parents, sponsoring agencies, local communities, legislative bodies, and the professional communities / teachers are big factors on the input and processing stage. Parents may demand that the students have more free play and outdoor play. The sponsoring agencies might require more outcome data. The local communities may ask the center to stop the students from writing on the ground with chalk. The Legislative bodies may require the students to take shorter naps for more gross motor activities. The professional communities may ask for better wages for their degrees. (Bloom, 2005, p. 6) After the inputs of complaints or suggestions the director needs to structure and process how to develop a plan of action. Getting feedback from the sources that asked for the changes is essential. After developing a plan of action the director can stand back and observe if the changes are working or not. This system allows the director to process the changes, implement the changes, and revise the changes if needed to prefect the change. The outcome process is very important because it could either sink or sail a center. If the changes in the program are not supported by staff, and parents this may become a problem that causes low enrollment, and staff turnovers. I am experiencing these problematic issues at the center I work for. Four years ago the center hired a new director. During the four years she has made lots of changes. She changed classroom teacher teams. She closed classrooms that were bringing in the students. She put teachers in infant classrooms when they did not want to work with babies. Recently she enforced closed campus lunch. No one can go out for lunch. You have to order your lunch...
Cited: Youth in Action. (1998, September). Retrieved August 25, 2012, from What is A Good Meeting: https://www.ncjrs.gov/html/ojjdp/yb9909-1/mtg-1.html
Bloom, P. J. (2002). Making the Most of Mettings. Lake Forest: New Horizons.
Bloom, P. J. (2005). Blueprint for Action. Lake Forest: New Horizons.
Carter McNamara MBA, P. (n.d.). www.managementhelp.org/magmnt/cntmpory.htm. Retrieved August 24, 2012, from Historical and Contemporary Theories of Management.
Curtis, M. C. (1998). The Visionary Director. St Paul: Redleaf Press.
Experts, M. (2008). Management Study Guide. Retrieved August 26, 2012, from A Basic Understanding of Participative Management: http://www.managementstudyguide.com
Tools, M. (n.d.). Mind Tools. Retrieved August 25, 2012, from Leadership Styles: http://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_84.htm
Please join StudyMode to read the full document