Preview

Law Test Notes

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3245 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Law Test Notes
1 – Partnership Ownership Changes & Liquidations - Heading

Chapter 14: Partnership Ownership
Changes & Liquidations

3 – Partnership Dissolution - #1

• Dissolution is a legal termination
• UPA § 31 & 32:
– admission or withdrawal of Pr results in Pp dissolution • When act of dissolution occurs, Prs may
– continue business as new Pp or
– liquidate

2 – Partnership Dissolution - Heading

Partnership Dissolution

4 – Partnership Dissolution - #2

• Remember dissolution is not liquidation
• Dissolution – Pp legally ends
• Liquidation - winding up of the Pp’s business affairs 1

5 – Admission of Partner - Heading

Admission of Partner

6 – Admission of Partner - #3

• Assume new GP gives money/property directly to existing Pp
• New GP is promised a % of Pp capital
• When: promised share of capital = capital contribution
Then no problem
• E.g., Assume New Pr contributes $10K and is promised share of Pp capital = $10K:

D. Contribution (e,g, Cash)
C. New Partner, Capital

7 – Admission of Partner - #4

• When incoming Pr contributes property worth more than new Pr’s share of Pp’s capital  2 possible reasons:
– Pp’s net assets worth more than their BVs; or
– Pp is worth more than sum of its net assets
(GW)

$10,000
$10,000

8 – Admission of Partner - #5

• When an incoming Pr contributes property worth less than share of Pp’s capital  One of two reasons:
– Pp’s net assets are worth less than their BVs; or
– Incoming Pr is contributing more than the FMV of contributed net assets (GW)

2

9 – Admission of Partner - #6

• When FMV of new Pr’s contribution ≠ new Pr’s share of Pp capital  Pp can use on of two following methods:

– the Bonus method; or
– the GW method

• These methods are mutually exclusive

10 – Admission of Partner - #6

GW Method:
• Write up all Pp assets to FMV & recognize any Pp GW
• Then record assets being contributed by incoming Pr at FMV & recognize any GW

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Law 531 Final Exam

    • 1213 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1) Which of the following is a distinguishing feature of a common law legal system?…

    • 1213 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Which element of a contract requires something of legal value to be provided in exchange…

    • 1968 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    HCS 567 Week 3

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For business with two or more owners the decision may be to utilize a general or a limited partnership. The general partnership is not dependent on one person for its successes in fact all the partners have a say in how the business runs and functions as per the partnership agreement (Barringer & Ireland, 2010). This type of organization is similar to the sole proprietorship in that the income is noted on the partners’ personal tax returns as the venture files and an informational tax return only (Barringer & Ireland, 2010). The venture also has limited liquidity. Limited partnership is a modified general partnership with the modification being the addition of two different class of partners, general and limited. This venture is used when attempting to…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    lit1 task 3

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    PROFIT RETENTION- The partnership has the ability to decide how the profits are allocated amongst each partner.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    LAW 531 Final EXAM

    • 3400 Words
    • 10 Pages

    1) Which of the following is a distinguishing feature of a common law legal system?…

    • 3400 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal Studies Summary Notes

    • 5906 Words
    • 24 Pages

    Representative government- means that the government must represent the views and interests of the people who voted them in. if they fail to do so then they will not be elected the next time, or could be kicked out of the parliament by the Governor General. Responsible government- the government must be answerable to the people and the parliament for its actions. If they fail to do so then they won’t be re-elected. Separation of power The power of government is divided into 3 main factions, Legislature, Executive and Judiciary. This is done so no-absolute person or body holds all the powers of the government and also so to prevent the parliament from possible abuse over power.    Legislature- is in chapter one of the commonwealth constitution, which is made up of the parliament members. They have the power to make laws. Executive- is in chapter two of the commonwealth constitution, made up of the Prime Minster and its Cabinet. They have the power to administer laws. Judiciary- is in chapter three of the commonwealth constitution, made up of the courts. They have the power to interpret and enforce laws.…

    • 5906 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Legal Studies 3/4 Notes

    • 9289 Words
    • 38 Pages

    The Principle of Representative Government • • • • • Government for the people, by the people People elect representatives Answerable to the people for their actions Must represent the views of the majority of people Failure to represent = loss of confidence = loss of government…

    • 9289 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Exam Law

    • 2389 Words
    • 10 Pages

    D. Promises to pay the debt of another contingent up the happening of some external event.…

    • 2389 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Legal Class Study Guide

    • 2465 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Contract- rules control the way owners make agreements to exchange resources in the property-based legal system.…

    • 2465 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Exam 2 Notes

    • 2574 Words
    • 11 Pages

    A group of people with shared feelings or attitudes that try to influence government policy making. Pluralism leads to interest groups.…

    • 2574 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Law Paper

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages

    One of the most controversial cases in American law is Roe v Wade, a decision impacting abortion laws in America. In the case, the Supreme Court ruled that a woman has a right to have an abortion anytime in the first trimester and can have an abortion in the second trimester under stricter conditions regarding the facility the abortion is performed in and the physician who performs the procedure. The decision angered many states because they previously had laws prohibiting abortion because many people at the time found it unsafe and immoral. The court defended its decision based on the 14th amendment, which gives a woman a fundamental right to “personal, marital, familial and sexual privacy” that is “protected by the bill of rights” (Baird 34). Fundamental rights, like freedom of speech, can only be taken away if the state has a compelling argument to take the right away. If a right is not deemed fundamental, the government only has to have a “rational scheme to achieve collective good” (Tribe 10). The most common example of this is driving; a right, which the government can take away for bad eyesight or not following traffic laws (Tribe 10). Since a woman’s right to privacy is fundamental, the court had to find a compelling argument to take the right away. In the past, abortion has been illegal because the government determined that protecting a woman’s health from unsafe procedures, discouraging illicit sexual acts, and protecting prenatal life were compelling arguments that could be used to take away the right to privacy. In today’s society, the court needs to consider similar compelling arguments. The court should find protecting the potentiality of life and the damage abortion can cause to women’s physical and emotional health as compelling arguments that can be used to overturn the decision of Roe v Wade and make abortion illegal in America.…

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Fails as Lawyers Declare the Legal Profession is Not for Sale! The Berkeley Electronic Press. Retrieved on May 19, 2013, from:http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1263&context=elders…

    • 1644 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law Midterm Studyguide

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Citizens Insurance v. Parsons was an 1881 decision, which established the test to determine governmental jurisdiction. The constitutional issue in this case concerned the validity of the Ontario Fire Insurance Policy Act. Parsons owned a hardware store in Orangeville, which was destroyed by fire one evening. Insured by Citizens Insurance, Parsons asked the company to cover him for his loss. Citizens Insurance refused to pay out on the basis that Parsons failed to comply with the conditions that had been written into the insurance contract. Parsons argued that the conditions failed to comply with provisions in the Ontario Fire Insurance Policy Act. Citizens Insurance argued that the Ontario law is invalid, as it imposes a contract with insurance companies – an aspect of trade and commerce that falls to the jurisdiction of the federal government. Parsons, however, argued that this was an issue of civil and property rights. This case went to trial, and eventually went to the JCPC, who acknowledged that there was a contradiction between S. 91(2) and S. 93(13). The JCPC then decided that although there was a possibility for overlap, there should be some way of determining which level of government has jurisdiction over what subject matter. This lead to the creation of the Parson’s Test. In the Parsons Test, you must consider if the dispute falls within one of the jurisdictions in Section 92 of the provinces. If the answer is no, then the jurisdiction automatically falls to the federal government. If the answer is yes, does it also fall under the power of Section 91? If the answer is no, then it is a provincial area of jurisdiction. However, if the answer is yes to both questions, then the courts must reconcile the constitution in some way as to figure out which level of government has responsibility for jurisdiction.…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    b) Discuss the ways for dissolution of a partnership. What are the grounds that Raju could use to apply for dissolution of partnership by way of court’s order?…

    • 309 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mad Food Sdn Bhd

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    MF cannot form a normal partnership firm because according to Partnership act 1961, the maximum number of partnership is 20 members unless it is a professional partnership, so MF only can form limited liability partnership. According to Section 6 of LLP Act 2012, any two or more persons, consisting of individuals or bodies corporate, associated for carrying on any lawful business with a view to profit may form a limited liability partnership. Since MF Company want to convert their private limited company into Partnership Company they must convert everything from the private company to limited liability partnership. According to section 30(2) of LLP Act 2012, in relation to a private company converting to a limited liability partnership, means a transfer of the properties, interests, rights, privileges, liabilities, obligations and the undertaking of the private company to the limited liability partnership. MF must convert everything include the original members from the private to partnership. If any members want to leave or to join the company must wait until fully the company convert into LLP firm.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays