law project
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Academic Integrity declaration......................................................................2
2. Acknowledgement …………………………………………………….……3
3. Abstract…………………………………...……………………………….…5
4. Relevant provision…………………………………………………….........6
5. Facts of the case…………………………………………………………….9
6. Language of the court…………………………..…………………………..10
7. Recent judgement………………………………………………………......14
8. Conclusion………………………………………………………………….15
9. References………………………………………………………………..…16
ABSTRACT
This project work is a case study of Madhu limaye vs Ved murti which deals with official language to be used in court is to be English as mentioned in article 348 for the smooth functioning of administration but tit is not possible for a multi lingual country to adopt language s easily. This project deals with how courts have allowed regional language in many case. This project starts with introduction then to facts of the case, later giving various judgment with expecting of article 348. Later proceeding with recent judgment given in Hindi. And then ending it with short conclusion.
RELEVANT PROVISION
Article 32
Remedies for enforcement of rights conferred by this Part
(1) The right to move the Supreme Court by appropriate proceedings for the enforcement of the rights conferred by this Part is guaranteed
(2) The Supreme Court shall have power to issue directions or orders or writs, including writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari, whichever may be appropriate, for the enforcement of any of the rights conferred by this Part
(3) Without prejudice to the powers conferred on the Supreme Court by clause ( 1 ) and ( 2 ), Parliament may by law empower any other court to exercise within the local limits of its jurisdiction all or any of the powers exercisable by the Supreme Court under clause ( 2 )
(4) The right guaranteed by this article shall not
1. Academic Integrity declaration......................................................................2
2. Acknowledgement …………………………………………………….……3
3. Abstract…………………………………...……………………………….…5
4. Relevant provision…………………………………………………….........6
5. Facts of the case…………………………………………………………….9
6. Language of the court…………………………..…………………………..10
7. Recent judgement………………………………………………………......14
8. Conclusion………………………………………………………………….15
9. References………………………………………………………………..…16
ABSTRACT
This project work is a case study of Madhu limaye vs Ved murti which deals with official language to be used in court is to be English as mentioned in article 348 for the smooth functioning of administration but tit is not possible for a multi lingual country to adopt language s easily. This project deals with how courts have allowed regional language in many case. This project starts with introduction then to facts of the case, later giving various judgment with expecting of article 348. Later proceeding with recent judgment given in Hindi. And then ending it with short conclusion.
RELEVANT PROVISION
Article 32
Remedies for enforcement of rights conferred by this Part
(1) The right to move the Supreme Court by appropriate proceedings for the enforcement of the rights conferred by this Part is guaranteed
(2) The Supreme Court shall have power to issue directions or orders or writs, including writs in the nature of habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari, whichever may be appropriate, for the enforcement of any of the rights conferred by this Part
(3) Without prejudice to the powers conferred on the Supreme Court by clause ( 1 ) and ( 2 ), Parliament may by law empower any other court to exercise within the local limits of its jurisdiction all or any of the powers exercisable by the Supreme Court under clause ( 2 )
(4) The right guaranteed by this article shall not