Preview

Law of Sale of Goods (Part I)

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
6022 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Law of Sale of Goods (Part I)
Topic

12
1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

Law of Sale of Goods (Part I)

LEARNING OUTCOMES
By the end of this topic, you should be able to: Define the meaning of goods; Describe the classification of goods; Differentiate a contract of sale and an agreement to sell; Explain the implied terms in a contract of sale of goods; and Identify the importance of transfer of property in the goods.

INTRODUCTION
The Sale of Goods Act 1957 (Revised 1989) is the statute applicable to sale of goods in Peninsular Malaysia. For Sabah and Sarawak, the law of sale of goods is governed by Section 5(2) of the Civil Law Act 1956. It provides that: „The law to be administered shall be the same as would be administered in England in the like case at the corresponding period.‰ In effect, Sabah and Sarawak continue to apply principles of English law relating to the sale of goods. The Sale of Goods Act 1957 was enacted based on the English Sale of Goods Act 1893 (which was replaced by the Sale of Goods Act 1979). The Sale of Goods Act 1957 applies to contracts for the sale of all types of goods including second-hand goods, and to commercial and private sales, wholesale and retail. The general law of contract will continue to apply to contracts for the sale of goods as Section 3 of the Sale of Goods Act 1957 expressly provides for the continual application to contracts for the sale of goods of the

198

TOPIC 12

LAW OF SALE OF GOODS (PART I)

provisions of the Contracts Act 1950 „in so far as they are not inconsistent with the express provision of this Act‰.

12.1

DEFINITION OF GOODS

Goods under Section 2 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1957 means „every kind of movable property other than actionable claims and money and includes stocks and shares, growing crops, grass, and things attached to or forming part of the land which agreed to be severed before sale or under the contract of sale.‰ In Section 6 of the Sale of Goods Act 1957, goods which form the subject of a contract of sale may be either existing

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    1. The Seller will sell, transfer and deliver to the Purchaser, at his place of business, on or before June 1, 2007, the following goods (the 'Goods'):…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    PASS 2 UNIT 3 A

    • 840 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Sale of Goods act 1979 – All goods must meet the main three criteria. The goods must be as described, of satisfaction quality and fit for purpose. If the seller does not meet the criteria they are breaching the contract and the buyer will have to claim under the Sale of Good Act 1979…

    • 840 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    LP 5.1

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A “sale” defined in the UCC Article 2 Section 2-106 consists of the passing of title from the seller to the buyer fr a price.…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit 3 - P2

    • 1921 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The sales of goods act 1979 is one of the most important asks which all businesses are obliged to follow. The sales of goods act states that business must only sell goods that are as described in marketing (packaging, advertisements, etc.) This means businesses cannot advertise an Apple iMac and then sell a Pear iMac to their customers. Another part of the sale of goods act which businesses have to follow is the part of the act which states that products must be ‘of satisfactory quality’; this means that businesses can only sell products which are of decent quality and not products which wall fall apart when used on first instance. Businesses must ensure that all of their products are described accurately so that they do not fail to follow this act. If a business’s product is not deemed to pass this regulation then the business must substantiate any claims that are made against their products.…

    • 1921 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Sale of Goods Act lays down several conditions that all goods sold by a trader must meet.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This Act refers to the goods and products given or sold by business. The Act requires that all goods must be:…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business p2 unit 2

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The sales of goods act just implies that the business must ensure all their products are satisfactory and they sell goods to their requirements and it must meet the description.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1.Eagle Stores, Inc. borrows $5,000 each from EZ Loan Corporation, First National Bank, and Great Products Corporation. Eagle uses its "present inventory and any thereafter acquired" to secure the loans from EZ Loan and First National. EZ Loan perfects its interest on April 1, followed by First National on April 5. Eagle buys new inventory on April 10 from Great Products and signs a security agreement, giving Great Products a purchase-money security interest (PMSI) in the new inventory. On the same day, Great Products perfects its interest and notifies EZ Loan and First National. Eagle takes possession of the new inventory on April 15. On April 20, Eagle defaults on all of the loans.…

    • 1963 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The sales of goods act requires traders to sell goods that are as the described and advertised. The product must also be of satisfactory quality.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Referring to the Sale of Goods Act there are two types of contract. One of them is sale and the other one is agreement to sell. Sale is when the ownership of the goods transfers to the buyer at the time of sale. Agreement to sell is the transfer of ownership takes place some time after the contract is agreed. When sale happens the buyer has real rights which can be used against everyone that means full rights. But in the case of agreement to sell the buyer has only personal rights. It is good only against the seller.…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 21 P1

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages

    (Make sure you describe the Sale of Goods Act 19. Include quality and fitness for purpose; make sure you relate to the goods you have chosen.)…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Article 2 of the Code applies only to transactions in goods. The sale of goods is the transfer of ownership to tangible personal property in exchange for money, other goods or the performance of services. The law of sales of goods is codified in Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code While the law of sales is based on the fundamental principles of contract and personal property it has been modified to accommodate current practices of merchants. Therefore, the situation depends on whether or not a contract is for the sale of goods. If it is not, then the principles of common law that were discussed in Part 3, Contracts, apply. If the contract is one for the sale of goods, then the Code applies.…

    • 2318 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In which of the following areas does the Sale of Goods Act not imply terms?…

    • 1253 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Commercial Law Autosaved

    • 1086 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It is considered when guests check in to the hotel for the first time, they must know the hotel is not responsible for valuables loss. In case if these are not given to the front desk for safe keeping their stuff, but guests maybe do not know about the exemption clause. In this example in case of losses their belongings, guests have the right to sue the hotel because they stay in a hotel for a first time, which is the most important and also, because of responsibility of the hotel conducted. In James case, the hotel is not responsible for his losses as he is a frequent visitor to Singapore and have always stayed at this particular hotel. Therefore the low of past dealing does not justify James and it is not possible to sue the hotel for him.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apparat V Dali

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The issue is whether Apparat Pty Ltd can take legal action against Dali. In this case, Apparat as a retailer who sells expensive imported sports car has engaged Dali an advertisement agency to advertise his product on a TV station. The agreement agreed to be last for two years. It is said that Apparat wants to cancelled that week’s advertisement slots after knowing that the TV station was planning to run a movie based around the search for the wealthy driver who carelessly knocks down children, killed them and callously drives off which is scheduled to be run on Sunday night. However, Dali neglects to do so. In the agreement, it is stated that Apparat would have the right at any time up to 4 days prior to the broadcasting date to cancel any particular booking. Hence, Apparat should phoned Dali to cancel that week’s slot before Tuesday since the movie was planned to run on Sunday night. The word used in the case given as ‘planning to run a movie’ shows that the TV station have not yet to confirmed whether to broadcast the movie on Sunday night or not. Hence, as long as Apparat follows the rules of the agreement which is to cancelled any booking prior up to 4 days before the advertisement will be broadcast, here therefore the booking can be cancelled. However, since Dali neglects to called off the advertisement on that week, Apparat has experienced losses with the declining sales plus with his reputation as a retailer has been damaged. Thus, Dali is said to breach the contract by neglecting Apparat’s request.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays