Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Law of Precedent

Good Essays
1372 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Law of Precedent
Law of Precedent

One of the major considerations on how someone is tried in a court of law depends upon the previous convictions of similar cases. This law of precedent (stare decisis) was founded hundreds of years ago as part of our common law. The literal translation of stare decisis is "that like cases be decided alike." Precedents in law play a fundamental role in the judicial processes of Canada. From stealing a loaf of bread ranging to murder in the first degree, there are precedents for any type of case that has ever occurred in Canada, and even many cases from Britain (prior to 1949 and the abolishment of the JCPC). Unfortunately, the law of precedent does have its downfalls.

Despite the fall backs of stare decisis, the law of precedent still holds true and important in our modern society. Some of the shortcomings of stare decisis are the following: As time changes, precedents need to change in order to accommodate society's new values and laws. Furthermore, the introduction of
"social facts" in court cases has clouded over many existing precedents with many new facts and ideas that render the basics of stare decisis much more complicated. One of the more common drawbacks to the law of precedent is that over time, a law may be found as no longer applicable, or on the other hand, a new decision may be found in a trial which can also be undesirable. Keep in mind that the courts are not supposed to create new policies to deal with new problems, that is the role of the legislature. This drawback is prevalent in two forms: The first is the ruling of a court case, and the second is the sentencing or judicial decision of a case.

In order to examine the first form an example is given. A long time ago, sexual harassment at the work place was virtually unheard of or it was ignored altogether. The case probably would not even make it to court. Nowadays if a boss (traditionally a man) simply inquires about an employee's sexual status
(traditionally the woman) is considered sexual harassment, and the boss would be found guilty of the charge. This is a classic example of the changing views of society. Sixty plus years ago, women seemingly meant nothing to the world. They were considered tools, possessions, and frequently were not referred to at all by the law. However, with the long battle for the realization of woman's rights, females have become respected by our society and our laws. Unfortunately, sexual harassment at the workplace is going too far. It used to be a threat of one's job in return for sexual favors to qualify as quid pro quo harassment. Yet in today's context, simply inquiring about an employee's sexual status is de emed as sexual harassment.

There are problems with old laws and precedents that may need to be rectified. Previous decisions by judges do not necessarily embody the law. Here is where a judge's duty is to apply the law, not another justice's determination of it. "The law and the opinion of the judge may not always be one and the same." For judges, it is important to correct any precedent that is now viewed as a mistake. Making sure that precedents are kept "in check" is a vital role of the courts.

The second case of changing precedent is that of court sentencing and decision making. This part of stare decisis troubles many people along with myself for a good reason, court cases are getting out of hand! Here offered is another example. Fifty years ago, a convicted serial killer would have been hung by the laws of capital punishment. Yet nowadays, the taking of a convicted killer's life is deemed as cruel and unusual punishment, even if he murdered the
Prime Minister on national television. If that example is too drastic, here is another, more reasonable example. In the United States, court rulings dealing with personal injury or damages are becoming out of this world. Here are a couple of examples: A lady gets 8 million dollars for spilling hot coffee from
McDonalds' on herself; O.J. Simpson is out a total of 33 million dollars for the wrongful deaths of Nicole Brown-Simpson and Ronald Goldman. These rulings are ludicrous! If one chooses to say that is the States and not Canada, how about the Br ian Mulroney's attempt to sue Canada for 55 million dollars due to slanderous remarks that were allegedly made by his fellow politicians and
Canadian citizens? How much further must society "progress" (and this term is used very loosely) before a life sentence of 25 years for a convicted killer is deemed as cruel and unusual? With such continuing changes in the precedents due to an ever developing society, it will not be long before our court system has gone too far with its rulings. Yet the only solution that seems likely is to put a "cap" on sentencing and judicial decisions. We currently do have such "caps" yet they seem to be stretching ever so consistently.

A recent and very big complication in the law of precedent is the notion of "social facts." Spawned from the United States, social facts, "which are general patterns of human behavior," only came into Canada in the 1970's. The use of social facts in a court case was greatly increased by the enactment of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in 1982. A few problems have arisen in the judicial process and the application stare decisis due to social facts. When social facts are weighed against historical or adjudicative facts in a court case, conflicting solutions may occur. This means that when looking specifically at the historical facts, a judge may use a precedent to guide his or her ruling, however, once adding social facts to the case (by use of expert witnesses, statistics, etc.) the decision of that case may no longer be cut and dry. There may be certain circumstances or extraneous variables that have come to play a vital role in the decision of a trial. Therefore, the use of a precedent may be inappropriate. This is a problem because even though social facts may change the view of a case, stare decisis obliges a court to apply precedent to a case even though it is wrong. "Whether the present case resembles the plain case ‘sufficiently' and in the ‘relevant' aspects" is what judges need to decide with the twist of extrinsic evidence. With the addition of social facts to the judicial system, stare decisis is "no longer an article of faith."

Before too much criticism is allowed regarding the law of precedent, one must ask if there is a more feasible solution. As far as I can see, there is not. There are a myriad of important uses and applications for stare decisis. It uses "past experience to guide present conduct." It promotes the rule of law, not men. The law of precedent also minimizes judicial discretion and creativity. This is a major benefit that the Canadian judicial system has over that of the
American's. As Americans see precedents as only a "cogent principle," the judges are much more free in their decision making. This can lead to a bias in the delivering of fair justice to the people. Stare decisis is also an instrument of stability that assures equality in the law. A vital aspect for civilized societies is the certainty and continuity of the law.

The law of precedent has managed to stay intact and active despite the changes and challenges of society over hundreds of years. Yet as there is no guarantee that what is law today will still be a valid law tomorrow. Despite this possibility, stare decisis has managed to maintain a firm foothold in our judicial system. After a brief view of the pros and cons of stare decisis, one will find that the law of precedents is not perfect, however it is the best solution to the problem of administering justice fairly in our society. "For a law with no certainty is no law at all."

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Law

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages

    * SIMPKIN v PAYS ( Law of Contract: Intention to create legal relation m/s 20)…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Default Judgment 5. Direct Examination 6. Discovery 7. Motion 8. Opening Statement 9.…

    • 18216 Words
    • 73 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    •legal decisions were also now influenced by the judges’ interpretation of previous court decisions; this made rulings more consistent so that the same crime couldn’t be punished in two different ways…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Law Fact Pattern

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Owning a business is very rewarding, however, it comes with many challenges as well. There are many torts and laws a business owner should be aware of in order to make sure they are abiding by the laws set forth before them. The characters have found themselves in a wide variety of situations that must be dealt with and handled accordingly.…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law and Case

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Legal research is not only about discovering how the law applies, it is also about determining how strong case is. Using legal research we are analyzing strength and weaknesses of client’s case, and using counteranalysis we determine how opponent can use weaknesses against us. In this paper we will establish why counteranalysis is important and why do we use it, when we use it and where we can apply it.…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conflict In The Crucible

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Therefore the court is forced to make a decision to attempt to get one or some of these…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Palko Case Summary

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages

    courts of the United States. As the times change and cases are reviewed, the ruling for a…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When a judge has to make a decision on a sentence it can be a very difficult…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    jury’s decision is not just based on evidence, as it should be, but on other external factors as well.…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is often believed that the relationship between certainty and flexibility in judicial precedent has struck a fine line between being necessary and being precarious. The problem is that these two concepts of judicial precedent are seen as working against each other and not in tandem. There is proof, however, that as contrasting as they are on the surface they are actually working together to achieve one common goal.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Law

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What is an Ambulatory Surgery Center? It is a medical facility which is designed in order for people to be able to have elective same-day surgeries rather than having to deal with the amount of traffic which most hospitals have. Since it is not a hospital, it does not have emergency care. A facility such as this would mean that a patient does not have to stay overnight as they would if admitted to a hospital. The patient is able to go home once the procedure is complete. This type of organization does have a lot of legal issues; and some of those legal issues will be read about in this paper; issues that deal with physician ownership, Medicare cases, and even out of network waivers. A surgical center takes a lot of endeavor in running a surgical center as well as learning what type of legal issues might be included when running this type of a center.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court Observation

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages

    fair and unbiased trial can be heard so that it would not cause any disadvantage…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Judicial Precedent

    • 1582 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Lord Devlin, a famous House of Lords judge, has said that trial by jury is the “lamp that shows that freedom lives”, arguing that a defendant has the right to be tried by his peers.…

    • 1582 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Criminal Trial Process

    • 3916 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Whether the matter is being heard for the first time or whether it involves an appeal…

    • 3916 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Law of Case Studies

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1) Review the motivation theories discussed in this chapter. How would each one describe and explain the problems with Simon Lucas’s motivation?…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays