Preview

law and evidence guidance

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
597 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
law and evidence guidance
QUESTION

The House of Lords seemed to have settled the “golden rule” in Lord Sankey’s judgment in Woolmington v DPP [1935] AC 462, that in criminal cases, the prosecution always bears the legal burden of proof. Consider the proposition (statement) that the rule itself, and the current state of the law means that the rule is not as clear-cut as Lord Sankey would make us believe.
What is the current state of the law that affects the thinking of lord Sankey.

Is it the case that an intrusion into the “golden rule” denies the accused his right to a fair trial and the presumption of innocence? This means if golden rule not used therefore, burdern proof n defendant, therefore this effects his rights of a fair trail and is not presumped innocent.

ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONS

1. The word limit for the Evidence coursework assessment is 3000 words. This is the absolute maximum number of words permissible. Any words in excess of this limit will not be marked. You must certify the total number of words used at the end of your answer. The citation of cases, case names, statutes and books/articles in footnotes does not count towards this limit. However, footnotes containing any explanation, discussion or other similar text will count towards the word limit.

2. The reasons why we have a short, strict word limit are to:

a. Ensure that all assignments are judged on an equal footing.
b. Reflect the fact that while coursework is an important element in the assessment of the unit, it should not take up a disproportionate amount of a student’s time.
c. Encourage conciseness.

3. The submission date for your coursework assessment is published via Moodle. Work can, of course, be submitted early. Your work should be handed in the normal way.

If you are unable to submit your work on time, it will be subject to a penalty unless you can provide satisfactory evidence of exceptional factors. Please refer to the Student Hub for further guidance.

4. Your

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    One of the main areas pointed out by the Law Commission was the bit by bit development of the law leading to a lack of coherence. This lack of coherence can be seen in the uncertain meaning of ‘intention’. Intention is a vital element of murder in regards to proving D having the sufficient mens rea. Despite multiple attempts by the House of Lords to explain what effect foresight of consequences has; s8 CJA 1967 it is still unclear. In Moloney it was ruled foresight of consequences was not intention; it was only evidence from which intention could be inferred. However, in the case of Woolin the HoL spoke of intention being found from foresight of consequences. This left it unclear whether it is a substantive rule of law or a rule of evidence and the following case of Mathews ad Alleyne confused matters more after stating there was little difference between the two. In my view this could be resolved if a definition of foresight of consequences was provided in a statutory definition; making applying the law easier for jury’s.…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nix V. Williams Summary

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Evidence that is obtained through unlawful police conduct that would have been discovered inevitably during the course of an investigation does not have to be excluded from trial…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ring Vs Arizona Case Study

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages

    "But the doctrine is not unyielding: we have overturned prior decisions when there is strong reason for setting the law straight. This is such a case," she said.…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    • Late Papers: As stated on the syllabus, assignments may be submitted up to one week late but…

    • 1001 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Mere Evidence” The Exclusionary Rule  Determining What is Inadmissible – Fruit of the Poisonous…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In a fair trial, both the defendant and the accuser swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. This cannot occur if the defendant tells the attorney of the heinous crime, and the attorney covers up the tracks for his guilty client. This breaks the oath by not telling the whole truth under oath, and May possibly let a guilty man be let free even tough he is in all rights guilty. The privileged even excludes evidence that is related to but not necessarily a part of what is covered in by the privilege. As a democracy the U.S is formed…

    • 2385 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    jeopardy prevents a person from being tried twice for the same crime. Finally, due process…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Fifth Amendment: If an Aid to the Guilty Defendant, an Impediment to the Innocent One…

    • 4738 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “ ‘Gentlemen of the jury, be merciful. For God’s sake, be merciful. He is innocent of all charges brought against him’” (Gains 8).…

    • 1912 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. Bailii. United kingdom house of lords decisions. Daniel m’naghten’s case (1843). Retrieved from http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1843/J16.html…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Courts

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Due to the rising dissatisfaction the American courts have carefully expanded mandatory disclosure by the prosecutor, especially with respect to disclosures of exculpatory evidence and impeachment material. Exculpatory evidence is any evidence that might exonerate the defendant at trial by either tending to cast doubt on defendant’s guilt or by tending to mitigate the defendant’s culpability, thereby potentially reducing the defendant’s sentence (David W. Neubauer & Henry F. Fradella). In Brady v. Maryland, he U.S Supreme Court held that “the suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused upon request violates due process where the evidence is material either to guilt or punishment, irrespective of the good faith r bad faith of the prosecution”. This is commonly referred to as Brady rule. The Brady rule applies to material exculpatory evidence only. Exculpatory evidence is material only if there is a reasonable probability that had the evidence been disclosed to the defense the result of the proceeding would have been different (David W. Neubauer & Henry F. Fradella).…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Furthermore, In paragraph seven it tells how Forensic evidence is important. “Seldom is guilt proved or blame assessed with…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kant’s Formalism Theory

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As I apply this theory to Warner Case #5, I see that the Prosecuting Attorney will have to follow his judgment on all cases with the same manner. If he chooses not to disclose the bad guy’s evidence he will have to follow the same universal law on all other cases, no matter the possible outcome.…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    And, as Spigelman CJ has recently reminded us, the method of common law systems demands that lawyers ‘acknowledge and respect the collective wisdom of our predecessors’,[6] a comment that is, of course, as applicable in…

    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Coercive Interrogation

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It has always been “Innocent until proven guilty,” yet in some opinions it has turned into “Guilty until proven innocent.” Every year thousands of people are convicted of crimes that they have committed. However, as that notion is true every year many people are wrongfully convicted of crimes that they have not committed. How do these injustices occur? Much of the time, this occurs because detectives decide they have the correct assailant, and they must receive a confession from that person at all costs. This turns into coercion. Improper interrogation and coercion do not allow for a trial to be properly conducted because they can lead to wrongful conviction of the innocent.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays