Preview

Law 310 Week 6 Case Studt

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
307 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Law 310 Week 6 Case Studt
What problems do you think Dr. Patel might see with the fact that you have taken the property under a quitclaim deed?
A quitclaim deed gives no covenant of title. A quitclaim deed says: “I am conveying to you any interest I have in this property. I don’t know what other interests there may be.” This means that you may be taking on burdens of the past, such as a mortgage, attachment, judgment lien, or any other interest in real property un-knowingly. Therefore, if I default on the loan taken from Dr. Patel and he take’s ownership of the land and attempts sell it to get his money back, the land may not be worth what was lent because the property may have past interests.
What would be the difference if Grandma had given you a warranty deed?
When granting a warranty deed "The grantor covenants with the grantee that he is lawfully seized in fee simple of the granted premises; that the same are free from all encumbrances except as therein set forth, that he has good right, full power and lawful authority to sell and convey the same to the grantee and that the grantor shall, and his heirs, executors and administrators shall, warrant and defend the same to the grantee and his heirs and assigns forever against the claims and demands of all persons except as therein set forth." Having a warranty deed would ensure to myself as well as Mr. Patel what the exact, if any interests the family farm holds. You will know what the property is worth and Mr. Patel would be reassured that the property is worth the investment. This would be a fee simple and Mr. Patel and I would know there where no conditions of owning the property, we could do with it what we

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Brief 11.2

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page

    Lester Cooper and Julie Smith were engaged, Lester gave various gifts to both Julie & Janet Smith while living in Janet’s house. Later they had a disagreement causing the engagement to break off and Cooper desired his gifts given back. Julie gave back only the engagement ring. Cooper subsequently sued the Smith’s.…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law 310

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Laffey v. Northwest Airlines 567 F.2d 429 (U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, 1976)…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. How does John’s outlook about receiving help affect his ability to get his needs met?…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I corrected your cover page – all I had to do was center the five lines on the cover page and delete some spacing between the lines. Citations are not correct, spacing is a problem, basic keyboarding problems with a space before a period at the end of a sentence and a space before a comma within a sentence.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Law 531 Case 5.1

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The results from the surveys conducted concluded that the food at Lucky Cheng’s rated a 9 and in the category of décor and service a 15; scores could range from 0-30. Keeping in mind the results came directly from consumers…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Widget Tech Inc. is in need of update the company’s current code of ethics due to growth of the company and the changing workforce. Research has been conducted to revise the current policy and address topics that were previously overlooked. Widget Tech Inc. is a company that stresses both corporate and personal integrity. We not only comply with laws and applicable regulations; but we also strive to conduct our affairs according to the highest ethical standards. Employees are expected to be honest and forthright in dealings with managers, subordinates and with one another, as well as with clients, suppliers, government agencies and their employees, business partners and the general public. Widget Tech employees must maintain the highest level of personal integrity and encourage it in others; they must not lie, cheat, steal or do anything that would bring dishonor upon themselves or the company (SRA International, Inc. 2009).…

    • 1178 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    (Tenn.Ct.App., 2008). In this case the following facts were argued: The dispute arose over a strip of land located on the northern side of Underwood Repair Service's property Lot 1 and the southern side of the Deans' property Lot 2. Underwood Repair Service asserted that it owned the disputed strip of land in fee simple, or, in the alternative, through adverse possession. The Deans filed a motion to dismiss both claims, and the trial court granted the motion to dismiss the adverse possession claim, finding…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Litigation Unit 3

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS JUSTIN WILLIAM KING, ) ) Plaintiff. ) ) ) v. ) ) ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES, INC. ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) COMPLAINT Comes Now the plaintiff, Justin King, by and through his attorney, states as follows: PARTIES AND JURISDICTION 1. Plaintiff, for all times mentioned herein, was and is a resident of Cook County, State of Illinois. 2. Defendant is a corporation with its principal place of business in Missouri and carries on business in Illinois. 3. This court has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims presented in this complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because plaintiff is a resident of Illinois and the defendant is a citizen of Missouri and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive of fees and costs. 4. Personal jurisdiction and venue are proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391 because the acts of defendant caused harm to plaintiff in Cook County, in United States Court for the Northern District of Illinois. COUNT I: ________ 5. On or about April 8, 2011, plaintiff Justin King, while in the exercise of due care, was operating his motorcycle on Interstate 57, heading in a south direction, in the City of Paxton, Illinois. 6. On the occasion in question, defendant, Frank Cuellar, a resident of Illinois, was operating a truck owned by Anheuser-Busch as its agent, and was traveling in a south direction on Interstate 57, so called, a public highway in the City of Paxton, Illinois. 7. On the occasion in question, plaintiff Justin King was traveling south on Interstate 57 in Paxton, IL on his motorcycle when he noticed a truck with Anheuser-Busch logo traveling behind him headed in the same direction. The plaintiff noticed Mr. Cuellar flashing his headlights requesting to pass the plaintiff and proceeded to switch lanes. Justin King then changed lanes to the right hand lane…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law 310

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to Chapter 2, “Section 406 defines a code of ethics as written standards that are reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote such behaviors as honest conduct, full disclosure in reports, compliance with all applicable laws and rules, prompt reporting of violations and methods for conforming to the code’s expectations.” Seeing that rules forbid them to hand out personal information they are stuck between two situations which could cause a dramatic outcome. On one side you have investigator trying to find a link as to where the cancer might have come from or began. On the other side before you allow an employee to purse a position with your company they signed a privacy contract to keep all there information private. Giving away this…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most importantly, Mary started a good job after moving to 12 Pudding Lane. She had been working for a local firm known as the Signatures and Technicals. In Might 2016, this company had planned to close all the business actions and the activities of the company. Mary has been unable to have a new job, she has already applied to several employment applications. Because of this critical factor, she has defaulted on her mortgage reimbursements. This has become a crucial issue with respect to the mortgage. Mary has been searching and looking for a new job as soon as possible but she is unable to do so. Showstopper Bank has planned to claim the ownership of 12 Pudding Lane, prior to the sale. They need the recommendations…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Boulton is the sole legal title holder of Yantabulla and is holding the property on a bare trust for the adult beneficiaries Anna and Colman as well as himself. Anna, Boulton and Colman each have a beneficiary interest in the property, having contributed £60,000 to the purchase price and it is an equitable interest as per s.1(1(3)) of the Law of Property Act 1925. Colman can prove his equitable beneficiary interest in the property because he contributed to the purchase price, he relied on the promise of buying the house in order to renovate and sell and we can prove there was a common understanding between the parties as to the plans for the house. Boulton cannot do anything with the property simply because he is the legal title holder. He does also have an equitable beneficiary interest but he also has a duty to act alongside the other beneficiaries’ interests.…

    • 2991 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Land Law

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    in the land and therefore, from this, becomes the equitable owner of the land and the seller holds…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2. Copies of all previous title deeds & link documents establishing chain of title upto present seller…

    • 9996 Words
    • 40 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A claimed that the lien had been lost when R departed with the title. He wants R to withdraw his caveat so that cross-transfer can be executed. (Because there was caveat, registration of transfer was refused.)…

    • 554 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This Conditional Deed of Sale Agreement is a fact signed by two parties, the FIRST PARTY is the owner/seller (represented by FRANCISCO SAN PEDRO, JR.) a Filipino citizen, of legal age, married residing at Biñang First, Bocaue, Bulacan; and the SECOND PARTY is the Buyer( in the name of RICARDO STA. ANA, JR.) a Filipino citizen, of legal age, married and resident of Dalandanan, City of Valenzuela, Metro Manila ; and of which the subject is a parcel of land specifically described as to wit:…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays