Preview

Laissez Faire

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1826 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Laissez Faire
I don't view laissez-faire as the best economic system. In fact, under it the economy would suffer and only the big businesses would thrive. Laissez-faire is an economic theory which states that there is an Invisible Hand guiding the economy, thus there is no need for government involvement. The Invisible Hand refers to uncontrolled competition, with greed as the major factor, in fact it is considered by some to be the purest form of competition due to the fact that laissez-faire is basically the economic version of Darwin's survival of the fittest theory. He who is best will prevails, in theory anyway. The theory asserts that economy is capable of being its own guardian. An example of this is when two businesses produce similar products. Laissez-faire supposes that each business will begin to make better and cheaper products in order to overcome its competition and earn more of a profit. As they do that, they will be fulfilling society's need for that product. The businesses are not producing the products out of social responsibility or as a result of some sort of government involvement. Their sole motivator is money, yet they are still producing superior products for less, which is beneficial for the consumers. I think government should have a limited role in the economy, it should regulate it just enough to keep it stable. In laissez faire big business is basically allowed to do whatever it wants, short of murder without any legal ramifications. If big businesses are allowed to grow unrestrained they will most likely do so until monopolies are the only form of business left. If this happens there is nothing to stop these monopolies from taking advantage of the consumers who in the end would end up having no choice but to shell out large amounts of money for any and most likely all products produced by those monopolies. The way that big business would go about doing this in a laissez-faire system is by driving its competitors out of business. Big business

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    There are a few reasons why governments may decide to intervene in the economy. The decisions governments take are called government policies and these may have a positive or negative effect on business operations. Governments put these policies in place with an overall aim to achieve an increase in income, encourage economic growth within the country and control aggregate demand. For example, governments may decide to take over manufacturing in order to maximise outputs or put stricter control and rules on protecting the environment. Other policies they can put in place can be to do with lowering employment within an economy by reducing benefits to…

    • 3033 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Laissez Faire has always held up an ideal that if one works hard towards a goal, success…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the early years of American history, most political leaders were reluctant to involve the federal government too heavily in the private sector, except in the area of transportation. In general, they accepted the concept of laissez-faire, a doctrine opposing government interference in the economy except to maintain law and order. This attitude started to change during the latter part of the 19th century, when small business, farm, and labor movements began asking the government to intercede on their behalf.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the Civil War, many businessmen endorsed the Laissez-Faire concept of government in order to promote industry. In this concept, government did not interfere with industry. But what came with this concept was unlimited freedom for businessmen and high prices for consumers. While many businessmen supported a Laissez-Faire concept of government between 1865 and 1900, the people did not benefit from it, which led government to violate this concept with their policies, but only to a moderate extent overall. They violated laissez-faire to a moderate extent by issuing Railroad Land Grants before 1870 and eliminating them after, to a great extent by Regulating Interstate Commerce with the Interstate Commerce Act in 1886, and only to a limited extent by attempting to control trust activities with the Sherman Antitrust Act in 1890, producing a moderate government involvement overall.…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The principle of laissez faire is that the an unobtrusive government is the best government; that the government necessarily only 'maintain domestic tranquillity, defend the people from invasion, and protect them when travelling.' To leave economic workings of the country to the people and let the 'motives for production' be that of the people not the government. Our government took such a stance in its early decades, but as national debt rose, interstate commerce became indomitable, and the economy lost its strength, the need to patch the economy became very important. The government found that the needed patch was much more important than the laissez faire freedom previously given to monopolistic trusts, who were loosing favor with the majority of the lower class, who shared on 50% of the nation's wealth. As an attempt to end all that ailed the country the government began limiting land grants, instituting interstate commerce laws, and passing anti-trust bills, like The Sherman Anti-Trust Bill.…

    • 711 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One big task for the government is that it deals with externalities. The economy on its own won’t do well because the ordinary person would try to save by cutting corners to maximize personal benefit and when that happens, social benefit drops. This is basically having people aiding themselves with others money. This theory also works vice-versa. That’s why the government is a valuable part…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Econ Paper #4

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the beginning there was no intention for the government to have a hand in business. The government wanted businesses to act on their own best interests without any involvement from the government. Regulation was brought about to enhance the public and take care of those that have lost or investigate those who have cheated. For many years there was no government regulation and as time progressed the need for it became apparent. Regulation has a lot of costs and a lot of benefits. The government likes to keep them efficient by making sure the benefits of them outweigh the cost. It isn’t cheap to have these regulations in place but it is what is needed to make sure that companies are doing the right things. The following are roles of government: protecting business property and enforcing business contracts, setting and collecting taxes. The government would provide fire, police and military protection under protecting business property. The government would issues trademarks to businesses to protect their products, copyrights to artists and writers to protect creations, and patents to inventors to give them control of their inventions. Within the soft drink industry government regulation is much needed due to the fact that child obesity is on the rise. The role of government in business has changed and evolved since the country was born. The government is involved in business to provide public goods; to protect public health and welfare; to stabilize the economy; to protect businesses, consumers, investors, and competition; to conserve the environment; to regulate working conditions; and to protect business property. Both state and federal laws govern mergers and acquisitions. State laws set the procedures for the approval of mergers and establish judicial oversight for the terms of mergers to ensure shareholders of the targeted company receive…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Apush- Monopolies

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During this era, the government practiced laissez-faire, an ideology that called for minimal government regulation of economic affairs. The government did not interfere with these monopolies and their negative impact on the economy. The railroads were viewed as one of the largest monopolies during this time. The railroad corporations could lower wages, provide bad working conditions, and fire workers without justification. When the government did take action in these affairs, they usually favored the corrupt…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Yes, there should be government intervention in to capitalistic system with some extent. I my opinion markets cannot exist without a government to protect property rights, enforce contracts and settle disputes all of which is intervention. This would benefit the economy in variety of ways. Firstly, government regulations allow businesses to remain in the private hands while removing some of the worst abuses of pure capitalism. Extremely wealthy people or companies have the ability to control large sections of the economy because smart business dealings. Only Government involvement can fix that. When a producer has a monopoly, the consumer is no longer autonomous, prices are not set by supply and demand, and therefore the system cannot function effectively. As a mixed economy there is competition between companies but we need government regulation to ensure that…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ap Macro

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. What are the main reasons why government should only take a limited role in a market economy?…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    GKE 4

    • 705 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The meaning of capitalism is when the production or the resources are the responsibility of the private owner and the profits belong to the private owner. The rich get richer and the poor get poorer. Laissez-faire capitalism is when businesses are left alone and the government cannot regulate anything a business does, now the businesses rely on supply and demand instead of laws. Factory owners now could set the pay scale, hours, and work environmental conditions that could affect their employees. Business owners had total control and they were happy knowing they had total control. Because the machines were so big and expensive only the rich could afford them, and they could afford to have buildings built big enough to house the machines. Since the profits were good, more people wanted a piece of it. With the new people brought new machines that could produce more and run better With all the factories being built and the new technology, the industrial revolution was booming, this could be seen in Chicago in the mid 1800’s. With the industry booming, the rich were getting richer and the poor were getting poorer. In order to make money the rich continued to invest it. It was not the quality of the product it was the quantity that was important to the business owners. (International, N.D.) (Revolution and the growth of…

    • 705 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Individual enterprises fought diligently to dominate economic affairs but the government was obligated to intervene when unjust activity was apparent. It was unanimously believed, among businessmen, that the government should have very little say in economic issues, the basis for Laissez-Faire. Laissez-Faire was definitely incorporated in every issue concerning government policy. Many people are outraged with the political speakers. The people are saying that the political leaders have misled them. The Interstate Commerce Act was enacted to limit the freedom and wrongful capital gain of railways to benefit the people. The Senate passed the Sherman Antitrust Act, heavily influenced by the monopolies. The purpose of the act was to oppose the combination of entities that could potentially harm…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the year 1865 to 1900 the United States government was attributed to following the standards of laissez-faire, an economic axiom in opposition of governmental moderation of or meddling in commerce beyond the merest essential for a free-enterprise organization to function according to its own economic regulations. The United States government took this stance of noninterference, however, apparent within the guiding principles concerning railroad land grants, management of interstate commerce, as well as antitrust actions we see direct governmental intervention and clear infringement and disruption of laissez-faire ideology.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Free enterprise is the current system used to deal with businesses in the United States government. It is defined as, “an economy that allows private businesses the freedom to organize and operate competitively for a profit without government interference, regulation, or subsidy” (“Free”) by the Gale Encyclopedia of U.S. Economic History. It is an ideology which many government officials agree with, especially Republicans. However, this system makes it too easy for one company to have a monopoly over a whole industry since their antitrust laws are not strict enough, and there are not many regulations restricting overbearing competition, which negatively impacts many small businesses while greatly profiting a few large corporations. For example,…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ECO 203 Week 3 Quiz

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Discuss whether you favor a larger or smaller role of government in the economy. Refer to concepts found in t...…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays