Preview

Lady Justice Thesis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1032 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Lady Justice Thesis
Yuran Liu
English 1A
Professor Wills
Justice
The Statue of Lady Justice is often placed in front of a courthouse. Lady Justice has often been described wearing a blindfold and holding a scale and a sword. The blindfold represents that justice is measured without favor or identity. The balance represents fairness and equality. The sword represents punishment. Lady Justice symbolizes that all people are equal in the eyes of the law. Some people wonder what is justice and who makes the laws of justice. People develop their concept of justice according to their cultural influences and personal experiences which help them to form their concepts on what is right and wrong.
In order to perform a just law everyone should be equal. In John Rawls
…show more content…
In the United States, women and African Americans have benefitted from these changes. They were treated as slaves back then. They had no rights to vote or even receive the most basic equivalences in daily life. For example, women or African Americans were not allowed to sit in certain sections of the bus. They had to give up their places in line to a white person or a man. In Martin Luther King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” King pointed out that “A just law is a code that is majority compels a minority to follow and that is willing to follow itself.” (219) King broke the so called just law because he thought the law was unjust and got arrested. I agree with King’s idea because I think people form a rubric for what is right and wrong which the majority of people approve of, and those minorities of people who are willing to stay in the society have to follow the majority in order to maintain the harmony of the society. But sometimes these laws can be unjust. For example, most people agree that killing or hurting another person is wrong and not allowed, therefore, a law of justice then is created that anyone who kills and hurts another person will be punished. On the other hand, when a person hurts another person in self-defense he or she will not be punished as critical as the first example. But how do we know that killing another person intentionally is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr., born on January 15, 1929, fought for the injustices of his brothers and sisters throughout his life. While being an active activist, Martin Luther King was imprisoned to Birmingham jail due to his participation in a nonviolent demonstration against segregation and discrimination in Alabama. During his sentence, he wrote a letter, “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” to counter the criticisms of his actions from the clergymen by claiming that “An unjust law is no law at all”(par. 12), “Injustice everywhere is a threat to justice…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. King also references St. Augustine who said "an unjust law is no law at all," (King 334). Dr. King also appeals to logos by comparing his disobedience to segregation laws to the rebellion at the Boston Tea Party. This historical allusion gives his claims credit and defend his thinking. Dr. King also uses pathos by describing the torment that many African American people have to go through on a daily basis due to racism and segregation laws. King states that they are "humiliated day in and day out by nagging signs reading 'white' and 'colored'," (King 334). Dr. King defends the protests by explaining why the segregation laws must be overturned and why things need to change soon. He states how African American people are disrespected and "living constantly at tiptoe stance," (King 334). He also describes how many African American people are constantly plagued by fear and hatred and that they feel no worth in society. Through his use of ethos, pathos, and logos Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. effectively explains and defends his actions. He also justifies anyone else who would like to be treated equally in society and would like to protest in a nonviolent…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In his “Letter from Birmingham Jail”, King talks about the difference between unjust and just laws. He tells us that everyone has a moral code to adhere to with accordance the laws that are just. Yet, the laws that are seen as unjust, should be unfollowed by the people. According to King, just law is a moral law or the law of God, whereas unjust law is made up by humans and does not have anything common with eternal and natural law. MLK would advise the people to disobey this act in any way possible, an unjust law is not one that should be followed. MLK was very adamant about this, the laws that are unfair to the people are meant to be disobeyed in order to hopefully change…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social injustice and unjust laws was an important component of King’s letter. He argues that breaking an unjust law, if executed correctly, is a form of respect towards authority and a community. This is because the punishments entailed by breaking an unjust laws, if accepted properly, raise awareness and invoke action for justice. King Jr. uses metaphorical…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr’s dream of equality could have caused change by making people rethink the laws and rights that were set and given in the beginning of the country's existence an example, from the Bill of Rights, of Anti-segregated America’s beginning laws is, …it should not tell people they can get together to protest peacefully… Another example of Anti-segregation could be It should not tell people they can get together to protest peacefully……

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Rights leader Martin Luther King, Jr., in his “Letter to Birmingham Jail”, argues that there are two types of laws: just and unjust. King’s purpose is to explain how a just law should be followed, and how unjust laws, such as segregation, should not. He supports this claim by appealing to logos, ethos, and pathos.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King says, “Hence segregation is not only politically, economically and sociologically unsound, it is morally wrong and sinful”(13). King uses “God Law”(morals) to explain why segregations needs to stop. God always pushes you to do the moral choice, so why have all these church leaders chosen to head down the morally wrong path? The law itself it's okay because it is an unjust law, but it is morally wrong. But what is the difference between a just law and an unjust law? King explains that very well. The clergymen wants to know why they chose to follow some laws and disregard the rest. A just law is any law that makes you a better person, an unjust law does the opposite. That’s why king chose to follow only some laws; he was making the moral choice, and did what was right in his eyes. So when he was protesting, yes it was illegal for him to do, but in his heart it was the right…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Society must protect the robbed, and punish the robber” (King 4). This is yet another statement from King that screams logic. Unfortunately, parts of society back then did not possess the logical capacity to comprehend this concept. In the days when segregation ran rapidly, society decided to throw innocent African American victims away in a putrid jail cell while allowing the real criminals to walk freely. King saw the major flaw in this logic, and marked it down in his letter. In sum, he insisted that society should assist those in need, and punish those who harm others in the name of…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kings theory of justice in society is knowing the difference from right and wrong. His theory as a black gentlemen in the south is to fight against unjust laws. According to King, it is morally acceptable to break an unjust law, because a law that is unjust is considered no law at all. King abides by that injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. He believed in civil disobedience; which meant, to break a law for a moral reason even if it is unjust. It is ethical to break a law if it is unjust, but after breaking it we need to redefine the law to make it morally acceptable to society in which it is just. Another aspect that King believed it was non-violent actions. Non-violent actions was more socially acceptable for the majority to do harmful actions to the minorities. For instance, if the blacks (technical term) protestors were violent against the whites it was considered unjust, but it was just or morally acceptable because the blacks are fighting against an unjust law which, King believes is acceptable in order to bring just amongst the two races.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Martin Luther King Jr., the institution of the courts was difficult to change. In the article “Civil Disobedience” the author talks about how King’s struggle with the judiciary courts. Biased officials had no reason to change, as they “disobey[ed] desegregation laws without regard to their legitimacy or justice” (Suber). Failing to enforce desegregation laws because the majority didn’t want to change. It was required for the minority to rise up in order to create the necessary change. If the African Americans had gone through the legal system, their requests would have been ignored due to the ignorance of the judges at the time. As Martin said, “Justice delayed... is justice denied” (King). If a government claims to have open channels of communication where laws are easy to change when needed, then civil disobedience should not be necessary…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the words of St. Thomas, Martin Luther King quotes, from a jail cell in Birmingham, “An unjust law is no law at all” (King). After an affiliate from Birmingham invited MLK into a non-violent action program, he and along with several members of a staff were put into jail when asked, why MLK was in Birmingham King stated, “Because injustice is here”.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. King strategically breaks down and characterizes acquiescence as a form of dealing with oppression. Through his analysis, King explains how people surrender to oppression and become accustomed to it as a way of living. Creating an atmosphere where the oppressed person learns to live in with oppression and never fully understands what self respect is. ?Religion reminds everyman that he is his brother?s keeper . . .To accept injustice or segregation passively is to say to the oppressor that his actions are morally right.? (King). Therefore, King believes that this lets the oppressor know that their actions are right influencing the oppressor to continue. Dr. King takes into consideration that this is not the best way to deal with oppression. In fact, he criticizes the people who utilize this method. ?To accept passively and in just system is to cooperate with that system; thereby the oppressed become as evil as the oppressor.?(King) Violence, as a method of dealing with oppression that Dr. King strongly diverges with. King assumes that people who resort to violence also influence hatred at the same time. He explains how violence only creates temporary results. Although at times it may be seen as the best way out but he believes that no one should ever degrade themselves to that level of understanding and standard. According to King, violence only creates problems instead of…

    • 1864 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some whites believed the issue was clear and took the view point that African Americans were just a race and should be kept as just a race under the law. Civil rights activists believed that every person was created equal and therefore should be equal under the law. Martin Luther King uses many quotes from historical figures to make argument stonger. This can be applied to the plight of African Americans as natural law would dictate that every person is equal. A just law “is a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God.” Thoreau argues that unjust laws exist yet not all unjust laws should be fought against. He believes “if the injustice is part of the necessary friction of the machine of government, let it go…perchance it will wear smooth--certainly the machine will wear out.” He argues by saying that if the law “is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another, then…break the law.” Through application of this quote to the Civil Rights Movement, we judge whether the fight should have been ignored, or whether the law should have been broken. We can say ‘machine’ is the government of the United States. In addition we can say that whites in government used many tricks to inhibit the advancement of African Americans. History shows injustice which means that Thoreau and King would agree that the law must be broken. The impact of…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Moral Responsibility

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages

    "I am in Birmingham because injustice is here," wrote Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., in his "Letter from Birmingham Jail" (King 416). Eight Alabama clergymen composed a statement urging restraint in the Civil Rights movement and the discontinuance of demonstrations in Birmingham. The clergymen explained that progress could best be achieved through negotiation and through the court system and suggested that direct action would only make the situation worse. In response to this statement, Martin Luther King, Jr. composed his famous “Letter from Birmingham Jail” to explain why he was active in civil rights demonstrations, primarily because of the failure of the courts and negotiation to address the issue of civil rights effectively. One of King's most important and most extended arguments begins with the distinction between just and unjust laws. He begins by stating one has a legal and a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. "I would agree with St. Augustine that an unjust law is no law at all" (King 420). A distinction is made that an unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal law and natural law and by contrast, any law that…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unjust Laws

    • 1053 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Firstly, one must define what an unjust law is. According to Martin Luther King, an unjust law is “any law that degrades human personality” (King 179). In other words, it is a law that is directed against a certain group of people or is inflicted on a minority. He continues on by stating that “an unjust law is a code that a numerical or power majority group compels a minority group to obey but does not make binding on itself” (King 179), meaning that any law that causes a person to suffer simply because they do not agree with this majority is an incorrect and unjust law.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics