Preview

Labour weakness was the reason for conservative dominance

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
562 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Labour weakness was the reason for conservative dominance
Labour weakness was the most important reason for Conservative dominance from 1951 to 1964. How far do you agree? Between 1951 and 1964, the Conservative's time in power, the Labour party were providing ineffectual opposition. One of the reasons for this was their internal disputes over issues such as unilateralism. However, there were also more important reasons for Conservative dominance, such as the economy and growing prosperity in Britain, the property owning democracy and the greater availability of credit, modern conveiniences and luxury items. Prosperity during this time was growing, and people were in general wealthier than they had been before. A reason for this could have been the manipulation of the economy by the Conservatives; their stop-and-go stagflation lowered and rose taxes in accordance to the election date in order to gain more votes. Though they had no real long-term economic plan and their wily manipulation was often criticised, it did help them to gain votes. The wages also rose during this time meaning people were able to more freely afford luxury items and other things such as mortgages, which links to the property owning democracy.

Macmillan's "never had it so good" speech rang true for many people, who used it as a way to realise that they indeed hadn't been so well-off before, and would be persuaded by that to continue voting for the Conservatives. helping them to dominate elections. Another factor which links to the lifestyle improvements was the greater availability of credit, which led to more people being able to afford mod cons and luxury items. There was a consumer boom during this time, when more people than ever before were able to buy items they previously couldn't afford thanks to the availability of credit; meaning they could pay for an item over a long period of time in small sums. People had not experienced this before and would have seen it as something that was much better than what they had during the Labour
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Explain How Successful Was The Liberal Government In Dealing With The Constitutional Crisis 1909-11
    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Explain How Successful Was The Liberal Government In Dealing With The Constitutional Crisis 1909-11

    The government could not fumction without money so the issue was put to the voters to decide. The Conservatives had to win a large number of seats in order to justify their rejection of the budget, however they did not and ithe election was therefore a defeat for the Conservatives. However, the Liberals no longer had an overall majority in the commons so they could only get their bills passed if they got the support of the Labour party and Irish Nationalists. The Irish Nationalists would only give their support in return for granting of Home Rule for Ireland, so the Liberal party had to include Home Rule in their policy. The Liberals were reliant on the Labour Party as Labour would only support them in return for favourable legislation for trade unions, assistance for working class candidates to become MPs. This allowed the Labour Party to develop links with uniona and allowed them to field more candidates at future elections, enabling them to challenge the Liberal Party; weakening the Liberals. After the election the budget was re-introduced into parliament and was passed by both…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain How Successful Were The Liberal Government In The Years 1906-1914
    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Explain How Successful Were The Liberal Government In The Years 1906-1914

    When the Liberals came into power in 1906 the Conservatives held a startling majority in the House of Lords due to their…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Is the Liberal Electoral Victory of 1906 Best Explained?
    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages

    How Is the Liberal Electoral Victory of 1906 Best Explained?

    The liberal’s victory in the 1906 was a very significant one due to how they won it with such an overwhelming majority; it was the biggest electoral victory since 1832. In the 1890’s the liberals were suffering from a crisis identity and they were lacking in money and morale. In the 1906 election the liberals won 49.4% of the vote and that amounted to 399 seats which was such a large margin compared to in 1900 where 45% of the vote was only 183 seats. There are four main reasons arguably why the Liberals won the1906 election and these are through Conservative faults such as the massacre in the Boer war. The education act in 1902 and Chamberlain’s tariff reform campaign also lost the conservatives a lot of support, which meant people turned to liberals just due to disliking the conservatives. The most important reason was Arthur Balfour getting involved and not making the right decisions for the conservatives and losing a lot of the voters they had before. The liberals also used a very negative campaign in order to get voters to realise the flaws in the conservative’s ideals and make them vote for the liberals just through dislike of the other parties.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Effective Were the Social Reforms of 1906 Essay Example
    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages

    How Effective Were the Social Reforms of 1906 Essay Example

    The liberal party led by Henry Campbell Bannerman won a landslide victory over the conservatives in the 1960 general election. They won 377 seats giving then an enormous majority of 84 over all other parities combined. Bannerman retired in 1908 and his successor Herbert Asquith, who brought about an increasing shift towards reform, originating from the initiatives of Lloyd George the Board of Trade and Winston Churchill the Chancellor of the Exchequer. Both of these characters were very influential in the idea of New Liberalism. New Liberalism was completely committed to radical, social reforms. This is exactly what the government tried to enforce between the years 1906-1914 and the ‘lib-labs’ (radical liberals) passed several reforms to try and liberalise Britain from the previous conservative rule.…

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Do You Agree with the View That ‘the Conservatives Were Certain to Win’ the 1979 General Election?
    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Do You Agree with the View That ‘the Conservatives Were Certain to Win’ the 1979 General Election?

    Many believed that Thatcher offered an alternative to the Labour government, a change, so after Callaghan’s government was destroyed by economic crises, rising unemployment, hostile trade unions and political misjudgements the Conservatives had a landslide victory with 43.9% of the vote. Before the Conservative rise to power with Thatcher, the Labour party had experience many troubles during their time in government, perhaps this is why the Conservatives won the General election. However was this win purely down to the conservatives and their policies or was it down to the failure of the Labour party.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain why the Tories won the General Election in 1959?
    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Explain why the Tories won the General Election in 1959?

    Possibly the most important reason for the Tory victory was the growing economic prosperity. This ideology was one of the Tories key focuses since they came back into power in the post war elections of 1951 and Macmillan did a sterling job in continuing the great work by creating what was known as the “age of affluence” allowing Britain to shine through as one of the World’s major economic powers. Bolstered by an improvement of world trade in the later 1950s, which enabled Britain to import about 29% more goods than it had in 1951 for the name number of exports proved that Britain was truly changing for the good. This massive economic growth also had a positive effect on the citizens who saw their average weekly wage double since 1951. The increase in real wages saw an augmented national purchase of goods such as TVs, motorbikes and cars. This sudden and vast economic recovery was harmful to Labour’s electoral campaign. With the working classes able to afford considerably more under Conservative rule due to the mass economic prosperity left Labour without a message or a receptive audience as the former traditional Labour voters were now middle-class conservatives. I think the age of the economic prosperity proving “life was better” with the conservatives was the most paramount factor that contributed to their victory.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain The Term Class Dealignment Used In The Extract.
    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Explain The Term Class Dealignment Used In The Extract.

    One reason for this could be because the 1980s introduced a new form of voters – known as “working class Tories”. The Conservative party gave the middle class the opportunity to purchase houses previously owned by the council. This allowed for them to own property – something that was only previously achievable by the upper classes. By doing this, Thatcher increased the working class support for the Conservative party which shows class dealignment. The 1974 general election showed C2 and DE classes voting for the conservative party at 26% and 22% of the electorate. However in 1979, when Thatcher gave these classes the opportunity to purchases houses, they increased to 41% and…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    To What Extent Was The Conservative Government In The Years 1951-1964
    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages

    To What Extent Was The Conservative Government In The Years 1951-1964

    During 1951-1954 Britain saw an improvement in the economy of the country. The global economy was booming as countries rebuilt after the war. High levels of demand from other countries and at home meant that by 1955 the unemployment rate was 1%, the lowest it had been since the end of the war. Wages rose by 30% and this all led to economic growth which was illustrated by the fact that home and car ownership, as well as demand for consumer goods increased dramatically…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    How Successful Was the Conservative Party Between 1918 and 1929
    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages

    How Successful Was the Conservative Party Between 1918 and 1929

    As a party the Conservatives can be seen to have achieved considerable success between the years 1918-28. Before the war the party had lost 3 consecutive elections, whereas during the period 1918-28 they were in power for all but 10 months of those 10 years (First Labour Government January- October 1924). It can then be seen through their domination of power that they were very successful. However during the first 4 of those years, whilst in power, they shared it with the Liberal Party, as their chances of winning as an individual party were near non-existent and so this limits the extent of their success. Their failings can also be seen through Stanley Baldwin, whose misjudged decision to hold a general election led the party to disaster in 1924 and lost them their position in government. I will argue that the Conservatives were very successful during those years, and that whilst such success was lessened by these two factors, the period 1918-28 was a largely prosperous time for the party.…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Explain Why Did The Republicans Win The 1906 Election
    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Explain Why Did The Republicans Win The 1906 Election

    In the1870s, the Conservative Party won three out of four elections and formed the government for 17 years out of a total of 20 years. It reflected the Conservative Party was the most powerful party in England at that time; they even had an overpowering majority of seats in the House of Lords. They had support from everywhere. However, the situation changed dramatically when the Liberal party won the general election in 1906 with an overwhelming majority of 400 seats as against 157 seats for the Conservatives party. This event was marked as the well-known ‘Liberal landslide’. There are several reasons why the Conservative lost such a large amount of seats; national efficiency, the imposition of Education Act and Licensing Act, tariff campaign and Neglect of social reform.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Lloyd George Fall From Power
    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages

    How Did Lloyd George Fall From Power

    Due to this Lloyd George had to concede to the conservatives at times as he did when they demanded that cuts be made and that Lloyd George agree to the Geddes axe. This was a mistake as it led to him earning a reputation of not fulfilling promises of reconstruction and led to a decline in popularity. The conservatives only needed Lloyd George as long as he was popular with the people and therefore an asset to them, his gradual decline in popularity led to the conservatives questioning his worth. His policies also went against what they stood for the most part and even though they remained loyal to the coalition due to Bonar Law, cracks appeared when Austen Chamberlain replaced him as leader of conservatives. However, it can argued that the conservatives were being pragmatic in letting Lloyd George introduce some social reform, especially since working class had received the vote. This did not deter backbenchers and die hards who grew in number and in criticism of Lloyd George’s policies, which culminated in the formation of the anti-waste league who won two by-elections, evidence that they held influence. As Lloyd George’s unpopularity grew so did the conservative attitude change towards him except in the senior members, which also led to the fear that a split may emerge over loyalty to the coalition.…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Did Labour Win The 1964 Election?
    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Why Did Labour Win The 1964 Election?

    Indeed, a major reason for Labour’s victory was because Harold Wilson advocated a campaign for economic modernisation of Britain so the nation did not fall behind the excelling economies of European rivals such as West Germany. Economists raise the significant point that economic modernisation looks at the internal dynamics of a nation while referring to social and cultural structures and the adaptation of new technologies. The Conservatives failed in every social and economic aspect of this theory, as shown in 1963, as unemployment reached approximately 800,000 making a mockery of Macmillan’s, ‘never had it so good speech.’ The inability of the Conservative Party to economically modernise Britain led not only to their downfall in the 1964 election, but also to the collapse of Britain’s economy during this era. Economists point out that as a result of Conservative mismanagement of the economic sectors, Britain faced financial hardships, including a huge balance of payments deficit, which undeniably caused higher levels of inflation, causing the cost of living for ordinary British people to rise. Moreover, the economic boom of the late 1950s and the, ‘Age of Affluence,’ had reached its end, with great saturation in the markets for consumer goods. Inevitably, poor…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Success Of The Liberal Social Reforms

    • 1369 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Success Of The Liberal Social Reforms

    After two unsuccessful electoral campaigns in the late 19th century and early 20th century, numerous splits in the party after William Gladstone's retirement, and the growing awareness of the issue of poverty within the UK, key figures within the Liberal party realised a change in the direction of Liberalism was required. They pushed for 'New Liberalism', a more modern form of Liberalism that stressed numerous key fundamental values, one of which was that intervention by the state was key in establishing a minimum quality of life for people within the country. Thus from their electoral triumph in 1906, and especially from 1908 onwards, the Liberal government passed a series of social and welfare reforms in an attempt to raise the quality of living standards within the UK. The Liberals based these reforms on three main groups within society, the elderly, the young, and the unemployed. This essay will explore several of the reforms the Liberal government introduced including the National Insurance act, the old age pensions act, a selection of educational acts, as well as acts regarding employment issues; assessing the aims of the acts and arguing how successful they actually proved to be in reducing the issue of poverty in the UK.…

    • 1369 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Herbert Hoover's Economic Boom
    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Herbert Hoover's Economic Boom

    The economic boom (the period of economic prosperity typically placed (1921-1929) was caused by an expansion in industry, which led to more jobs and an increase in disposable income. Many changes took place in the 1920's. Growth of mass production in industry, technological advances, and the increasing efficiency of labour boasted a gain in industrial production by over 60%. Because of this prosperous economy, the wealth of a typical family skyrocketed and led to the consumption of more consumer products. As a result of an improvement in three…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Suez Crisis
    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Suez Crisis

    Source 5 & 6 both support the view that the Conservatives took no damage during the crisis. Lee states, ‘There was no internal split in the Conservative party’. Kilmuir agrees with this, and goes onto talk about, ‘Our most lost party workers, although dismayed by our handling of the situation were consumed with the hatred of the Labour party.’ Which means even though they were going through a tough situation the Conservatives kept a strong front and were all in it together against Labour; even the media gave publicity in which spread the disgust to the public about the Labour party. Overall it shows Labour actually had it worse off; they weren’t popular with the public at the time, this later shows at the 1959 general election as Macmillan takes a victory for the Conservatives. On the other hand, Kilmuir was a member of the Conservatives at the time and he might have wanted to give the public the idea that the situation wasn’t as bad as it seemed as his party just caused a major international tensions with our allies. Although he does admit that, ‘Even the most hostile critics of the Conservative party’ had their doubtful moments in the party giving the idea that the party had nothing to hide and that its members knew there would be some slight internal tensions.…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics