Preview

Labor Theory

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
716 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Labor Theory
Casey Duke
Econ 305: Marxian Economics
Response Paper 2
Due: March 9th, 2013

Labor Theory of Value

Value is a term in which can be looked at and defined in multiple ways. However, the views of Marxian take both the term commodity, labor, and value and combine it into his Labor Theory of Value. With these terms and actions between laborers created surplus also relates to capitalism, and the origin of surplus in general. Sweezy defines a commodity as “something produced for exchange rather than use for producer”(Sweezy, 23). In Marx’s view regarding the qualitative-value problem, “every commodity has a two-fold aspect, that of use value and exchange value” (Sweezy, 26). Both these aspects focus on labor as a substance of value, including the use of the actually value and the commodity that this value actually produces. For example, the labor time used to create a coat involves stitching, weaving and putting the coat together is completely different than the value of the actual value of the coat produced. In words of Marx, “value is created by the expenditure of abstract, simple, socially necessary labor time” (LTV3, slide 5). The labor hours used to create the commodity is the use of labor value, while the actual coat is the commodity value. Without the use of labor value, there can be no commodity created. There are two crucial ways in which Marx views the Labor Theory of Value compared to those of other classical economists. First, the Labor Theory of Value operates on an aggregate level, and not at a level of individual commodities. This leads into the second way in which Marx views the theory, meaning that the value is created by the aggregation of the expenditure of abstract, simple, and socially necessary labor time. Therefore, Marx views value not as an ethical category, but an economic category instead, meaning that the overall view of value is expressed in terms of money. Just like value, money can also be viewed in terms as both a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In aversion to the issues of capitalism concerning wage labor and abuse of the laborer by the employer, Karl Marx and Frederick Engles saw the ills of society in the convention of private property. In his own words, Marx said that communism could be summed up in one sentence, “abolition of private property” (The Communist Manifesto, 23). Marx saw private property in the industrial age as the “antagonism of capital and wage labor,” (The Communist Manifesto, 23). The positive results of industry only allowed the bourgeois to obtain more capital and hire more labor. Capital, therefore, is for the bourgeois a means to accumulate labor for the individual.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx’s philosophy has been the subject of so much judgement and Scrutiny on if his beliefs will truly save the working man. The bourgeois interlocutor believe Marx’s belief would be more detrimental to the people as a whole. They believe that by wishing to abolish private property, communism will become a danger to freedom and eventual end up destroying the very base of all personal freedom, activity, and independence. Marx responds to these comments by stating that wage labor does not create any property when considering the laborers affairs. It only creates capital, a property which works only to increase the social injustice of the worker. This property called capital, is based on class antagonism. Having linked private property…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He uses information that has obviously been aware to many. When Marx disagrees with the private ownership of property, such technique is fairly visible. He believes that “Property, in its present form, is based on the antagonism of capital and wage labour.” For the Bourgeois society, “the right of personally acquiring property as the fruit of a man’s own labour, which property is alleged to be the groundwork of all personal freedom, activity and independence.” However, Marx claims that in this Bourgeois society, the workers do not work the sake of themselves but for the sake of the bourgeois and that “All that we want to do away with is the miserable character of this appropriation, under which the labourer lives merely to increase capital, and is allowed to live only in so far as the interest of the ruling class requires it.” According to Marx, it is logic that a labour should work for the purpose of working. Thus, he believes that labours working for the Bourgeois lost their sole purpose of existence-work. He claims that in the Bourgeois society, the Proletarians are used to increase capital and the Bourgeois property only, and become useless after they have done their job. In the Communist society, “accumulated labour is but a means to widen, to enrich, to promote the existence of the labourer.” Through the use of reasoning concepts that were obvious to the readers even before it was ever reasoned in this document, Marx persuades the audience that the function of the Bourgeoisie society is…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Marx Alienation

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Marx believed in objectification when it came to labor, or essentially the outside/visible things we create are the workings of our internal thoughts—in my job, this is seen when I program accounts for our call takers as I make the visible (the account the agent works from) by thinking internally what the way to get the best functionality of the account would be. Marx though had some other theories about labor such as how work is a material thing, i.e. we farm for the food, we dig for the oil, etc. Marx believed that labor transforms us in terms of what we need, our level of self-consciousness, and so on. Marx though thought of work as the human need to work due to their needs—this is relatable as I work because I need to money, I need the money because I have bills and because I am in college. There is though an interesting topic that pretty much every job has that Marx thought of—alienation.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. What are Marx’s views about the value of work in the society he describes? What is his attitude toward…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx is the first to state that capitalism is based on the accumulation and hyper-consumption of commodities. As such, commodities are meaningful both because of their monetary/exchange value and because they reflect the social relations of production that went into making them. In The Fetishism of the Commodity, Marx says that the inherent problem with the capitalist structure is that society tends to focus only on the monetary and exchange value of the commodity. Marx uses the word “fetish” to describe commodities and show how they cause society to fixate on their monetary and exchange values, while ignoring the exploitative nature of the market that produced them. To illustrate his point, Marx uses the example of wood used by a worker to create a table. “The form of wood, for instance, is altered, by making a table out of it. Yet, for all that, the table continues to be that common, every-day thing, wood” (1). While a commodity, in this case a table, is only valuable because of the labor used to make it, it is difficult to place a specific monetary value on labor quality, so capitalist society treats commodities as if they has intrinsic value. The value of the labor is…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx believed the factory system had resulted in a “cash economy”. Owning the means of production, the bourgeoisie kept wages low in order to get cheap supplies, improve the technology of their factories and increase their markets. According to Marx, dependency on low wages had reduced factory workers to “wage slaves,” deprived them of the satisfaction that should be found from working and made it more difficult for the lower class to provide for their basic needs. He wrote, “The work of the proletarians has lost all individual character…and all charm for the workman. He becomes an appendage of the machine.” (Paragraph 22)…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    because he is not the recipient of the product he creates. As a result labor is…

    • 1845 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marx believed that the poor were working their fingers to the bone to create value for society, while the rich simply siphoned off a portion of that value, which had been created by the poor. The rich do this without putting any effort into creating this value or their own value. In order for society’s productivity to be maximized, rich people’s syphoning off of a share of production must be done away with. Instead, the means of production (factories, stores, natural resources, etc.)—which rich people owned and used in order to siphon off poor people’s productivity—ought to be owned by the people themselves as a collective group. This prevents the rich from using their ownership position to syphon off a portion of society’s productione. Now, the people would continue to do all the producing, but the results of production would benefit only the people. In other words, each member of society must do what he or she can to produce the good and services society…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Furthermore, Marx analyzes the dialectic of private property which political economy regards as homogeneous. There are generally two kinds of property according to Marx, one that involves the labour of producers themselves to render it alienable, meaning it can be sold or exchanged, and the other which is maintained by exploiting the labour of others (Marx, 1990, p.930). The two forms of private property are the antithesis of one another and when one converts to the other, consumers who were once self-sufficient become dependent on wage labour. This relates to Marx’s notion of primitive accumulation since the transition to capitalism required the commodification of land. As individuals were expropriated from their land, they were required to…

    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marx commences his essay by maintaining that workers' miseries are directly proportional to their level of production; the more value workers attribute to their product, by virtue of their labor, the more miserable they become. Workers themselves are a commodity and the greater the value of their production, the cheaper a commodity they become. "The increase in the value of the world of things is directly proportional to the decrease in value of the human world." The end result of labor is its objectification into a thing, and the value of labor lies only in its objectification.…

    • 586 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Economic theories simplify the relations among key economic concepts and enable us to understand different economic concepts. Throughout history, different economists in different time periods have formed diverse thoughts on how markets work by building and improving on the work of those who came before them. Therefore in order to gain a wider understanding of a particular economic term, it is helpful for us to investigate more than one economic theory. This essay will explore classical and Marxist and compare their portrayal of the concept of profit and where is it from. While classical economists believe profit has a large role to play in land and rent, Marxist economists put more emphasis on surplus value gained through the exploitation of workers’ labour.…

    • 2081 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socialist sceptics such as Edward F. Adams, have accused Marx of creating theories such as that of surplus value purely to reinforce his argument (and the general popular feeling of his time) that socialism is scientifically the better political philosophy:…

    • 2242 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Factors effecting pay

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Karl Marx wrote that the value of goods and services is determined by the amount of labour that goes into them. Therefore the content of labour determines the price of labour.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics