Preview

Labor Relation

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
434 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Labor Relation
Case 17–CB–006651
American Postal Workers Union, Local 886
&
Sheryl Bishop

The case chosen is between American Postal Workers Union, Local 886 and Sheryl Bishop. The alleged violation is Section 8(b) (2), Causing Employer to Discriminate/Retaliate, 8 (b) (1) (A) Duty of Fair Representation, including Super seniority, denial of access, 8(b) (1)(A) Coercion, including Statements and Violence.

Section 8(b) (1) (A)—Restraint and Coercion of Employees. Section 8(b) (1) (A) forbids a labor organization or its agents “to restrain or coerce employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed in section 7”. The section also provides that it is not intended to “impair the rights of a labor organization to prescribe its own rules” concerning membership in the labor organization.
Section 8(b) (2)—Causing or Attempting to Cause Discrimination. Section 8(b) (2) makes it an unfair labor practice for a labor organization to cause an employer to discriminate against an employee in violation of Section 8(a) (3). As discussed earlier, Section 8(a) (3) prohibits an employer from discriminating against an employee in regards to wages, hours, and other conditions of employment for the purpose of encouraging or discouraging membership in a labor organization. It does allow, however, the making of union-security agreements under certain specified conditions.

The case
The complaint alleges that the Respondent Union violated Section 8 (b) (1) (a) of the Act by excluding Bishop from the monetary settlement of the grievances. The reason was because she was not a member of the Union and informing employees that the Union would not file grievances on behalf of employees who were not members of the Union and violated Section 8 (b) (2) of the Act by requesting that the Postal Service exclude Bishop from the grievance settlements.

Findings and Ruling:
The NLRB found that the Union did not unlawfully exclude Bishop from the class action grievances. Sheryl Bishop



References: http://www.branch38nalc.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/NLRB_BASIC_GUIDE.pdf http://www.nlrb.gov/case/17-CB-006651

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    vs NLRB stemmed from the formation of an employee based committee inside a small company of 200 employees. The reason for the creation of the employee based committee was due to financial problems they were experiencing in the late 1980s that caused them to decide on the elimination of the employee attendance bonus policy and the wage increase for the coming year. This policy change did not sit well with the employees who responded with a petition objecting to the change in company policy. After the president met with his supervisor staff to discuss the concerns and complaints of the employees, he realized that he would need employee participation in order to resolve or come to a mutual agreement regarding the issues at hand. In response, Electromation’s management team created five action committees: Absenteeism/infractions, No-smoking policy, Communication network, Pay progression for premium positions, and the Attendance bonus program. The committees were comprised of a selected number of employees that were chosen out of a group of volunteers. Electromation’s management team also delegated the number of employees in each committee and only allowed each chosen employee to be a part of only one of the five committees. According to the source these committees met on a weekly basis. The basis of each of the committees was for the members to collaborate together various ideas from their fellow coworkers that could be incorporated…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 1990, some employees at Hudson's Department Store at the Westland Mall in Westland, Michigan, began an effort to organize and bring in the UAW. On May 11, 1990, an authorized ballot of eligible workers took place; 274 votes were cast for the union and 179 against. Hudson immediately filed timely objections with the NLRB, contending that the outcome of the election was tainted by a letter sent to all employees on May 8, 1990, three days before the election. The NLRB overruled Hudson's objections and certified the UAW as the exclusive representative of the bargaining unit. Hudson refused to negotiate with the UAW. The UAW subsequently alleged Hudson’s Department Store with violating unfair labor practice charge Section 8(a) (5) and (1) of the NLRA. Hudson then moved to reopen the record on allegations of newly discovered evidence that forged authorization cards were used, prior to the election, to generate additional support for the union. Hudson petitioned to Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Ladwig for review after the Board's refusal to reopen the record. At this hearing, Hudson attempted to establish its forged cards allegations primarily through the testimony of John Madgwick, a former UAW supporter. At the conclusion of the hearing, ALJ Ladwig reaffirmed the NLRB's order to bargain.…

    • 2513 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bob Godzik's Report

    • 105 Words
    • 1 Page

    The sorting mail issued this isn’t a union job and not constituted in the agreement nevertheless, Julie Godzik shouldn’t me barking orders at me with her husband commenting how easy the mail run is. I have no problem with anyone using my bathrooms, however I do have a problem when Bob Godzik leave my bathrooms and the toilets our clogged. Right after the meeting with Carl Rossman about treating people with respect Bob was in the Bob Cat Area Gossiping. In July 2015 Harry and I were stripping and waxing nurses station Curt was servicing refrigerator when we exited he was outside takes notes.…

    • 105 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This Court should grant the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment because this Court should apply the law of East Kansas. This case involves a conflict of law issue because West Kansas’s law provides that worker’s compensation is the exclusive remedy for employees, who are victims of intentional torts, while East Kansas says that worker’s compensation is not the exclusive remedy. Under the governmental interest approach to conflicts of law, this Court should resolve this conflict in favor of East Kansas because it has an interest in applying its law, while West Kansas does not.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lmr Vs Nlbb

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages

    If the employees do not have representation, the will lose every battle with the company and they will be afraid to rule against them. If the employers are using a scare tactic to pursue the employees by threatening their benefits, but they should be offering them no matter what happens with the election. I believe that the NLRB should consider the Totality of conduct because the employer will be investigated for the violation and both accusation will be taken into consideration. The employees state their argument that because of section 7, they are allow to form a union to protect their rights. While the company is stating that they are giving all the bets benefits. Since the employer unlawfully threatened the employees, questioned the employees votes, threatened to cut down their wages and benefits, and threatened the loss of job this goes to show that the employer was wrong to pursue the employees votes. They should be fined and the NLRB should rule for the employees because they should be allowed to create a union for their welfare and have a union to represent them when they are in a…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wood Idrl320 Assignment2

    • 1041 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In this case, employees from Store 58 were notified of a union meeting to discuss joining a union and than had the option to sign an application for membership if they chose to do so. The employees have the respective right to organize and seek certification by the various ULP provisions by the Labour Relations Act. When the employees have participated in a trade union discussion, they would than have a right to sign an agreement to join the union, keeping in mind that the employees are not forced to sign any agreement. The unions obligation in this case, is to file for direct certification and to organize a campaign for the employees. If the board approves the certification, the union would than have the right to bargain with the employer on behalf of the employees within the bargaining unit and to enter into a collective agreement setting out the terms and conditions of the employment. The union also has the duty and responsibility to represent those employees that are in the bargaining unit in the manner which isn’t arbitrary, discriminating, or in bad faith whether or not employees have joined the union. The employers in this case, have the obligation and the right to mange their workplace as needed, however, it is their role to run the business…

    • 1041 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 39 Questions

    • 608 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This case involves itself within The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). The NLRA allows employees the right to form a union, to bargain collectively through a representative chosen on their own, and etc. Hence, employers have their rights but also obligations under the NLRA. The NLRA does not allow employers to discriminate or take part in any unfair…

    • 608 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The company is not found in violation of sections 8(a)(5) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act. They gave the union multiple proposals and informed the union that due to competitive wages they were implementing the wage increase. This is also to reduce the chance of employees fleeing. The union never responded with any counterproposals. In contrast to this ruling, the case of, Winn Dixie Stores Inc v. National Labor Relations Board, 1978, The ALJ found them in violation of section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act because it amounted to a unilateral increase in wages without giving notice to the union and without giving the union a meaningful opportunity to make…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The union’s position is the company violated Article 12 section 9 by not recalling Mr. Ronald Petrie back to work. The union points out how much overtime was required for the department previous years when it had five employees working in the department. The union also points out how much department transfer the company used as well. Since the glass department is requiring so much overtime and departmental transfer it is obvious a position should be opened in the department. The union feels the position should be opened and Mr. Ronald Petrie should return back to his job. The union points out how the company previously recalled to recognize opening for very short intervals. The overtime has been going on for over six weeks and the opening should be recalled. Mr. Ronald Petrie should also be made whole for all monies lost in the June 11 thru early October period.…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Labour Relation

    • 3801 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Phil Stone has been a union organizer for 15 years. He recently targeted a firm in the garment industry. Up to this point he has had informal discussions with a few of the company’s four hundred employees so that he can get a better feel for the chances of succeeding in the organizing drive. Phil is aware that he does not face a ‘slam dunk’ in this situation and his prediction is that the certification vote could be very close. He is aware that launching a full organizing campaign is an expensive proposition for the union, in time as well as resources, and his personal reputation as a successful organizer is at stake.…

    • 3801 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Commonwealth vs. Hunt

    • 2089 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Taylor, Benjamin, and Witney, Fred. U.S. Labor Relations Law. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1992.…

    • 2089 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    B. United Steelworkers of America vs. Weber (1979) Weber worked for kaiser aluminum who was under united steelworkers of merica-set up special training program for minorities-weber wanted to get in but couldn't filed using 1964 Civil Rights Act title 7-ruled in favor of court because making up for past…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Study 2 1 Assignment

    • 595 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2.) Fortin’s supervisor had no knowledge of her union activity but laid her off on the basis of her poor performance evaluation. Give reasons why a court should uphold or override the supervisor’s decision.…

    • 595 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “A ULP is an action, which violates the rights of a party covered by the federal labor law…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (a) It shall be an unlawfulemploymentpractice for an employer(1) to fail or refuse to hire or to dischargeany individual,or otherwiseto discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation,terms, conditions, or…

    • 9192 Words
    • 37 Pages
    Good Essays