Preview

Knowledge Is Power

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
6082 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Knowledge Is Power
A Critical Analysis of

“Knowledge is Power”

1. Introduction

The claim of “Knowledge is power”, made by Francis Bacon, has been universally well known. Originally, it was proposed to stress the importance of knowledge in science and an academic spirit because human were experiencing a major scientific revolution at that time and information technology is not as developed as now to spread knowledge. Now it has been recognised by a much wider range of fields. An interesting question is what the implication of this claim is in business, especially in an era quite different from Bacon’s time and a world featured with globalisation and knowledge revolution (Alvesson and Karreman, 2001). The advanced technology today not only changes the way of conducting business and facilitates the communication inside and outside the company, but also become a rising industry itself. Possession of physical property and capital is no longer the major source of sustainable competitive advantage but replaced by efficient information flow and intellectual (Mundra, Gulati & Vashisth, 2011).

Realizing the importance of knowledge in business, massive investment has been dedicated to knowledge management, aiming to fully utilize the power of knowledge. From both academic field and practical business world, there is a general belief that the time of knowledge has come and knowledge is at the centre of business strategy making and operations (Davenport et al., 1998). Many academic researchers and business practitioners have done a lot of work investigating how to utilize knowledge for business success. But few of them really considered to what extent Bacon’s claim hold true for individual and organisation respectively at first hand and whether there is any limitation. To fill up this gap, this paper is dedicated to critically evaluate Bacon’s claim, “knowledge is power”, in business context and the impacts of knowledge when it is employed as source of power.

In order to



References: [1] Akhavan, P.Jafar, M., Fathian, M. (2005). ‘Exploring failure-factors of implementing knowledge management systems in organizations.’ Journal of Knowledge Management Practice. 6,1–9. [3] Barney, JB (1991). ‘ Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage’ Journal of Management, 17 (1): 99-120. [5] Davenport, T. & Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knoweldge. Cambridge, MA: Havard Business School Press. [6] Davenport, T, De Long, D, & Beers, M. (1998). 'Successful Knowledge Management Projects ', Sloan Management Review, 39, 2, pp. 43-57, Business Source Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 8 May 2012. [7] Deutsch, M. and Gerard, H.B. (1955). ‘A study of normative and informational influcences upon individual judgement’. Journal of abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-36 [8] Duguid P [9] Ear, M. & Scott, I. (1999). 'What is a chief knowledge officer? ', Sloan Management Review, 40, 2, pp. 29-38, Business Source Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 17 May 2012. [11] French, J, & Raven, B. (1959), 'The bases of social power ', Studies in social power. pp. 150-167 Oxford England: Univer. Michigan PsycINFO, EBSCOhost, viewed 17 May 2012. [12] Foss, N., Husted, K., and Michailova, S. (2010). “Governing knowledge sharing in organizations: Levels of analysis, governance mechanisms, and research directions.” Journal of Management Study, 47(3), 455–482. [13] Gioia, D. A., & Sims, H. P. (1983). Perceptions of managerial power as a consequence of managerial behavior and reputation. Journal of Management, 9, 7-26. [14] Henrikson, M. (2006), 'On leadership. Great leaders are made, not born. Tips for traveling the path to leadership: part 3 of a four-part series ', AWHONN Lifelines, 10, 4, pp. 335-338, CINAHL Plus, EBSCOhost, viewed 17 May 2012. [15] Hinkin, T, & Schriesheim, C. (1989), 'Development and application of new scales to measure the French and Raven (1959) bases of social power ', Journal Of Applied Psychology, 74, 4, pp. 561-567, PsycARTICLES, EBSCOhost, viewed 15 May 2012. [16] Hunt, S. D. and Nevin, J. (1974), "Power in a Channel of Distribution: Sources and Consequences," Journal of Marketing Research, 11 (May), 186-193. [17] J-C, S. (1996), 'Making Knowledge the Basis of a Dynamic Theory of the Firm ', Strategic Management Journal, 17, pp. 45-62, JSTOR Arts & Sciences IV, EBSCOhost, viewed 14 May 2012. [18] Javernick-Will, A. (2012), 'Motivating Knowledge Sharing in Engineering and Construction Organizations: Power of Social Motivations ', Journal Of Management In Engineering, 28, 2, pp. 193-202, Business Source Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 17 May 2012. [19] Kärreman, D. (2010), 'The Power of Knowledge: Learning from 'Learning by Knowledge-Intensive Firm ' ', Journal Of Management Studies, 47, 7, pp. 1405-1416, Business Source Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 15 May 2012. [20] Leavitt, P., Mowbray, B., Skogstad, E. & American Productivity & Quality. (2003), 'World Bank profile : best practices in knowledge management ', ECONIS, EBSCOhost, viewed 17 May 2012. [21] McAdam R, Mason B, McCrory J. (2007). ‘Exploring the dichotomies within the tacit knowledge literature: towards a process of tacit knowing in organizations’ . Journal of Knowledge Management., 11(2):43-59. [23] Nonaka, I. & Nishiguchi, T. (Eds.). (2001). Knowledge emergence: Social, technical, and evolutionary dimensions of knowledge creation. New York: Oxford University Press [24] Polanyi, M [25] Porter, M. (1980). Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: The Free Press. [26] Porter, M. (1996), 'What Is Strategy?’ Harvard Business Review, 74, 6, pp. 61-78, Business Source Premier, EBSCOhost, viewed 14 May 2012. [27] Quinlan, J.R. (1987). ‘Generating production rules from decision trees’. Proceedings of the Tenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. (pp. 304-307). Milan, Italy: Morgan Kanfmann. [28] Skyrme and Amidon (1997), reported in Knight, T and Howes, T, 2003, Knowledge Management: A Blueprint for Delivery. Butterworth Heinemann: Oxford p.13 [29] Starbuck, W [30] Song, J, Yoon, S, & Yoon, H. (2011), 'Identifying Organizational Knowledge Creation Enablers through Content Analysis: The Voice from the Industry ', Performance Improvement Quarterly, 24, 2, pp. 71-88, ERIC, EBSCOhost, viewed 2 May 2012. [31]Teuscher, U. (2009). 'Subjective age bias: A motivational and information processing approach '. International Journal Of Behavioral Development, 33, 1, pp. 22-31, Academic Search Complete, EBSCOhost, viewed 17 May 2012. [32] Wong, K, & Aspinwall, E. (2005), 'An empirical study of the important factors for knowledge-management adoption in the SME sector ', Journal Of Knowledge Management, 9, 3, pp. 64-82, PsycINFO, EBSCOhost, viewed 17 May 2012. [33] Yang L. (2009). ‘Knowledge, tacit knowledge and tacit knowledge sharing: brief summary of theoretical foundation’. Int Conf Manag and Service Sci. MASS ‘09:1-5.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    power and status. In J. P. Walsh, & A. P. Brief (Eds.), Academy of Management Annals,…

    • 4791 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Bollinger, A.S. and Smith, R.D. (2001), ‘‘Managing organizational knowledge as a strategic asset’’, Journal of Knowledge Management, 5 (1), pp. 8-18.…

    • 3515 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Social order is one of the most central aspects of sociology. Two main factors are necessary for the existence of social order: predictability of society and cooperative behaviour of individuals (Hechter and Horne, 2003). In this essay I will describe how ‘values and norms’ and ‘power and authority’ account for social order, drawing on the explanations offered in Theories of Social Order: A Reader (2003) by Michael Hechter and Christine Horne. The first explanation is based on people cooperating voluntarily and following informal rules, while the second focuses on the ability of one group to control and coerce another into obeying the rules. I will discuss limitations of both theories and suggest that neither provides an entirely convincing explanation of social order on its own.…

    • 1983 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    French, J.P.R. & Raven, B. (2000). The Bases of Social Power. Studies in Social Power, 28(11), 73-88.…

    • 1830 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    John Deere Complex Parts

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages

    and its Solutions/POINTS CLÉS DANS LA MISE EN OEUVRE DE LA GESTION DES CONNAISSANCES ET DE SES SOLUTIONS…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Strategy

    • 4072 Words
    • 17 Pages

    Duguid, P. (2005). The art of knowing: Social and tacit dimensions of knowledge and the limits of the community of practice. The Information Society, 21, 109–118.…

    • 4072 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leading Change Paper

    • 8294 Words
    • 34 Pages

    A manager needs to understand the interdependency of departments, internal partnerships, and the influence of power and politics to effectively manage across the organization. Effective managers use various political tactics to increase their power within the organization to coordinate and support the work of their peers and subordinates to meet company objectives. Managers regularly acquire and use power. Power-oriented behavior has an impact on managerial career progress, on job performance, on organizational effectiveness, and on the personal lives of employees (Obholzer, 1995). It involves the combined topics of power, influence, authority, and organizational politics. When running an organization, all these factors should be taken into consideration.…

    • 8294 Words
    • 34 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bibliography: 1. Hislop, D. (2009). Knowledge management in organizations: a critical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | The author points out that successful implementation of Knowledge management has determinants that are specific to different organizational contexts. However, some factors that have had a significant impact on making an organization’s Knowledge management system a success are: 1. A shared understanding of the concept of knowledge management 2. The identification of the value of the co-creation of the knowledge management strategies which make up the system 3. The positioning of knowledge management as a strategic focus area in the organization. 4. Appropriate management of information throughout all stages of the Knowledge life-cycle and the appropriate alignment of technology and information to ensure access to knowledge for all individuals involved. 5. Understanding the role of organizational culture in the working of the organization and its importance in making the knowledge management system a success.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Geoff, W., 2001. Knowledge Management:: The Benefits and Limitations of Computer Systems. European Management Journal, 19(6), pp.599–608.…

    • 2359 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Riege, Andreas. (2005). Three- dozen knowledge-sharing barriers managers must consider. JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT. VOL. 9, NO.: pp. 18-35, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.…

    • 2964 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Yang, C., Chen, L. (2007). Can organizational knowledge capabilities affect knowledge sharing behavior? Journal of information sciences, SAGE: 95-109…

    • 2405 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., Harman, H. H., & Dermen, D. (1976). Manual for the kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Evans, M. G. (1985). A Monte Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated regression analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36, 305−323. Farmer, S. M., & Aguinis, H. (2005). Accounting for subordinate perceptions of supervisory power: an identity-dependence model. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1069−1083. Fast, N. J., & Chen, S. (2009). Power, incompetence, and aggression. Psychological Science, 20, 1406−1413. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Fiske, A. P. (1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99, 689−723. Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: the impact of power on stereotyping. The American Psychologist, 48, 621−628. Forgas, J. P., & George, J. M. (2001). Affective influences on judgments and behavior in organizations: an information processing perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 3−34. French, J. P., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150−165). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research. Galinsky, A. D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Magee, J. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 453−466. Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Gruenfeld, D. H., Whitson, J., & Liljenquist, K. (2008). Power reduces the press of the situation: implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1450−1466.…

    • 13371 Words
    • 54 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Steven Lukes perspective on power suggests power as a three dimensional concept. Luke’s view covers many management levels and power groups that exercise their power in the three dimensions discussed. Due to the differences in each dimension and its wide application to different situations, I believe it to be the most suitable power theory while observing power phenomenon within the workplace.…

    • 1874 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Power

    • 2940 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Power. The use of authority to control a group of people. It is the actor’s ability to manipulate opinions, emotions, and behaviour of groups, even against their will (Hardy, 1995; Hardy & Clegg, 1996). It is seen everywhere in organisational forms, from managers, to team leaders. But perhaps one of the most obvious use of power through businesses is government legislations. The government uses positional power to control and possess relevant sources such as managers, in order to get groups to do as they want (French & Raven, 1959). An example of government power in the workplace is through gender mainstreaming. Traditionally, men ruled the business world. Big business was their business. Emphasis was put on hiring white, straight, male individuals for high leadership jobs. The New Zealand government tried to change this behaviour in the late 1900 's by making new legislations that encouraged equal rights within the work place. As a result many developmental organisations are undertaking gender mainstreaming. Interestingly however, analysis on gender mainstreaming shows that gender and development influenced company’s aren’t actually implementing gender and development approaches in practice. Has New Zealand organisations developed a resistance to this power change that the government has enforced on them?…

    • 2940 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays