Preview

King Phillip's War

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
432 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
King Phillip's War
During the King Phillip’s War both colonists and Indians suffered great tragedies with the loss of life and the destruction of land. After a year of conflict that could be classified as the “most devastating war in this country's history”,(Millet & Feis, 20012) the colonials were able to triumph. Success is due in part to insightful soldiers like Captain Benjamin Church who commanded ad hoc volunteer companies. That, in conjunction with the militia’s ability to incapacitate their enemies during the Great Swamp Fight, and the Indian allies assistance in battle lead to the colonist’s success
American colonials during the 17th century were unfamiliar with the insurgency warfare conducted by the American Indian tribes of that time. They were used to the fixed battles on the open plains of Europe. It wasn’t until Captain Samuel Moseley, Captain Benjamin Church and William Turner compiled a volunteer company comprised mostly of friendly Indians, convicted pirates and other non-traditional soldiers, understanding that this would provide the colonists with an advantage in assaults and campaigns. These soldiers, known as ad hoc volunteer companies, were the first to conduct guerilla type warfare against the Indians. Although known as ruthless, hit and run warfare tactics were not the only tactic used by American Militia in battle during that time.
During The Great Swamp Fight, a crucial battle fought between the colonial militia and the Narragansett tribe during December of 1675, the use of fire had devastating consequences to that tribe. Not only did hundreds of Indians lose their lives but their survival was jeopardized at the loss of the provisions needed to sustain them during the winter. These conditions had debilitating effects on the Narragansett tribe and their ability to support the Wampanoags tribe and their leader Metacomet.
King Phillip had a difficult time recovering from the loss of this powerful alliance. That in conjunction with Capt Benjamin

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Hollitz Chapter 1

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although often viewed as inferior, savage and helpless, many historians are starting to discover the intelligence and wisdom the Indians had and shared with the colonists that came to America so long ago. As the settlers slowly began to create a new world on the already inhabited North America, they were plagued with starvation due to a severe drought in the area. Due to the dry lands and the settlers expectations to “rely on Indians for food and tribute,” (Norton 17) they were disappointed to find that the Indians were not so keen to handing out food and help to the strangers that have just come onto their land and begun to settle in such a time of severe weather and starvation. As time goes on, both the Indians and the Englishmen realize they both have what the other needs; tools from the white men and crops, land and knowledge from the Indians. As a result, the chief of Tsenacomoco, Powhatan, and colonist, Captain John Smith on an ideally peaceful, mutualistic relationship to ensure the survival of both civilizations. This agreement will leave the groups in cahoots for 100 of years leading to some disastrous scenarios and betrayals.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the book King Philip’s War by Daniel R. Mandell, Mandell argues that King Philip’s War is the fundamental turning point in the relations between the Indians and Anglo Americans and the Sovereignty of the Indians. This ultimately led to the war known as King Philip’s War.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yamasee Critique

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The purpose of this article was to analyze the origins of the Yamasee War and to depict the reasoning for its occurrence by comparing various writers work. The researcher often mentions how little the war is recognized as one of the most important events in colonial history. In early 1712, Reverend LeJau made a remark that he felt “discomforted by “something cloudy in their looks”. This look apparently had a meaning stronger than it appeared. The Warriors from every tribe/ nation from the South had formed an alliance and were one of the strongest native coalitions to ever go against the British in North America. This strong force came extremely close to wiping out the European colonists. The war had created much controversy throughout South Carolina and was one of the strongest life threatening wars to the population. The dependence upon Native Americans became apparent with South Carolina’s “experimentation with Indian slavery”. The war caused an execution to “Indian slavery” and prompted African labor from 1715. The original efforts to discover the cause of the war focused mainly on the behavior of the English traders. “John R. Swanston, writing in the same decade, also felt that the “misconduct of some traders” had been the “immediate cause” of the war but went on to add that fears of enslavement may have prompted the Yamasees to action as well” This opinion has created an idea that this was the main cause of the war, but other writers and historians seem to feel otherwise. James Merrell, for example created a more logical discussion about the geography of South Carolina at the time as well as the misperceptions between the Yamasees and Europeans. Present studies bring forth the idea of the dependency theory. This idea changes the outlook of one of the possible causes of the war and can vouch for reasons why certain events occurred throughout the war. Some believe that dependency upon the Native Americans could have ignited the war. The cultural aspects of the…

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    George Washington

    • 4952 Words
    • 20 Pages

    In 1776, the colonialists of the thirteen colonies of Great Britain and it’s king rose up to protest against absolute rule. After the colonists rebelled and declared independence, a war erupted as King George III wished to crush the “rebellion” leading up to the War of Independence or most commonly referred to as the Revolutionary War. The War of the American Revolution was a time of patriotism, nationalism, and an era of combat and battle. A primary figure from this time period was the Commander-in-Chief of the Revolutionary Continental Army, George Washington. Washington’s leadership role in the American Revolution was extremely successful and without his military strategies, the continental army would not have been victorious.…

    • 4952 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Piecuch explains that while the British understood that the Southern Strategy depended on Indian support, many in Parliament were hesitant to use them, “we must not be tender of calling upon the Savages,” (39). These hesitations would be further complicated due to relations between the Indians and Spanish near Florida, “preserved a strong attachment to the Spanish” (28) and severe lack of communication between the two parties. Regardless of the hesitation, animosity, and sympathy towards Spain, Indians still contributed immensely to the war effort. One of their greatest contributions would be defending the Pensacola from Spanish invaders, halting their advancement and forcing the troops to build trenches, “being in the midst of woods surrounded by savages who hid in the forest and insulted us at all hours, this operation was indispensable” (264). Sporadic and abrasive at times, Pro-British Indian supporters also established themselves as a constant threat too large to be ignored by the revolutionist. Despite their importance to the cause, however, they too would also be treated with a multitude of disapproval and resentment by the…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the late 1500s, there were two great powers fighting for superiority. Both King Phillip II of Spain and Queen Elizabeth I of England were contending for the greatest empire in the world. At that, both of these rulers were drastically different in how they carried out policies. One of the biggest policies during the time was religion. During this time, the church was splitting with the protestant sect. of Christianity taking Europe by storm. Henry VIII formed the Church of England in an attempt to marry again, making the country protestant. This would cause a great sir in England as previously it was a catholic country and even a bigger stir when his daughter Mary tried to convert the country back to Catholicism. By the time Elizabeth took reign, she would make the country protestant but, very lenient towards Catholics. Phillip was drastically different when religion was concerned. His nickname was “The Most Catholic King” referring to his dedication to Catholicism. It would prove to be a great part in the reason why he would send his armada in 1588. Foreign policy was another difference between the two countries. England had a policy of not interfering with foreign affairs unless it was against their interests. This policy includes aiding the Spanish Netherlands in a failed attempt to stop the Spanish and also financially aiding pirates to raid Spanish ships. Spain was mostly about preserving Catholicism in Europe. Some examples are a failed attempt to help the Guise family route out the Protestants in France during the French civil war and even more notoriously was the disastrous 1588 Armada, losing two-thirds of his navy. This would definitely mark the end of the Spanish being the greatest empire in Europe. By the end of both King Phillip II of Spain and Elizabeth II of England, Europe would be greatly changed. Spain would no longer be the greatest super power of Europe and England would start its rise to power.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For years Britain had been known to have one of the mightiest military powers in the world. This sentiment was only furthered by their 1588 defeat of the Spanish Armada and again by their defeat of the French in 1763 (in the seven years’ war). In contrast, the colonies had small militias made up of mere citizens that were, for the most part, untrained in battle or military strategy. How could anyone expect the colonies, with their lowly militias, to ever hope to bring down such a force as the renowned British military?…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roanoke Theory

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Massacre. With an exhaustive history of strife between the American Indians and colonists, especially over food, when a time of drought hit from 1587 to 1589, a fatal fight could have materialized due to scarce resources. The “Croatoan”, a considerable Native American tribe of the region, could have been the tribe charged with the massacre of the colonists as “Croatoan” was the clue left by colonists (“Vanished into Thin Air”). Under harsh conditions such as a drought, tensions could rise and lead to conflict and quarrel between competing populations.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Phillip II, King of Macedonia was murdered in 336 BC when he attended the wedding between his daughter, Cleopatra and his brother in law, Alexander of Epirus. As he walked into the theatre where the wedding was to be held, he was fatally stabbed by a man named Pausanias, his head of guards. There were many theories behind the reason for Pausanias’ actions. Many said that it was pent up anger that drove Pausanias, while others suggested that Phillip’s wife, Olympias of Epirus and his son; Alexander had put him up to it. The Lyncestis brothers (a notable Macedonian family), Antipater (a powerful politician), Demosthenes (a prominent Greek statesmen and orator) and the Persian King Darius III were all said to be involved in the murder of Phillip.…

    • 1883 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    His heavy usage of secondary sources demonstrates his reliance on other author’s arguments and ideas rather than constructing his own opinion from primary sources. For example, Calloway references various secondary sources, including Richard Lytle’s the Soldiers of America’s First Army when writing, “the army was ineffective at anything other than local police action” (20). Moreover, Calloway provides information that is not relevant to his argument, such as detailing the land purchases made by different companies, the political structure of Native Americans, and his failure to compare it directly to the political structure of the U.S. Furthermore, despite the book focusing on acknowledging Indian victory, Calloway focuses excessively on the American perspective rather than the Indian perspective. For instance, there was only one chapter devoted to the Indians while the rest of the book focused on problems faced by Americans. Although he mentions Indians in the other chapters, the focal point are the…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Guerilla Warfare

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Guerrilla warfare has figured prominently in the history of North and South America, from the slave revolts against the Portuguese and Dutch in Brazil in the 17th century to the ranger raids behind Union lines led by the Confederate solider John Singleton Mosby during the American Civil War. In early 19th century…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Philip Ii

    • 3171 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Philip II, king of Spain and only son of the Holy Roman emperor Charles V, had everything in his favor to become the dominant power in Europe and probably the world at that time. Nonetheless, he did not succeed in doing so due to his poor leadership, incompetence, bad fortune and his inept financial understanding. As an ardent Catholic defender and due to his strong sense of duty and devotion to his empire, Philip focused on expanding the Spanish realm throughout Europe and promoting Catholic faith. Barbara Tuchman analyzing Philip's incompetence: "No experience of the failure of his policy could shake his belief in its essential excellence. That whatever he did was done for the service of God, that success or failure depended on the inscrutable will of the Almighty and not on himself, were his guiding convictions, which he transmitted to his successors." (The March of Folly) Furthermore, Philip II was not only incompetent due to his unshakable and often erroneous beliefs and interpretations of them. Despite having everything in his favor to become the dominant power in Europe and defy the traditional European balance of powers imposed since the dissolution of Charlemagne's empire, he did not achieve to rule his empire astutely and rise as the dominant nation in Europe . He received an annual income of 2 million ducats in form of gold and silver from the Spanish territory in the New World. He inherited a huge part of land in Europe and the Americas as well as several colonies in Africa and India from his father, Charles V. He possessed the largest fleet in the world and the best military formation. He had the power to dominate the world. Regardless of these advantages, he was not able to dominate Europe and become the most powerful absolute ruler. Philip acted "for the service of God," hence he believed that the Almighty would grant him the power to dominate the world if he promoted and defended the only true religion, Catholicism. Therefore, he believed that all…

    • 3171 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Philmas War Analysis

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the article, Philip Ranlet analyzes the possible causes that led to King Philip’s War to deconstruct the misleading interpretations often made by historians about the crucial event. Ranlet’s “Another Look at the Causes of King Philip’s War” contributes to the New Left historiographical discussion because the historians demand the inclusion of those features of our history that explains how we came to be a violent, racist, repressive society. The interpretation of some historians are often influenced by the time period the event is being analyzed. For example, nineteenteenth century historian, John Gorham Palfrey, referred to King Philip as “ ‘an unreasoning and cruel barbarian’ who had no cause to war against the Puritan settlers.”(Ranlet…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * England feels like there’s no choice but to go to war to stop Philip…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Philippine Revolution

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages

    * expulsion of the friars and the return to the Filipinos of the lands they appropriated for themselves…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays