Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

King Lear's Folly

Good Essays
1190 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
King Lear's Folly
In Shakespeare's King Lear, the actions of King Lear and of his daughters bring ruin and chaos to England. Social structures crumble, foreign invaders threaten the land, and, in a distinctly non-Hollywood ending, almost everyone dies tragically. The outlook is very bleak, as many of the problems are left unresolved at the end of the play: There is no one in line to assume sovereignty, and justice and virtue have not been restored to their proper places in the country's structure. All of these problems are catalogued by Edmund early in the play:

Unnaturalness between the child and the parent; death, dearth, dissolutions of ancient amities; divisions in state, menaces and malediction against king and nobles; needless diffidences, banishment of friends, dissipation of cohorts, nuptial breaches, and I know not what. (King Lear, I.ii.120-123)

Each of these comes to pass, in some way or another, during the course of the play. Later on, Lear's fool adds to the list of woes: priests who do not practice what they preach, brewers who water down their beer, nobles practicing common occupations, people burned for expressing their sexuality, and many others besides. (King Lear, III.ii.76-89) Unlike Edmund's list of problems, the fulfillment of these is not specifically detailed in the text of the play, but this second catalogue adds to the general feeling of the dissolution of society that runs throughout the drama.

All of these problems can be traced (directly or indirectly) to Lear's abdication of the throne. Although Lear had no thought for the problems it might cause, the abandonment of the royal throne by the king had struck at the very heart of the social order that the Englishmen in Shakespeare's time had envisioned. The king was the representative of God on earth in the political arena. Since the Reformation in England, the King had also been the successor of the Pope as the head of the Church of England and, hence, God's representative on earth in the spiritual arena, as well. For Lear to abandon the throne and to divide his kingdom was for him to mock the divine order and the great chain of being to which Elizabethans likened their society.

Lear's fatal flaw is lack of insight; Regan claims early in the play that "he hath ever but slenderly known himself." (King Lear, I.i.286-287) Sight and insight are major themes in the play; many of the tragic situations could have been avoided if the characters had better understood themselves, their situation, or each other. Cordelia fails to see the ritual nature of the favor her father asks of her; Lear fails to see that his daughter, in refusing to participate in the test, is attempting to deal with him as a person, outside of the ritual framework in which he operates; Regan and Goneril fail to see Edmund's trickery; Gloucester, like Oedipus, gains insight only when he is blinded. It is difficult to blame the characters for not better seeing each other, however, when Shakespeare gives us so little character development in the plot. This lack of character makes the play seem more like an allegory or a fable than one of Shakespeare's other tragedies, where the character development is so rich. (King Lear is poorly developed compared to, say, Richard III or Hamlet.)

If Lear had had more insight, he would have seen the way in which he threatened the stability of the social structure. When he forsakes the throne and divides his country, this stability is left without anything at the top to hold it together, and forces that had been kept in check are let run wild: the lustful ambition of Regan and Goneril, the violent ambition of the bastard Edmund, and even the violent abandon of the elements in the heavens. The good Earl of Kent is banished, Cordelia is stripped of her dowry and taken away to France, and Edgar, Gloucester's good son, is proclaimed an outlaw. Evil is loosed on the country and good is pushed away. The fool disappears because everyone in the kingdom becomes foolish; as with virtue, there is no room for wisdom in a country without a social order, and that requires a monarch.

All of these elements had been held in check by the office of the king, which was bigger than any man who might fill it. By retiring, Lear directly attacked the authority of the office, and weakened the authority on which the entire social order rested. His withdrawal from the political process created a country in which the good are afraid to live up to their potential and the evil run amok. As the bastard Edmund explains to a soldier upon ordering the death of Lear and Cordelia,

Know thou this, that men

Are as the time is. To be tender-minded

Does not become a sword. Thy great employment

Will not bear question. (King Lear, V.iii.31-34)

Lear's central flaw, lack of insight, is aided and abetted in the violence it does to the social system by pride and stubbornness. His fool constantly reminds him of this fact before disappearing after act III. Lear stubbornly attempts to hold on to what he has given away, as when his daughters try to persuade him to reduce the number of knights that he keeps in his retinue in II.iv; he proudly refuses to hear Kent's voice of reason after stripping Cordelia of her inheritance. Although the other characters have faults of their own, these faults are of lesser importance than the monarch's, as his office had held the faults of the other characters in check while he held the office.

It seems likely that King Lear was intended, at least in part, as a warning to the new English monarch, King James I, who assumed the throne in 1603, after the death of Elizabeth. (The play was written some time between 1603 and 1606, and was performed as the court's Christmas celebrations in 1606.) James was, in some ways, like Lear: He enjoyed hunting; ran a court frequently thought to be corrupt, especially because of his extensive grants of monopolies and his difficulties reconciling the various Protestant ways of thinking in the kingdom; and insisted on monarchical absolutist prerogatives. James also had plans for unifying England and Scotland, and the play's theme of the dangers of division of land may resonate with this. (Introduction 889)

In the end, however, the play is carried and made compelling by the larger-than-life drama which operates beyond any particular political situation in Shakespeare's contemporary world. The dramatic interaction of characters whose motivations are shrouded add a mythic quality to the actions of the play that only accentuates the wrong that Lear does to his society. In this context, the expulsion of the good Kent from England seems almost a reversal of the expulsion of Adam and Eve from paradise, for instance. The veiled characters make the play understandable and captivating to audiences of any era.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    King Lear, written by William Shakespeare, tells of the tragedies the old king experiences. Lear loses his kingdom, is betrayed by his daughters, loses his pride and dignity, and loses the one daughter who truly loves him. All of these events could have been easily avoided. The tragedies that King Lear experience are of his own devices. Every event listed above are consequences of Lear’s own views, decisions, and actions.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare reveals without the presence of authority, humanity succumbs to chaos. In the opening, King Lear’s authority is immediately established with the use of the imperatives, “attend”, “give, “tell” and “speak”. This affirms King Lear as a powerful figure of authority through his command of language. Upon his relinquishing of power to his daughters the ‘storm and tempest’ begins on stage. This acts as a physical manifestation of Lear’s inner turmoil, and the chaos in the natural order due to the loss of authority. The chaos is further represented on the heath when Lear’s language reminds us of hell, with imagery of, “sulphurous and thought executing fires”. This displays the violence, and break down in refined language, highlighting to us the chaos consuming Lear, and his world. Shakespeare, therefore confirms that without a presence of authority, chaos will descend upon the world.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Falstaff and King Lear

    • 1295 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Shakespeare's tragedy King Lear is a detailed description of the consequences of one man's decisions. This fictitious man is Lear, King of England, who's decisions greatly alter his life and the lives of those around him. As Lear bears the status of King he is, as one expects, a man of great power but sinfully he surrenders all of this power to his daughters as a reward for their demonstration of love towards him. (Cain) This untimely abdication of his throne results in a chain reaction of events that send him through a journey of hell. King Lear is a metaphorical description of one man's journey through hell in order to expiate his sin. As the play opens one can almost immediately see that Lear begins to make mistakes that will eventually result in his downfall. (Neher)…

    • 1295 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Lear's Dementia

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cited: Shakespeare, William, and Russell A. Fraser. The Tragedy of King Lear. New York: New American Library, 1986. Print.…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Act 1 of King Lear Shakespeare seems to foreshadow the key themes of the play which often have sorrowful consequences for many of the characters. For example when Lear decides that he will test his daughter’s flattery in exchange for their share of the kingdom, ‘Which of you shall we say doth love us most, that we our largest bounty may extend’ the contest seems to be an empty gesture as Gloucester and Kent had already discussed that both dukes could already expect an equal share of England ‘for qualities are so weighed that curiosity in neither can make choice of either’s moiety’. The kings’ empty words are soon mirrored by his children’s as Gonerill remarks that ‘Sir, i love you more that word…

    • 1520 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lesson 6

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages

    a) The opening Act of King Lear evidently portrays Lear’s downward movement as it coincides with Aristotle’s structure of Greek tragedy. The play begins with Lear, a hero of noble birth and ruler of Britain, in an ordered society soon to be disrupted by a fatal flaw that is the result of his excessive pride. His journey from the ordered to the disordered world becomes apparent after he hands his land over to his two elder daughters and banishes his youngest daughter Cordelia from the kingdom. The initial situation began when Lear asks Cordelia, “What can you say to draw / A third more opulent than your sisters?” (I i 87-88), in which she answers “Nothing, my lord” (I i 89). This demonstrates Lear’s arrogance and triggers the rash decision he makes that would greatly impact the tragic events that follow. At the end of the scene, his two elder daughters immediately work to conspire against him so that he would be left with no power at all. Goneril says to Regan that they “must do something, and i’ th’ heat” (I ii 311). This foreshadows Lear’s impending downward movement and begins the reversal of his fortunes as things go from bad to worse. Lear’s recognition of the truth and the existence of his tragic circumstance becomes slightly clear to him when he wonders whether he has lost his mind and cries out “O let me not be mad, not mad, sweet heaven!” (I v 46). Act I leaves off at this stage where Lear is about to suffer tremendously before further stages of recognition, retribution, and restitution occur later in the play.…

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Lear was written around 1603-06. A contextualised political reading interprets King Lear as a drama that gives expression to crucial political and social issues of its time: the hierarchy of the Jacobean state, King James' belief in his divine right to rule, and the political anxieties that characterised the end of Queen Elizabeth's reign: fears of civil war and division of the kingdom triggered by growth of conflicting fractions and a threatening underclass.…

    • 1536 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    King Lear is a tragedy written by William Shakespeare in the Jacobean period after King James I of England came to the throne. Tragedies, which centre around dysfunctional families or couples such as Euripides’ Medea, focus on human suffering and require a high status protagonist to make a tragic mistake due to a flaw in his character which makes him human. King Lear’s tragic character flaw is arrogance and in some ways gullibility as he believes his daughters, Regan and Goneril, when they flatter him to gain a share of the kingdom. The key element for tragedies is the protagonist has to die shortly after recognising his error. It is typical for the audience to cry, giving them a cathartic experience.…

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The primary purpose of Shakespeare’s “King Lear”is the tragedy and focus of the fall of a noble character due to a tragic flaw. Shakespeare’s main purpose was perhaps to emphasize on the idea that tragedies intend to show how our very own human nature can turn out to be our worst enemy. In “King Lear,” the reader gets to see how Lear suffers from his tragic flaw, which includes of arrogance and misjudgements. Because of his tragic flaw, King Lear makes bad decisions. When he announces his plan in dividing the kingdom between his three daughters he orders them to speak up and say which daughter loves him the most. He does this not thinking about the consequences; he expects Cordelia, his favorite daughter, to speak up instead Goneril and Regan…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Lear Betrayal

    • 1644 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The question that arises when two separate sets of father and child relationships go through acts of betrayal is; which is more sinister and heartless? There are many contributing factors and different aspects to consider when it comes to answering such a question such as who is involved, what specific acts were committed and other elements of that nature. In the play “King Lear” by Shakespeare, there are many striking similarities between the betrayal of Gloucester by Edmund and the betrayal of King Lear by Goneril and Regan, yet one in particular stands out as being much more sinister and heartless. Edmund’s betrayal of his father, Gloucester is more sinister compared to Goneril and Regan’s betrayal of their father, King Lear due to their degrees of ungratefulness, acts of deception and intentions.…

    • 1644 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Lear and Morality

    • 1688 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Throughout life humans are faced with many crises and obstacles. It is the way in which we react to these obstacles, however, that ultimately defines our personalities. This idea is found in works by William Shakespeare where characters are continually faced with conflicts and strife. In Shakespeare’s King Lear, characters react to conflict and chaos in a number of ways thereby revealing their personalities and solidifying the idea of a certain code of conduct to live by. Shakespeare’s code of conduct allows characters that are cautious as well as principled to achieve some sort of goal or revelation for the greater macrocosm. The characters that we would define as immoral act upon personal gain and are ultimately foiled, yet some of those that we would consider to be moral characters are met with untimely deaths. Despite a seeming injustice to the code of conduct caused by some protagonist’s deaths, there is still a justice to be found in the overall good of the kingdom as the concepts and actions of morality persevere.…

    • 1688 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Does King Lear Change

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although tormented by the fact that even when he was important and had value he held nothing, he was also confronted with the physical issues his selfishness had caused other people, like his Fool who followed him into the storm, and Kent his loyal servant who had been exiled, or even his entire kingdom whom he hadn’t taken care of properly. After this realization, Lear’s perspective of the word “nothing” changed. While Lear had to lose everything to really understand what it meant to have nothing, Kent and Cordelia demonstrated that the true value of their loyalty remained in their actions not their words. What makes this a tragedy aside from death and Lear’s hamartia, is the Kings’ inevitable full turn of the wheel. Once he realized where he had gone wrong, there was no way to stop what came next. However, in the end it did not mattered for Lear learned the true meaning of love and what it meant to have something. He might have had it all and lost it, but when Cordelia forgave him and saw her once again, he wished for nothing more, because he had realized her love did not belong to her tongue but her heart, one that despite his ignorance, forgave him, brought him peace and wisdom.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Gods Are Just- King Lear

    • 2521 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The malignant ferocity and human cruelty found in ‘King Lear’ has lead some contemporary critics such as Stephen Greenblatt to deem Shakespeare “a decisively secular dramatist”. The play is often viewed as the most tragic and disaster ridden of all of Shakespeare’s tragedies. The tragic events that prevail throughout the play create the impression that there can be no form of justice or providence. At the conclusion of the play Cordelia is hung and King Lear dies in a delusional state of mind. Samuel Johnson considered this ending to be a violation of poetic justice. Virtuous ‘good’ characters traditionally survive in such tragedies. Shakespeare created an apparently clear division between the good characters that the audience should empathise with, and those who are “evil”. The character of the king merges the ideas of good and evil in the play. Tragedy resonates throughout ‘King Lear’, affecting all of the characters; both the “evil” and the “good”. Edgar’s assertion that “ The gods are just, and of our pleasant vices make instruments to plague us” raises a principal question from a modern audience’s perspective of whether the cruel painfully pernicious treatment of King Lear, and in parallel of Gloucester, can be justified.…

    • 2521 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    nothing in king lear

    • 943 Words
    • 3 Pages

    King Lear is one of Shakespeare’s many tragedies, The Tragedy of King Lear begins with King Lear desiring to step down from the throne, he chooses to divide the kingdom up amongst his three daughters. In order for them to receive their inheritance they must first pass his test, they must tell him how much each one of them loves him. Goneril and Regan, Lear’s older daughters, give their father flattering answers. But when its his youngest daughters turn, she says Nothing. She cannot put it into words her love for her father. And thus a misunderstanding ensues and a furious Lear disowns her, she soon elopes with her lover. Eventually Lear goes insane, is captured by the English with his daughter Cordelia and is imprisoned. There are many sophisticated themes that prevail through out this play but one stands out, and that is the theme of nothing and the effect it has on the human psyche, and our perception of reality.…

    • 943 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tragedy is defined by a series of unfortunate events that occurs to someone who does not deserve them. When a protagonist makes mistakes, sometimes other characters take the repercussions. Set in a time of royalty and ranks, King Lear describes parallel events of the pursuit of power, recognition, and certain tragic choices. With parallelism, similar occurrences highlight the importance of certain themes. In the play, William Shakespeare juxtaposes Lear’s choices and aftermath those of Gloucester to illustrate how physical and figurative blindness can lead to tragic endings.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays