Preview

King Lear vs. the Stone Angel

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1904 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
King Lear vs. the Stone Angel
It has been said that, "Rivers and mountains may change; human nature, never."(worldofquotes.com) This is a quote that can be deconstructed when examining William Shakespeare's King Lear and Margaret Laurence's The Stone Angel. When reviewing the two books the main characters, King Lear and Hagar, are easily comparable. The first similarity becomes apparent when King Lear and Hagar are both developed as flawed characters. Secondly, because of their flaws the two characters become blind to reality. Thirdly, after being deceived by themselves and others as a result of their blindness, both characters seek refuge outside of their own homes. By leaving their homes the characters are able to gain perspective on themselves and their pasts. Finally, despite these similarities between King Lear and Hagar, a significant difference prevails after the characters experience their epiphanies and are awarded a chance to redeem themselves. When exploring King Lear and The Stone Angel it becomes clear that although both main characters engage in similar journeys to self discovery a critical difference between the two books exists in the character's ability to redeem themselves after their epiphany. It first became clear that Shakespeare's King Lear and Laurence's Hagar Shipley were similar main characters when their personalities were developed with flaws. King Lear was immediately revealed as an imperfect character when he was shown in his somewhat conflicting roles as a father and a king. After resolving to divide his kingdom amongst his three daughters Lear develops a way to decide how his power and land will be divided. Looking to his three children Lear probes, "Tell me, my daughters/ (Since now we will divest us both of rule,/ Interest of territory, cares of state),/ Which of you shall we say doth love us most?/ That we our largest bounty may extend/ Where nature doth with merit challenge."(I.i.49-54) It is at this point in the play that King Lear


Cited: Laurence, Margaret. The Stone Angel. McClelland & Stewart Ltd: Toronto, 1988. Shakespeare, William. King Lear. Harcourt Canada Ltd. World of Quotes. 19 Ma. 2005 http://www.worldofquotes.com/search.php
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    King Lear Character Analysis Essay
    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    King Lear Character Analysis Essay

    The primary purpose of Shakespeare’s “King Lear”is the tragedy and focus of the fall of a noble character due to a tragic flaw. Shakespeare’s main purpose was perhaps to emphasize on the idea that tragedies intend to show how our very own human nature can turn out to be our worst enemy. In “King Lear,” the reader gets to see how Lear suffers from his tragic flaw, which includes of arrogance and misjudgements. Because of his tragic flaw, King Lear makes bad decisions. When he announces his plan in dividing the kingdom between his three daughters he orders them to speak up and say which daughter loves him the most. He does this not thinking about the consequences; he expects Cordelia, his favorite daughter, to speak up instead Goneril and Regan…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    King Lear vs the Stone Angel Blindness
    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages

    King Lear vs the Stone Angel Blindness

    It was once said, "What you lose in blindness is the space around you, the place where you are, and without that you might not exist. You could be nowhere at all."(Kingslover) This is a quote that can relate the characters in The Stone Angel and King Lear. In the tragedy King Lear, written by William Shakespeare and in the novel The Stone Angel, written by Margaret Laurence, the term blindness has an entirely different meaning. It is not a physical flaw, but the inability of the characters to use their thoughts and emotions to see a person for whom they truly are. King Lear, Gloucester, and Hagar are prime examples of characters that suffered most by having this flaw. Nevertheless, from this blindness leads a feeling of loneliness and hopelessness, isolation. Once this isolation has overcome them, the characters finally gain the insight that has long flawed them and indulge in self-discovery. Although these characters share these traits, it is clear that a critical difference between the two books exists in the character's ability to redeem themselves after the epiphany. Blindness gives moral insight.…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ap Literature: Analytical Essay Ii of King Lear
    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ap Literature: Analytical Essay Ii of King Lear

    Throughout the novel, many of the characters can be pointed out as crazy and disillusioned .As different characters are seen to be talking to themselves and show various sides of their characters, I chose King Lear as one who reveals to me the most surprising and unexpected in the scenes through soliloquies and monologues.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    King Lear
    • 1931 Words
    • 8 Pages

    King Lear

    While both writing King Lear and Candide show a strong connection between the main characters in love and hardship that both characters suffers , The meaning of love was address different in both writing. The hardship that was endured by both main characters one was self-inflicted in the case of King Lear. The other was misfortune in his life in Candide. The road to recovery or redemption was similar and different in both main characters.…

    • 1931 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Gaining Wisdom Through Suffering
    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Gaining Wisdom Through Suffering

    At the beginning of the play, Lear was a selfish man. Power was very important to him. Suffering turned Lear from a selfish man wanted to be treated as a king without having the responsibilities that come with running a kingdom, to a man that comes to realize his morals and values. Lear gave away his kingdom to Gonerial and Regan but still wanted the same status and power of king. Lear gained wisdom through his mistakes of banishing his youngest daughter, Cordelia. Lear comes to the realization of his foolishness in act three. For instance, “Let thunder rumble! Let lightning spit fire! The rain, the wind, the thunder and lightning are not my daughters. Nature, I don’t accuse your weather of unkindness. I never gave a kingdom or raised you as my child, and you don’t owe me any obedience." Here King Lear is coming to terms of his mistake of giving away his kingdom to the wrong people. He then goes on "So go ahead and have your terrifying fun. Here I am, your slave a poor, sick, weak, hated, old man. But I can still accuse you of kowtowing, taking my daughter’s side, against me, ancient as I am. Oh, it’s foul!” In this scene Lear is in the storm with Kent and the fool. In this act the king is turning from an arrogant man to a noble man. It takes king Lear a complete breakdown to realize his mistake.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparison Between King Lear and a Thousand Acres
    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Comparison Between King Lear and a Thousand Acres

    The setting is by a wide margin the largest difference between the two. The setting is responsible for changing most of the rest of the book also. For example, King Lear is in medieval Europe. As a result of this the characters are members of the ruling class. The only people with land of their own back then. Because of their high rank in society the struggle not only affects them, it affects their entire estate. In Lear, because of the setting, the family is fighting over power, wealth, and loyalty. Their estate is a country so many other people are affected by the rift in the Lear family.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Integrity of the Tragedy of King Lear
    • 1443 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Integrity of the Tragedy of King Lear

    The character of King Lear possesses the fatal flaw of hubris. He is arrogant, self-absorbed, an imperious king who is unbelievably unrealistic. Especially in the division of his kingdom, his title always came first and he had little or no understanding of what it meant to be a father or to love as can be seen in Act One nothing will come of nothing. Speak again. Hence Lears suffering from Act Three onwards is a large part of his journey…

    • 1443 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To Kill A Mockingbird Adversity Analysis
    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To Kill A Mockingbird Adversity Analysis

    In King Lear, the parallels between Lear and Gloucester are made clear. Both have loyal and disloyal children, both are blind to the truth and both end up banishing their loyal children and making their disloyal children their heirs.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    King Lear
    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages

    King Lear

    The notion that humanity is possessed only by those who understand and perceive the basic human condition can be seen to be explored in King Lear. Lear’s advancing madness allows him to perceive reality once he is stripped of his title and reduced to “nothing” during the storm scene; that is, that man is merely a “poor, bare, forked animal” and that he, for all his royalty, is “no more than this”. Imagery is utilised to affirm his epiphany and accept his insignificance as a mere mortal. In his humility, Lear is able to understand the values of humanity, demonstrated when he bids Cordelia not to resist being jailed, an indication that he has discovered that true filial love is more important than fighting for the material concepts of rank, property and power.…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Using integrated linguistic and literary approaches compare how sibling relationships are presented in King Lear and The Godfather.
    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Using integrated linguistic and literary approaches compare how sibling relationships are presented in King Lear and The Godfather.

    King Lear is a tragedy written by William Shakespeare in the Jacobean period after King James I of England came to the throne. Tragedies, which centre around dysfunctional families or couples such as Euripides’ Medea, focus on human suffering and require a high status protagonist to make a tragic mistake due to a flaw in his character which makes him human. King Lear’s tragic character flaw is arrogance and in some ways gullibility as he believes his daughters, Regan and Goneril, when they flatter him to gain a share of the kingdom. The key element for tragedies is the protagonist has to die shortly after recognising his error. It is typical for the audience to cry, giving them a cathartic experience.…

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Disruption of Order in King Lear and the Causes
    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Disruption of Order in King Lear and the Causes

    <br><li>Doncaster, Sarah. "Discuss the Representation of Nature in Shakespeare King Lear." Shakespeare Online. <a href="http://www.shakespeare-online.com/essays/learandnature.asp">http://www.shakespeare-online.com/essays/learandnature.asp</a> 04 May. 2000…

    • 1406 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    “King Lear Is a Play Whose Full Meaning Cannot Be Comprehended Because Different Directors Bring Such Different Perspectives to the Text”
    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages

    “King Lear Is a Play Whose Full Meaning Cannot Be Comprehended Because Different Directors Bring Such Different Perspectives to the Text”

    Shakespeare 's tragedy King Lear can be interpreted in many ways and many responses. The imprecision’s and complication of the play has led to its many production. Interpreting the issues and ideas in King Lear is dependant upon each individual responder. Individuals may be influenced by their own personal experiences, moral and ethical standards and the situation of their time.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analyzing King Lear's Speech
    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Analyzing King Lear's Speech

    In Shakespeare’s tragedy “King Lear”, Lear finds himself in a poor situation where he has given up everything, divided up his kingdom between his daughters, and is left with nothing. His daughters, Goneril and Regan, however, have turned against him so that he is now standing alone. Lear delivers this speech after he has been infuriated by his daughters. He is devastated by his daughters’ betrayal and swears revenge against them.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Is King Lear Nihilistic or Hopeful?
    • 3447 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Is King Lear Nihilistic or Hopeful?

    Satisfying, hopeful, and redemptive: some critics would say that these adjectives belong nowhere near a description of King Lear. One critic, Thomas Roche, even states that the play’s ending is “as bleak and unrewarding as man can reach outside the gates of hell” (164). Certainly, Roche’s pessimistic interpretation has merit; after all, Lear has seen nearly everyone he once cared for die before dying himself. Although this aspect of the play is true, agreeing with this negative view requires a person to believe that Lear learns nothing and that he suffers and dies in vain. Indeed, this is exactly what Roche believes when he states that at the play’s end, “Lear still cannot tell good from evil . . . or true from false” (164). This nihilistic approach, however, not only disregards many of the play’s moments of philosophical insight, but it also completely misinterprets Shakespeare’s intent. That is not to say that Lear is without fault at the end of the play; as Shakespeare surely understood, Lear is still human, and as such, he is subject to human frailty. What is most important about Lear, however, is not that he dies a flawed man but that he dies an improved man. Therefore, although King Lear might first appear “bleak,” Shakespeare suggests that Lear’s life, and human life in general, is worth all of its misery because it is often through suffering that people gain knowledge about the true nature of their individual selves and about the nature of all humanity (Roche 164).…

    • 3447 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    King Lear and Morality
    • 1688 Words
    • 7 Pages

    King Lear and Morality

    Cited: Mack, Maynard. “King Lear in Our Time.” The Tragedy of King Lear. Ed. Sylvan Barnet. Toronto: Signet Classic, 1998. 227. Print…

    • 1688 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics