Preview

King Lear Good Vs Evil

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1445 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
King Lear Good Vs Evil
In the bible, the wealthy are generally known as the punished ones and the penury are known as the blessed ones. In the play King Lear, all of the characters exemplify either good or evil. Only one character significantly transitions from evil to good and it is King Lear who does so. His experience in the shoes of a wretch slowly unleashes the truth and develops him into a true, honorable man. King Lear’s dies which seems like a sad ending, but it is magnifying because he dies as a proud man other than a selfish and self-proclaimed king. Throughout the play, King Lear’s character changes from a mad, raged king to a pitiable man that embraces the opportunity of experiencing life of the wretches more than his title as king.
In the beginning of
…show more content…
Moreover, he does not want to put the work in as a king. By saying “darker”, he meant more secret, in which only his two dear earls, Gloucester and Kent know his plan. Also, “darker” has a negative connotation in the quote. This is a great sign of King Lear’s selfishness as well, due to the fact that he does not mind giving up the kingdom to his daughters, but does not have in mind of giving away his title to anyone. At this time in the play, King Lear exemplifies his darker side and unsurprisingly, his character …show more content…
Come; your hovel.
Poor fool and knave, I have one part in my heart
That’s sorry yet for thee.” (King Lear 3.2.67-73)
Kent, the Fool, and Lear are in a storm. This is a major turning point in the development of Lear’s character from an evil to good man. This is also the first time he experiences the feeling of the wretches in the play. It seems strange to him that being a wretch makes him value small things or his true needs. In the quote, the absence of anger or rage is a key component as well because it does not involve anything with Lear and his title as a king. Experiencing the life of a wretch begins to bring out the good side of King Lear. As a “poor man”, King Lear shifts morally, significantly shows compassion instead of anger and it plays a key role in the play. Correspondingly, Lear’s transition from evil to good plays a key role in him dying happy. He dies caring for his daughter, Cordelia, who he hopes has not died, which brings happiness upon him as he dies.
“And my poor fool is hanged. No, no, no life!
Why should a dog, a horse, a rat have life
And thou no breath at all? O thou’lt come no more,
Never, never, never, never, never.
Pray you undo this button. Thank you, sir.
O, o, o,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare's King Lear is a play revolving around the themes of human nature, madness and childishness.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In King Lear virtually every character is either a fool or a knave; however these terms contain multiple layers. The crucial scene in which this idea is presented in the play is act 2 scene 4 when the Fool talks to Kent after he has been put in the stocks, and more specifically his line “The knave turns fool that runs away;/ The fool no knave, perdy.” On one level the Fool is mocking Kent for his loyalty towards Lear despite the fact that Lear’s fortunes have disintegrated, and seems to imply that a clever knave would grab the “great wheel” that is Lear, when his fortunes are up and drop him when they are down. Yet, the Fool also says that a self-interested knave “who serves and seeks for gain” abandons his friends while the virtuous fool will “tarry” and “stay”. Elizabethan England was a very hierarchical society that demanded absolute deference be paid to the wealthy and the powerful, however King Lear demonstrates how fragile this society actually was; parents and noblemen were vulnerable to the depredations of the unscrupulous younger generation. In this way Shakespeare divides society within the play and allows the viewer to make a moral decision as to whose side they choose. Aristotle believed that the very nature of ‘tragedy’ has a cathartic effect on the viewer, purging him of negative emotion, but there is also a sense that this genre of play forces us to choose some characters over others, and Shakespeare depicts the fools in the play, both honest and loyal and willing to weather out the storm with those who are suffering, as the positive characters we sympathise with and ‘choose’ above the clearly selfish knaves.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this brief quote from Shakespeare’s play King Lear he is making a statement about the rich vs. the poor and how it is easy to see the wrong performed by the poor however it is easy to justify the wrong done by the individuals with a large pocket book. When I take a look around, read a newspaper, or watch the channel eight news it is very clear to me that Lear’s statement is, however unfortunate and unfair, true as it accurately represents the injustice of today.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    He who controls others may be powerful, but he who has mastered himself is mightier still. Good afternoon/morning ladies and gentlemen. Power is a debatable concept, constituting questions such as what actually defines true power, authoritative power vs. personal power and why individuals seek power. These ideas are explored in Shakespeare’s play King Lear and Gabriele Muccino's film The Pursuit of Happyness through their language features and structure.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    King Lear is a tragedy written by William Shakespeare in the Jacobean period after King James I of England came to the throne. Tragedies, which centre around dysfunctional families or couples such as Euripides’ Medea, focus on human suffering and require a high status protagonist to make a tragic mistake due to a flaw in his character which makes him human. King Lear’s tragic character flaw is arrogance and in some ways gullibility as he believes his daughters, Regan and Goneril, when they flatter him to gain a share of the kingdom. The key element for tragedies is the protagonist has to die shortly after recognising his error. It is typical for the audience to cry, giving them a cathartic experience.…

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Lear Research Paper

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the play King Lear by William Shakespeare, King Lear is an old foolish man who suffers several flaws in the same way, he is blind to the truth, and his inability to see the truth impacts his decisions making and his poor judgment. Throughout act one and two, King Lear decisions lead to several consequences, which alter his life and the lives of those around him. A few of King Lear’s flaws which demonstrates the great deed of one man’s consequences are, his actions due to his blindness, rash decision making and exhibits a great deed of pride and arrogance.…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare in Lear, presents the notion that characters in great authority force suffering upon others in an effort to retain power, admiration, and status. Initially, Lear himself demonstrates this, appallingly treating Cordelia with an irrational snap judgement when he is embarrassed in court by his youngest daughters silence and lack of praise; “Here I disclaim all my parental care.” (1:1:107) This unjust sentence is highly ironic, especially for the audience, as dramatically we see transparent farce of Gonerill and Regan’s dedications of love, and the total truth of Cordelia’s. Due to the “infirmity of his age” (1:1:284) (Lear) the unjust pain Cordelia endures for his mistake is greatened, and due to this dramatic irony the audience is forever hopeful for some form of justice and resolution to come.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The character of King Lear possesses the fatal flaw of hubris. He is arrogant, self-absorbed, an imperious king who is unbelievably unrealistic. Especially in the division of his kingdom, his title always came first and he had little or no understanding of what it meant to be a father or to love as can be seen in Act One nothing will come of nothing. Speak again. Hence Lears suffering from Act Three onwards is a large part of his journey…

    • 1443 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Does King Lear Change

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although tormented by the fact that even when he was important and had value he held nothing, he was also confronted with the physical issues his selfishness had caused other people, like his Fool who followed him into the storm, and Kent his loyal servant who had been exiled, or even his entire kingdom whom he hadn’t taken care of properly. After this realization, Lear’s perspective of the word “nothing” changed. While Lear had to lose everything to really understand what it meant to have nothing, Kent and Cordelia demonstrated that the true value of their loyalty remained in their actions not their words. What makes this a tragedy aside from death and Lear’s hamartia, is the Kings’ inevitable full turn of the wheel. Once he realized where he had gone wrong, there was no way to stop what came next. However, in the end it did not mattered for Lear learned the true meaning of love and what it meant to have something. He might have had it all and lost it, but when Cordelia forgave him and saw her once again, he wished for nothing more, because he had realized her love did not belong to her tongue but her heart, one that despite his ignorance, forgave him, brought him peace and wisdom.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Lear

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Lear’s hamartia is primarily exposed through his unappeasable need for self-appraisal. His narcissistic conduct is brought on by his need for flattery and is the reason for his vulnerability to extreme reaction. As Lear seeks self-appraisal in the first act, he is gravely disappointed in his youngest daughter’s response: “… I cannot heave / My heart into my mouth. I love your majesty / According to my bond, no more nor less.” (I.i.90-92) Her sheer honesty and refusal to give in to his test expose the King’s tragic flaw, as he acts rashly in banishing Cordelia along with his loyal friend Kent. Not only is Lear insulted by her refusal of appraisal, but his vanity inhibits him from being reasonable as he cannot accept that his daughter does not love him more than a daughter ought love her father. Lear tragically misinterprets reality and his injured pride leads him to anger, causing him to act without contemplation. The King’s unbridled fury leads to his unbearable suffering as it unfolds through further action. Through the effect of his hamartia, the King acts without reason and consequently loses his most beloved daughter.…

    • 1159 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare's Context

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages

    William Shakespeare is one of the most successful and well-known playwrights in the world. His plays even though from a way back in the past have still survived today and are still held in very high esteem. The context of William Shakespeare’s King Lear proposes many differences from our world today.…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    He’s been left out in the storm with nowhere to go and is begging to go mad. After being kicked out of his kingdom Lear has a realization that he was ignorant and unaware of what was going on around him. King Lear was blind to Kent’s real intentions and what Kent was really trying to show Lear. Kent begins by saying:…

    • 1547 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    First of all, it is important to know a brief history of King Lear. He is an aging man who is loyal and a father that is loving to his daughters. Lear is identified as very generous especially when he tends to give away most of his responsibilities as a king to his daughters. As innocent and clueless as he is, king Lear simply becomes shocked and upset by his daughters betraying their own father. Later on in the novel, Lear’s whole personality transforms, as he rejects power and politics. Instead, he realizes the most crucial matter is being with the people that he loves. Soon, after seeing poor Tom, he spends precious time with thoughts and feelings for him. All of this information clearly shows how sympathetic and pure King Lear truly is throughout the novel, until 4.6.172-191, which unexpectedly reveals King Lear in a different way.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the tragedy King Lear, William Shakespeare tells a story of sibling rivalry, the necessity of human action rather than fate to administer justice, and loyalty and lack thereof among several other themes. All of these specific themes are eventually tied in with violence during the play. This use of violence allows Shakespeare to not only comment on his modern society (Elizabethan England) but to also reveal a darker side to mankind. Shakespeare’s use of violence in King Lear emphasizes major themes such as loyalty, sibling rivalry, and justice which in turn reveals how cruel mankind can be. The fact that characters from all levels of society take violent actions reveals how Shakespeare is really making a commentary on all of mankind rather…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lear is in the French army quarters with his daughter Cordelia, he has been sleeping for awhile. Cordelia wakes the king, and at first it seems as if Lear is still mad and thinks Cordelia is a ghost. However, the doctor claims that it is only due to the fact that he is still half asleep. Lear proves his sanity, calling himself a, “foolish fond old man”, that he might not be, “in my perfect mind”, but he thinks he should remember Cordelia and Kent. Lear proves his sanity by accepting his circumstances and actually does see clearly now. Shakespeare gives closure in this subject with the doctor, “Be comforted, good madam. The great rage, you see, is killed in him…”(4.7.91). Shakespeare doesn’t just leave it here though, in the final scene of the play he presents Lear in his full sanity. Edmund sentences Lear and Cordelia to jail and Cordelia tells Lear that she is worried about him. Lear proclaims that he is fine and goes on to describe how jail won’t be that bad, because they will be together, “So we’ll live, // And pray, and sing, and tell old tales, and laugh…”(5.3.12). Lear has finally completed his journey, he has finally reached sanity once again, but Shakespeare will test him once more. Shakespeare didn’t intend for this to be the end for Lear. As Lear clutches the dead body of his beloved daughter, it seems as if he briefly falls back into madness. This is Lear’s final test, the final tragedy. However, he is only sad, mournful beyond extreme, and in his despair he cannot see clearly. As he holds the deceased body of Cordelia, he dies of sorrow. Kent, watching Lear die, tells everyone to leave him alone, “Vex not his ghost. O, let him pass! He hates him // That would upon the rack of this tough world // stretch him out longer.”(5.3.380) Shakespeare leaves the ending open, he does not give Lear a happy ending, but he did complete Lear’s journey, as Lear died with a sane, but sorrowful…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics