top-rated free essay

King Lear - Fool's Character

Oct 08, 1999 1192 Words
Many directors argue over the importance of the character of the Fool in the play. Discuss whether or not you feel the Fool is essential to the play or whether or not the character could be removed without damaging the overall impact. Make a reference to the text to support your ideas. <br>

<br>William Shakespeare's genius came from how closely he intertwined the two seemingly mutually exclusive realms to appeal to all socio-economic groups in his audience. The character of the Fool provides the closest intercourse of the two realms between King Lear's royalty and Poor Tom's poverty, while still maintaining their separation. The Fool's role in King Lear was to counteract the King's follies in order to bring him to his senses. With his honesty, wit, and clever wordplay that interweave foreshadowing and practical advice, the Fool entertains not only the King, but the audience as well, and brings some light and humour into this tragedy. All the characters in King Lear, apart from the Fool, are interconnected and of great importance to the story of King Lear and his daughters and the story of Edmund, Edgar and Gloucester. The character of the Fool did not have influence over Lear's decision to divide the kingdom, nor did the Fool have any connection with the subplot. Perhaps, for this reason many directors argue over the importance of his character. One should be able to realize that the presence of the Fool did not influence the overall impact of the play and that the two major plots would have occurred with him or without him. Personally, I believe that his character should not be excluded from the play as this would damage the balance of tragedy versus comedy that was deliberately set up by Shakespeare, which would result in a loss of audience. <br>

<br>There is a saying that goes, "Only fools and children tell the truth". Shakespeare does a great job of illustrating this saying through the Fool's character. The Fool is being loyal and honest to his master Lear no matter how painful the truth may sound. In Act 1, Scene 4, in the introduction of his character, the Fool is playing with his hat and tells the king, "…thou must needs wear my coxcomb," stating that the king is a fool for dividing his kingdom in such a way after a ridiculous love test (line 101). In the same scene the Fool also mentions, "thou madest thy daughters thy mother," meaning that Lear has made his daughters his parents (line 168-169). One should perceive that in this first Act the Fool appears and speaks of reality to the King who was blinded by flatteries of his evil daughters. He tacitly insinuates through his actions and statements that Lear is among the company of fools, which provides the hint of foreshadowing the audience needs to know that Lear is losing his wits. However, where was the Fool when the King made his decision to divide the kingdom? Obviously the King did not think it was important for the Fool to be employed in political or family matters. Important matters as such were none of his business. Thus, the Fool did not have any influence over King's decision and therefore, over the major plot of the play. <br>

<br>In the following scene the Fool tries to convince Lear of his mistake again and informs him that Regan will, "…taste as like this as a crab does to a crab," meaning that Regan and Goneril are of the same nature and that there is no need for him to go to her after Goneril has rejected his knights (Act1, Scene 5, line 18). However, this does not stop the King from going to meet with his other daughter. The Fool again had no influence over King's actions and he follows the King to Regan's palace. In the meantime, the subplot of the play develops where Edmund proceeds with his evil plan. The character of the Fool has no connections with the subplot, therefore, he is unable to influence its overall impact. <br>

<br>At the very end of Act 2 when the King was insulted and hurt by both of his daughters, he rushes out of Gloucester's castle into the storming night. The Fool follows the King through his misery like a shadow until he realizes that Lear has erred in his judgment of his daughters and in giving away his kingdom. The Fool's exit from the play and his last line, "And I'll go to bed at noon," is appropriate as it is ridiculous as King's previous behaviour in the storm (Act 3, Scene 6, line 84). The Fool does not reappear later in the play. He was needed to be Lear's guide and conscious during his fall. There is no doubt at this point that Lear has been driven to insanity and is beyond the help of the Fool and his truth telling and eye opening remarks. After all, the Fool did not have any control over King's behaviour or his actions. Perhaps, this final exit is due to Lear's madness. The Fool's character jumps into the play at the end of Act 1, and in the same manner disappears out of the play at the end of Act 3. Subsequently, the presence of the Fool did not change the rules of the game and his disappearance did not affect the consequences of the war and death that followed. Thus, the Fool's character had no influence over the final impact of the play. <br>

<br>The character of the Fool was not needed anymore to amuse the audience or the King or to connect the in-between of royalty and poverty. The vanishing of the Fool foreshadowed cruelty, war and death. As a Fool, he would be unable to prevent the battles anyways. He was not needed anymore to come up with riddles and humour in Shakespeare's tragedy. <br>

<br>Since the Fool's character had no influence over King's actions and no connections with the subplot of the play, his removal would therefore not influence the overall impact of the play. However, through his bewildering statements the Fool adds an intriguing essence to the play in foreshadowing coming events and in amusing the King and the audience. When directing his own plays, Shakespeare made sure to include the character of the Fool, as in this way, he managed to bring his tragedy to equilibrium and his play to appeal to all the socio-economic groups of the audience. Also, there aren't many plays or movies that suggest the connection between the King and the jester in his court. I believe that this play reveals much of that friendly connection that the audience is asking for. Therefore, for all these reasons, I believe that the character of the Fool should not be taken out of the play even though it doesn't have a role in the two major plots of the play.

Cite This Document

Related Documents

  • King Lear Character Analysis

    ...Character Analysis King Lear- King Lear is first presented in the first scene as an egocentric man who is ignorant of the many flaws in his personality. Lear has formed himself a personality and defined himself as an individual and utterly refuses to give up this vision of himself, one can only imagine the figure that Lear must have once been ...

    Read More
  • King Lear -- Sympathetic Characters

    ...King Lear -- Sympathetic Characters A sympathetic character, is a character that the writer expects the reader (in this case watcher) to identify with and care about. In Shakespeare's play King Lear, the characters Gloucester and King Lear both start out not being liked by the reader because they come off as mean and cold. By the end of...

    Read More
  • King Lear Character Notes

    ...Play summary King Lear opens with a conversation between the earls of Kent and Gloucester, in which the audience learns that Gloucester has two sons: Edgar, who is his legitimate heir, and Edmund, his younger illegitimate son. This information will provide the secondary or subplot. Next, King Lear enters to state that he intends to remove hims...

    Read More
  • Women Characters in King Lear

    ...Jornades de Foment de la Investigació ARE THE FEMALE CHARACTERS STEREOTYPED IN KING LEAR AS DEMONISED OR SANCTIFIED WOMEN? Autor Benjamín Donat Rubio Are the female characters stereotyped in king lear as demonised or sanctified women? Before analysing female characters in King Lear, we will comment on the main critical approaches ...

    Read More
  • king Lear

    ... King Lear was written by Shakespeare which is the one of his great tragedies that portrays human suffering and redemption through the experiences of the play’s major characters ; King Lear and Gloucester. All tragedies that Shakespeare wrote have a tragic hero and each of them has a tragic flaw. The play focuses on the suffering...

    Read More
  • King Lear

    ...Throughout King Lear, Shakespeare combines many ideas, and techniques in order to allow the reader to fully understand the morals behind the main themes, Sight and blindness. This is achieved by integrating techniques which stem from the central plot in order to add and explain additional ideas and devices such as deception, and inversion. Sight...

    Read More
  • King Lear

    ...King Lear is widely regarded as Shakespeare's crowning artistic achievement. The scenes in which a mad Lear rages naked on a stormy heath against his deceitful daughters and nature itself are considered by many scholars to be the finest example of tragic lyricism in the English language. Shakespeare took his main plot line of an aged monarch abu...

    Read More
  • King Lear

    ...King Lear : Clothing Imagery Hamza,Saharded,Younes,Deion Learning Objective In King Lear the role of clothing is a recurrent image that Shakespeare uses to underscore certain themes in the play. Discussion Questions -Do clothes have an influence on the weares mindset? use examples from the book or personal exper...

    Read More

Discover the Best Free Essays on StudyMode

Conquer writer's block once and for all.

High Quality Essays

Our library contains thousands of carefully selected free research papers and essays.

Popular Topics

No matter the topic you're researching, chances are we have it covered.