Kim Davis Argumentative Essay

Kim Davis refusing to give the marriage license to the gay couple is unethical, because she based her reasons on her own religious belief, because not all people who share the same belief. I argue against the unethical behavior of Kim Davis. My opponent argues that Kim Davis has the right to religion; therefore she could act on her religious belief. Persons such as Kim Davis, who choose to use their authority to promote anti-gay views of people, cause harm to homosexuals, which is unethical. Kim Davis has an ethical obligation to obey the law; although, she has her own beliefs. The government of the United States has legalized gay marriage since June 26, 2015 (De Vogue and Diamond). Kim’s decision to refuse to give the marriage license to
Some people are attracted the opposite sex whiles some are attracted to the same sex. A homosexual person is no different from heterosexual persons. Thus, homosexuals are to be given the permit to choose who they want to spend their life. If marriage is legally acceptable to heterosexual couples, it should be legalized for homosexual couples, because they have equal rights and must have equal opportunities. My opponent may describe marriage as a union between a man and a woman not a man and a man or a woman and a woman. My opponents may feel that gay marriage is an abomination in the sight of God and
Others argue, “she is supposed to set her personal views aside, that she is obliged, as an officer in court and an elected official, to serve those she represents equally and fairly without exception or exemption.” (Peter Roff). Kim Davis did not promote “usefulness” to get pleasure. Kim thought she knew what was best for her, but did not consider the happiness everyone will get at the end of the day. Kim should follow the rules that bring about the most happiness in the day. The consequences of allowing gay marriages could be a good consequences depending on the end