Great Debates in Economics: Keynes vs Hayek
2. Keynes believed that it was a waste to save money and it only lead to destruction and prevent economic growth. He didn’t agree with private investment. He felt by keeping money in your pocket is senseless because soon we will all be dead. You can’t take the money with you. He also felt that the government should increase spending during times of recessions. Hayek believed that you must save money so that you could later invest the money wisely. He felt time would multiply your interest. He felt that time did not matter. He believed the same principles of the economy that applied in the 1920 still applied in 2005. The solution was not to print more money, but to invest the money the money saved.
3. Keynes and Hayek had major disagreements. Keynes feels that his efforts to stimulate the economy worked. He felt his success was noted even in 2009. He felt that more government spending would have led to more economic growth. Keynes felt the acts of war were unfortunate; however, there is no denying it stimulates the economy. Hayek disagreed with war. He felt that war should not be a tool to stimulate the economy. He felt that it only destroyed other economies leaving them in despair. He felt that Keynes did not address the true issues. He stated that consumption shrank and scarce resources were misused. Keynes stated that people were taken off production jobs to be employed by the military. He felt the investment made in wars would not correct market failures and would not assure an equitable distribution of income. He felt more damage was done that good.
4. Keynes believed that the development of policies and government intervention would reduce economic instability and correct market failures. Hayek believed that the economy’s stability was determined by the market participants and the decision makers along with incentives to engage in productive commerce.
Reference: Microeconomics, 14e, Gwartney, Stroup, Sobel, Macpherson www.reuters.com www.adamsmith.org
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
4. When output and employment slowed in early 2008, the Bush Administration and the Democratic Congress passed a legislation sending households a check for $600 for each adult (and $300 per child). These checks were financed by borrowing. Would a Keynesian favor this action? Yes, because Keynesian are in favor of government influence on the economy.…
- 250 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
John Maynard Keynes helped the allied government defend freedom by planning their wartime economies. Friedrich Von Hayek thought government interference in the economy was a threat to freedom. Keynes thought the market economy would go to excesses and when things got difficult the market wouldn’t work and the government would have to fix it. Hayek disagreed because he believed the market would take care of itself.…
- 944 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Keynes believed that classic liberalism itself was unstable. You need government intervention to straighten some issues out.…
- 826 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
views. Although they disagreed on things, they both hoped for a better economy. Both policies…
- 1158 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The traditional Keynesian approach to fiscal policy differs in three ways from that is presented in the Fiscal Policy Chapter in your textbook.…
- 483 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
b. “Reaganomics” / Supply-side economics: seeking to increase the economies capacity to produce. the theory behind it was exxessive taxation was slowing things down in the economy, and it discouraged hard work? have economic growth by cutting taxes…so people could invest that money in another way. Trickle down economics: leave the money to the wealthy and it will trickle down into society.…
- 979 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
* The effectiveness of those fiscal policy recommendations from the Keynesian and Classical model perspectives.…
- 1095 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The You tube video Fear the Boom and Bust is a very entertaining and interesting rap debate between the two economists, John Maynard Keynes and Freidrich Hayek, concerning the boom and bust cycle. In the video the economists come back to life and rap about their conflicting theories as they go out for a night on the town. This video is a fun and educational way to learn and discuss the two competing economic philosophies and how they relate to our current economic situation. The two economists go back and forth advancing their economic perspectives on economic issues as their approach to the market, government and consumer spending, the role of savings, human action and motivation and the power of investments. It is pretty amazing how the creators of this rap were able to take economic theories and turn them into catchy lyrics. The chorus of this rap sums up the basic conflict between the economists. Keynes and Hayek both rap that “We've been going back and forth for a century” and Keynes says he wants to “steer markets” and Hayek says he wants them “set free”. They both rap together “There's a boom and bust cycle and good reason to fear it” as Hayek blames “low interest rates” and Keynes disagrees and says “it's the animal spirits” implying the bulls and bears. Then each economists views are summarized in two verses. Keynes stresses that in order to get the economy out of the bust they need to utilize the stimulus of government spending so that if consumers have money and spend it then businesses will thrive and create jobs. However, Hayek says it is not the bust that is the main problem but the boom. He says that allowing low interest rates and extending credit encourage investments that cannot be maintained over time and raps that “The boom plants the seeds for its future destruction”. As we see from our current economic problems that the government turned more to Keynes approach to deal with the financial crisis by stimulating markets with…
- 389 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Keynes put forth the belief that a government in times of economic despair should spend money and go into a deficit in order to build the economy back up and then when the economy is stable again should then grow a surplus. Many people and governments stood behind this principle. During the Great Depression President Franklin Roosevelt used this strategy in implementing his New Deal. He created new government agencies to put the unemployed citizens to work. The strategy continued as we entered into World War II. After entering World War II and the jobs that were needed on the home front to support the war effort the United States was able to pull out of the Depression.…
- 364 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Hayek found a few faults with Keynesian Economics. First off he pointed out that Keynes’s argument about savings is actually an argument about the dangers of hoarding. “It’s agreed that hoarding money is deflationary in its effects. No one thinks that deflation is in itself desirable.” So…
- 617 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Review Chapter 7: Classical Macroeconomics and the Keynesian Challenge and Chapter 9: Taxes, Government Spending, and Fiscal Policy.…
- 652 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
* The term fiscal policy refers to the federal government’s deliberate use of its taxation rates and expenditures to affect overall business activity. The Keynesian economists and the supply-side economists have two theories about how to obtain stabilization. Keynesian economists advocate the use of government spending to stimulate economic activity and reduce unemployment during recessions. A simple circular flow of income and output model is given. Supply-side economists advocate reductions in tax rates to stimulate private investment and employment.…
- 474 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
2. The chorus of the rap has Keynes saying "I want to control markets" and Hayek saying "I want to set [markets] free." Is either of those positions right or wrong in all circumstances? Under what circumstances is more government intervention in markets warranted, and under what circumstances should the government stay out as much as possible?…
- 520 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
2. "The Fed should simply increase the money supply at the same rate that the full employment economy grows, and the government should desist from any stabilizing urges." What school of thought would make this suggestion, and how do economists of that school…
- 994 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Ever since the 1980s when President Ronald Reagan implemented a form of economic fiscal policy known as supply-side economics, there has been a continuing debate over whether a supply-side fiscal economic agenda or a more demand-side, Keynesian fiscal economic policy is more effective in promoting short and long-term real GDP growth. Like any analysis in economics, there are many variables at work in the economy, however the purpose of this paper is to try and isolate a few key variables in the economy such as unemployment, real GDP, consumer spending, the federal budget, and inflation in order to formulate a conclusion which can determine which economic ideology is more effective in promoting growth in the short and long-term in terms of real GDP. As a result of my historical analysis, I will show that neither extreme supply-side or demand-side economic theory is suitable in all economic climates. In order to promote sustainable real GDP growth, we must model our economic theory around the principles of the 1950s and 1980s which include fiscal conservatism, moderate tax rates, and productive government spending.…
- 8545 Words
- 35 Pages
Powerful Essays