Preview

Kevin Rudd's Apology Analysis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1165 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kevin Rudd's Apology Analysis
Analysis: Aspect One
Kevin Rudd’s apology was to the Aboriginals; but in particular, to the Stolen Generations. From 1909-1969, the Australian Government forced a policy know as assimilation upon the Aboriginals. Assimilation is the forced integration of minority groups onto the dominant society. Inhumane acts were inflicted upon these proud people because of the ‘Aborigines Protection Board’ which entailed that the Australian Government had full rights to forcibly remove half-caste children from Aboriginal care without parental consent nor a court order.
When the Australian Government passed these laws of discrimination against the Aborigines, they never thought of them as human beings but rather an inferior race that had to be taken care of. The family and friends would always desperately plead for mercy but to no avail. Due to these unethical actions taken by the government, Kevin Rudd apologized to the Aboriginals and especially to the Stolen Generations. “We apologize especially for the removal of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children from their families, their communities and their country.
For the pain, suffering and hurt of these stolen generations, their descendants and for their families left behind, we say sorry.
To the mothers and the fathers, the brothers and the sisters, for the breaking up of families and communities, we say sorry.
And for the indignity and degradation thus inflicted on a proud people and a proud culture, we say sorry.”
Kevin Rudd referred to four key indignities that the Aboriginals were put through: the removal of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children from their families, the pain, suffering and hurt of these stolen generations, the breaking up of families and the indignity and degradation that was imposed on a proud people and culture.
The exact number of children that were taken is unknown; however, it is estimated that around 100,000 were taken from their families; 100,000 children that were sorely

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The Mabo Decision

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages

    However, the initial announcement of the apology caused a split in the Liberal party, as some believed that it would create a guilty culture in Australia. Yet, Judi Moylan, who was the former Liberal Minister, said “I think as a nation we owe an apology. We shouldn't be thinking about it as an individual apology — it's an apology that is coming from the nation state because it was governments that did these things.” The apology was then considered necessary. At 9:30 on the day of the speech, Kevin Rudd began the apology. “...The time has now come for the nation to turn a new page in Australia's history by righting the wrongs of the past and so moving forward with confidence to the future. We apologise for the laws and policies of successive parliaments and governments that have inflicted profound grief, suffering and loss on these our fellow Australians. We apologise especially for the removal of ATSI children from their families, their communities and their country...We the parliament of Australia respectfully request that this apology be received in the spirit in which it is offered as part of the healing of the nation….” The speech was a significant moment in ATSI peoples lives, as, according the to The Bringing Them Home Report, this was the first step to healing and was largely symbolic and important in ATSI…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Assessment 2 Essay

    • 1984 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The ‘Stolen Generations’ is a term used to describe the actions of which Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, mostly children, were taken away from their families between the 1890’s and the 1970’s (Korff, 2014). Children were taken to institutions or adopted by non-Indigenous families and most never saw their families again. In the early 1900’s the Australian public was persuaded into believing Aboriginal children were deprived, mistreated and at risk in their own communities. People believed that Aboriginal children would receive a better education, a more loving and caring family and a more civilised upbringing if adopted by white families or government institutions. In reality Aboriginal children were being removed so that they could be introduced to ‘Anglo values’ and ‘work habits’. Their reasoning behind this was that Indigenous children would be employed by colonial settlers, and would stop their biological parents, families and communities from passing on their culture, language and identity to them (Nsdc.org.au, n.d.). The children that the authorities targeted for removal had one parent that was white and the other was Indigenous. The Aboriginal protection boards believed that by separating these children from their families and communities, culture and land, that assimilation…

    • 1984 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Noel Pearson Summary

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Pearson’s speech, the criticism of John Howard, who was at the time the Prime Minister, throughout the speech shows the idea that the past Australian Governments had made a mistake in treating Aboriginal Australians in the past, and that modern day government is trying to forget that past because of the guilt and shame it had caused the Australian government in the past. Pearson directly quotes comments made by John Howard during a radio interview, but uses these comments to emphasise his own key arguments rather than support those being made by Howard. By using quotes from other sources he broadens the scope of his argument and makes his own argument less of a personal crusade. Pearson also focuses on National Identity and determining “who we are”. Pearson acknowledges the current debate of National Identity by making reference to the “hot button issue” about “the guilt about Australia’s colonial Identity”. The extended metaphor of button pressing and the cliché “You would not need to be a political genius” stresses the “great electoral resonance” of the National Identity debate. Another technique Pearson applies is the use of inclusive language in his speech. This is cleverly woven into the speech by repeated references to “our nation” and the action that “we” have to take to correct the injustices of the past. This facilitates Pearson’s depiction of Aboriginal rights being a social, political, legal and religious concern for the nation as a whole and thus presents Pearson’s view on National Identity and the global perception of “who we are”. The past shows that Australia as a nation…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Noel Pearson

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Noel Pearson’s speech, ‘An Australian History for us All,’ explores the divides between our community and the issues that prevent us as a nation from achieving reconciliation. Ultimately, throughout his exordium Pearson is excessively humble, ‘it is my honour to have been invited… Alas, I cannot promise my teacher’s rigour ,’ this diminution of his prominent political position equalises Pearson with his audience. He successfully characterises himself as being selflessly modest, a successful tool in capturing our attention, his choice to do this in the exordium is also an example of kairos, his appealing attitude is naturally attractive, guaranteeing our fixated attention throughout the duration of his speech. Pearson additionally employs a variety of quotes to both enforce his credibility and portray society’s ignorant attitude towards reconciliation. We see this when he quotes Professor Bill Stanner, the ‘Great Australian Silence,’ becomes a metaphor of our refusal to address the Aboriginal struggle on a national level, objectifying the Australian nation as absent minded. Furthermore, Pearson makes noticeable appeals to pathos and logos, encouraging an emotional and logical response identifiable by all of us. Pearson in his battle for reconciliation, provides syllogistic reasoning and structure on solving the inherent ‘guilt’ issue, ‘it is not about guilt. It is about opening our hearts a little bit… and to have an open and generous heart…means that when you acknowledge the wrongs of the past, you might try to do so ungrudgingly… there must be some respect for that.’ Additionally, the inclusive pronouns that Pearson employs in this statement make his proposed solution exclusive, applying to both indigenous and non indigenous peoples as such he unites his audience, generating logos through the universal nature and structural flow of his statement. Additionally, Pearson goes on to compare the reasoning he provides to the internationally notorious issue of Jewish…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Noel Pearson, one of Australia’s most influential Aboriginal leaders, delivered his speech to a highly distinguished academic audience at a time when Australia was struggling with “moral and political turbulence” regarding “guilt about Australia’s colonial history”. Pearson expresses his own thoughts on Aboriginal reconciliation and the necessary steps that need to…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While Pearson’s speech was delivered at an academic gathering, Bandler had a more mixed audience including mainly Indigenous peoples and politicians, both supporting and opposing additional rights for aboriginal people. Pearson’s and Bandler’s speeches were both written in the 1990s, a contentious and heated time in relation ind issues. Pearson’s speech, in particular, was a response to the changing attitudes of the newly elected Howard government in 1996, who took the view that present day Australians shouldn’t feel responsible for the past injustices done to the aborigines- a different view from the previous Keating government. Bandler’s speech was a response to the entire Australian population’s inability to accept the guilt of the past, which she felt was hindering the progress of reconciliation between Aborigines and Europeans. Both Pearson, a high profile indigenous activist, and Bandler, a highly respected civil rights activist, gave their speeches in an attempt to take a step forward in the quest to conquer the differences between aborigines and other Australians and explore the ways the country as a whole could move forward from the horrible past.…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aboriginals Essay

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Change's in the 20th century Australian government policy, and how these changes have affected the rights and freedoms of Aboriginal people.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ruby Moon Play Analysis

    • 2237 Words
    • 9 Pages

    * Retelling of the immeasurable injustice done to the Indigenous Australians and stereotyping them to beings that result to acts as an after effect of the policy…

    • 2237 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the European invasion in 1788, Aboriginals have been treated poorly by the Australian government and have struggled to retain their rights and freedoms. Conflict emerged as the British colony expanded and Aboriginal land was taken from them. Due to conflict between the Aborigines and the British settlers, they were treated poorly and were refused rights and freedom. They were at risk under unfair industrial relations processes where they were not awarded equal pay, poor access to housing and reasonable living conditions, and on-going discrimination in Australian society. Overtime, aborigines contested leading to the change unequal government policies allowing them to obtain land rights, the reconciliation after issue with the stolen generation and the 1967 referendum which resulted with the inclusion of aborigines in the Australian constitution.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stolen Generation

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The forced removal of Aboriginal and Torres Islander children was forcefully taken away from their families between the 1890’s and the 1969.The children were given to churches, missionary institutes and some children were given to white families. Most of the children never saw their families again; more than 100,000 children were removed from their families…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The underlying aim of this policy was the idea that the Aboriginal race could be bred out of existence and so by separating children from their families and traditional background, it was hoped that they would adopt European culture and behavior. The children taken away lost their language, spirituality and self-esteem and most importantly loss of cultural affiliation. Since they were denied any traditional knowledge Stolen Generations cannot take a role in the cultural and spiritual life of their Aboriginal communities. “I don’t know nothing about my culture. I don’t know nothing about the land and the language,” says Cynthia Sariago after her mothers passing. “It’s hard going back to your home country because you’re not really accepted by…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “We apologise for the laws and policies of successive Parliaments and governments that have inflicted profound grief, suffering and loss on these our fellow Australians… And for the indignity and degradation thus inflicted on a proud people and a proud culture, we say sorry”.…

    • 4085 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    On the 10th of December 1992 Prime Minister Paul Keating gave an urgent speech to the citizens of Australia concerning the injustice against indigenous Australians and their rights. This speech gives the audience a thorough idea of the discrimination that they are facing and a number of reasons in which persuading us to stop our detrimental ways towards the Aboriginals so that they may feel as a contributing race to the Australian society. This speech was carried out in a well thought out structure and highlighted some very real and distressing problems at the time.…

    • 2071 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The treatment of Indigenous Australians by the government has been an issue of controversy since White Europeans settled in Australia. Throughout history Aboriginals have developed and hosted many protests, sometimes with the help of the White Europeans that wanted to make a difference to get back rights and freedoms of Aboriginals.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Jason A. Edwards’ (2010) article “Apologizing for the Past for a Better Future,” he examines the phenomena of collective apology made by the political leaders of Canada, Australia and America. All these political leaders apologized for the damages caused by historical wrongdoings because of bad decision making during wars or other situations.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics