Preview

Karl Marx and Capitalism

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1349 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Karl Marx and Capitalism
Karl Marx and Capitalism
9056-60463
Word Count: 1113

In this essay, I argue that Karl Marx’s explanation of capitalism should compel the average person to action and change. First, I explain Marx’s idea of capitalism and how it hinders the average person. Second, I discuss how Marx argues for consciousness, criticism, anti-alienation, and anti-exploitation. Third, I provide and answer possible counter examples for Marx’s ideas on communism and capitalism. Finally, I address some of the ways that Marx might respond to my observations and objections. Capitalism is defined by Marx as a socio-economic system based especially on private ownership of the means of production and the exploitation of the labor force. (Felluga) Commodification is the process of a human’s value being replaced by his or her monetary value. (Felluga) Marx uses the terms proletariat, bureaucracy, and aristocrats, which essentially mean lower, middle, and upper classes, respectively. (Marx, Manifesto) The means of production is a term for the tools and raw materials used to create a product. Marx argues that capitalism functions as “the circulation of money as capital is an end in itself, for the valorization of value takes place only within this constantly renewed movement. The movement of capital is therefore limitless” (Marx, Capital) Marx argues that because the movement of capital is limitless, then capitalists strive for “the unceasing movement of profit-making” (Marx, Capital). I claim that this socio-economic system promotes a competition for basic needs to humans by putting prices, and since everyone aims to obtain all assets, some people will ultimately be left without basic needs. Marx instead argues for a more communal distribution of the means of production for the people would allow a better life for everyone. Marx argues that consciousness is something people develop overtime rather than it being inherently human. Marx is weary of false consciousness, which is the



Cited: Felluga, Dino. "Marxism Terms." Marxism Terms. Purdue U., 1 Jan. 2011. Web. 29 July 2013. Marx, Karl. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Harmondsworth: Penguin in Association with New Left Review, 1990. Print. Marx, Karl. "Letters: Letters from the Deutsch-Französische Jahrbücher." Letters: Letters from the Deutsch-Französische Jahrbücher by Karl Marx. N.p., July 2013. Web. 27 July 2013. Marx, Karl. "Manifesto of the Communist Party." Manifesto.org. Progress Publishers, 2004. Web. 27 July 2013. Matheis, Christian. "PHIL 1304 - Lecture Notes - Marx & Criticism and Marx & Historical Materialism." Https://scholar.vt.edu/portal/site/2a4ef60f-31dc-4277-ac60-858e046dd6d7/page/ae4944ae-3c3b-44f1-9fce-c8cb0ca5fd2c. Virginia Tech, 14 July 2013. Web. 28 July 2013.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Bibliography: Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels. "Proletarians and Communists." The Communist Manifesto. London: Penguin, 1985. Print.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx: the German philosopher with his works the communist manifesto and capital, provide a bitter critique of capitalism.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Marx, Karl, Friedrich Engels, and Martin Puchner. The Communist Manifesto and Other Writings. New York: Barnes & Noble, 2005. Print.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx, K. H. (1867). Capital. (4 ed., Vol. 1). Chicago: Charles H. Kerr and Co.…

    • 1812 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Is Marxism Anti Democratic

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In order to answer this question the parameters of the discussion must first be set, with key terms in the title defined. Marxism I define to be ‘an economic and socio-political worldview and method of socio-economic enquiry which focuses upon a materialist interpretation of history, a dialectical view of social change and an analysis and critique of capitalism. ‘ Democracy, I define to be an ‘egalitarian form of government in which sovereignty is vested in the people and exercised by them or elected agents.’ In the following essay I will present two opposing interpretations of Marxism, with both leading to wildly divergent conclusions regarding the democratic nature of Marxism. The first perspective revolves around a literal interpretation of Marxism; with the emphasis being entirely on Marx’s writings as oppose to any subsequent interpretations or manifestations of his beliefs. The second perspective involves an empirical study of Marxism, with various Marxist regimes analyzed and the extent to which they are democratic being the primary means of assessing as to whether Marxism is democratic or not. The following two quotations, I believe demonstrate the polarity of opinion existing on Marxism and Democracy and accurately summarize the two perspectives I will be arguing; Hal Draper (1978) states ‘Marx’s socialism maybe most quickly defined, as the complete democratization of society, not merely of political forms,’ and Joseph Femia ‘Communist despotism was a logical consequence of Marxist theory.’ In the first part of the essay, I will outline Marx’s theory of the state and democracy which supports the argument that Marxism is not theoretically anti-democratic. In the second part of the essay I will present the view that as a result of their being such significant empirical evidence in opposition to this thesis I believe it is hard to argue that Marxism can be viewed as democratic. Marx stated ‘The question whether human…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Marx confronted that old “idealistic conception of history” that knew nothing of the classes struggle based upon the material interest, in fact, no material interests at all, and dealt with such topics as production and all economic conditions only accessorily, as “subordinate elements of the history of culture”, with the new principle of the proletarian science and, incidentally, gave the Materialistic Conception of History” its…

    • 4590 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx, K. (1967), Capital: A Critical Analysis of Capitalist Production: The Process of Capitalist Production (New World Paperbacks). International Publishers Co.…

    • 2607 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Matrix Essay

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages

    * Marx, Karl. "The German Ideology." Karl Marx: Selected Writings. Ed. David McLellan. Oxford: Oxford University, 1977. pag168,178. Print.…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx belief of human nature is that it changes over time; it is historical and dynamic. In understanding human nature, it is important to understand what part labour plays in human nature. "To be Human is to labour," (88) therefore Marx believes that Humans work in the world with other Humans in exchange with nature to get what they desire. Thus since human nature is dynamic so are humans' wants and desires. In order to achieve one's wants and desires one must labour with others around them and with nature itself. Since labour is the activity of a group, the ever-changing world created through the labour of those groups also creates the humans themselves and directly affects them. Through labour, humanity creates, and is responsible for the world that they live in. Marx suggests that Capitalism leads to the centralization and concentration of living spaces of where people live, their means of production, monopolies and the distribution of more power to the bourgeoisie. The success of Capitalism is directly connected to capital and wage labour. Capitalism's goal is to increase profits called accumulation; profits then reinvested else where to make more capital. Capitalism flourishes by extracting surplus value, or profit, from the commodities produced by the working class. Without capitals and profits there are obviously no wages and a place to do any…

    • 2112 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx vs. Weber

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages

    capitalist mode of production is the determining factor of an individual’s class position. Marx uses his…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Communist Movement

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “Every form of society has been based, as we have already seen, on the antagonism of oppressing and oppressed classes.”1 It is from this class antagonism that the communist movement tried to break away from. Karl Marx saw the proletariat as the most oppressed class and in his efforts to remedy this, the idea of communism was born. In the beginning it was the feudal lords who owned the land that subjugated the serfs. When the feudal system crumpled and fell it was the bourgeois who picked up the pieces and the capitalist system was created to fill the void. But rather than freeing the serfs from exploitation nothing changed it was only the masters who changed. Capitalism “provided, incontrovertibly, the disastrous effects of machinery and division of labour; the concentration of capital and land in a few hands; over-production and crises; it pointed out the inventible ruin of the petty bourgeois and peasant, the misery of the proletariat, the anarchy in production, the crying inequality in the distribution of wealth, the industrial war of extermination between nations, the dissolution of old moral bonds, of the old family relations, of the old nationalities”2 It was the bourgeois who bought the factories, the printing presses, and the other means of production who in turn subjugated the working class for their own benefit. It is to this aim which communism strived, to take back the means of production for the working class, the proletariat. “All previous historical movements were movements of minorities, or in the interests of minorities. The proletarian movement is the self-conscious, independent movement of the immense majority.”3 This communist movement would have no national identity or interest group it was a movement for the whole proletariat. This movement however could not succeed without a revolution. The bourgeois would never allow this movement to be a peaceful one.…

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Individual and society

    • 2018 Words
    • 9 Pages

    ‘Focuses on the social system as a whole and its functional requirements are normally that of structural sociology’ (Calhoun, C et al 2002) However Marxism a conflict theory of sociology takes exactly this focus when analysing how an individual creates an identity and relationship within society. Marxism as a Macro-theory of sociology focuses on ‘human agents as cogs in the machine of social forces’ (Calhoun, C et al 2002) who have little or no control over the development of their identities, because of the overpowering social superstructure which is dictating a social hierarchy of which they are forced to obey. This large scale view of society as over powering in the formation of one’s identity is not that taken by ‘Micro-sociologist who emphasise the social system as being a human creation, rather than one which is imposed on individuals by the system; thus micro sociologists see social order as being produced from below […] created and maintained by the institutions we actively produce.” (Calhoun, C et al 2002) It is this explanation of micro-sociologists like Mead which give room to theories like his of the symbolic self which belong within the category of action theories; and more closely associated with Symbolic Interactionism.…

    • 2018 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kilcullen, John. "MARX ON CAPITALISM." Division of Humanities. Macquarie University. Web. 28 Feb. 2012. <http://www.humanities.mq.edu.au/Ockham/y64l06.html>.…

    • 4211 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Under capitalism, the proletariat, the working class or “the people,” own only their capacity to work; they have the ability only to sell their own labor. According to Marx a class is defined by the relations of its members to the means of production. He proclaimed that history is the chronology of class struggles, wars, and uprisings. Under capitalism, Marx continues, the workers, in order to support their families are paid a bare minimum…

    • 7979 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theories of Development

    • 2192 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Marx, K., & Friedrich, E. (1983). The Portable Karl Marx. Ed Eugene Kamenka. New York: Penguin Books.…

    • 2192 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays