Preview

Kant’s Moral Rule

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
443 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kant’s Moral Rule
Philosophy 101
Professor D.R. Johnson October 14, 2013

Explain Kant’s Moral Rule: “Only act according to maxims one can rationally will to be Universal”
Immanuel Kant’s “moral rule” is that all actions ought to be done that are required by a moral law. “The starting point for appreciating that there is a distinctive part of our psychology for morality is seeing how moral judgments differ from other kinds of opinions we have on how people ought to behave. Moralization is a psychological state that can be turned on and off like a switch, and when it is on, a distinctive mind-set commandeers our thinking. This is the mind-set that makes us deem actions immoral i.e. (“killing is wrong”), rather than merely disagreeable (“I hate brussels sprouts”), unfashionable (“bell-bottoms are out”) or imprudent (“don’t scratch mosquito bites”)” (NY Times 01/13/08.internet).
Moralization is that the rules it invokes are felt to be universal. Prohibitions of rape and murder, for example, are felt not to be matters of local custom but to be universally and objectively warranted. One can easily say, “I don’t like brussels sprouts, but I don’t care if you eat them,” but no one would say, “I don’t like killing, but I don’t care if you murder someone.”(NY Times 01/13/08.internet). “Kant declares that it is in this manner …we understand Scripture …we are commanded to love our neighbor, even our enemy” (p.101 para 1).
Kant theorizes that moral law applies to everyone and is universally binding. He proclaims that this is a good will which is already present in the person who acts accordingly, and we have not to wait for it to appear first in the result. … He theorizes that it is our moral duty to produce good will through our actions and to only act according to maxims, one can rationally will to be universal (p.102). Kant defines good will as pure rational reason based on moral laws. He advocates compliance - “and suggest this is the condition of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Phil 103 Final

    • 1037 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1A. According to Kant, good will is the only thing that is absolutely good without qualification. Good will is the only thing that is unconditionally good. Good will is what makes all other good things truly good. Things can be good, but not without qualification. The will is good because the intention itself is good, rather than a desired result or some outside reasoning. All in all it is the honest and unselfish intention of a will.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In determining an individual’s will one must understand that the intention behind the action must be moral excluding all inclinations. However, intentions and will, good or bad, play the role in finding the reason for portraying the person’s action. Actions fall into four categories to represent the relation of reason within a good will. If the will of an action is good it must show obedience to the duty. A good will is composed of a concrete good yet the reason utilized in performing actions is responsible for making the good tangible. Acting according to maxims because you must complete your duty in order to achieve good will.…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phil 3033

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages

    For an action to be morally right on Kant’s view it must be the right act done for the right reason.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emmanuel Kant (hereinafter “Kant”) believes that Ethics is categorical and states that our moral duties are not dependent on feelings but on reason. He further states that our moral duties are unconditional, universally valid, and necessary, regardless of the possible consequences or opposition to our inclinations (Pojman and Vaughn 239).…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the most controversial aspects of Kant’s moral philosophy is his theory regarding the concept of duty. Duty is the moral necessity to perform actions for no other reason than to obey the dictates of a higher authority without any selfish inclination. Immanuel Kant states that the only moral motivation is a devotion to duty. The same action can be seen as moral if it is done for the sake of one’s duty but also as not moral (Kant distinguished between immoral and not moral) and simply praise-worthy if it is done out of inclination. Thus, to have moral worth, an action must be done from duty.…

    • 934 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    To act out of respect for the moral law, in Kant’s view, is to be moved to act by moral requirements even when you are not moved by the moral law itself. Morality begins to depreciate when moral acts are done at the convenience of humankind, because the moral self, starts to lose sight of the importance of others, and what is the point of morality if it is not to enrich our own lives by helping…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant philosophy has contributed in development of "pure" moral philosophy, a "metaphysics of morals" that is based on the concepts of reason, not on empirical observations. According to his philosophy moral obligations are applicable to all human beings as it applies not only for particular person in particular situation, but also to all rational beings in all circumstances.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Immanuel Kant states that the only thing in this world that is “good without qualification” is the good will. He states the attributes of character such as intelligence, wit, and judgment are considered good but can be used for the wrong reasons. Kant also states that the attributes of good fortune such as health, power, riches, honor, that provide one happiness can also be used in the wrong way (7). In order to understand Kant’s view of moral rightness, one must understand that only a good will is unambiguously good without qualification, it is “good in itself”. To clarify, Kant states that “a good will is good not because of what it effects or accomplishes, nor because of its fitness to attain some proposed end; it is good only through its willing, i.e. it is good in itself” (7). To Kant, a good will is the only thing that gives action moral worth. Human beings were granted with reason not only to attain self-preservation and a state of happiness, but “its true function must be to produce a will which is not merely good as a mean to some further end, but it good in itself” (9). Human beings are called to exercise reason through duty to bring a universal good to all. This duty, living according to our highest reason, must be exercised through action that is beneficial and non-contradictory to all. Duty has three major qualifications for Kant. One must recognize that duty is good in itself when an action is performed out of the need of the completion of the duty itself, such as one who abstains from supporting a large restaurant corporation that inhumanely raise cattle or poultry, because he or she recognizes that it is a duty to not perpetuate unethical practice. Or one who carefully recycles their waste not because of the pleasure of being an enlightened “green” individual, but because of the recognition that it is “good in itself” to reuse products. The second…

    • 2304 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this paper I will examine the practicality and applicability of Kantian moral law in comparison to the golden rule. The main focus will be with on categorical imperatives, hypothetical imperatives, duty, and good will when it comes to Kantian moral law. Then, with the golden rule the focus will be on the whole maxim, “do unto others as you would have them do unto you”, since it is quite simple. To help with the analysis of these two topics the examples of the death penalty and charity will be employed. I will use them to demonstrate the differences and similarities between the two ideas. My main argument is that while the Kantian moral law is obviously of a higher ethical standard than that of the golden rule it is not realistic or practical.…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the nonconsequentialist approach proposed by the German philosopher, Immanuel Kant, an action has moral worth if and if only, it stems from a sense of duty. Kantian ethics do not account for contingencies and possible consequences of actions. Moreover, the moral principles behind the actions must have universal applicability. In other words, it must be binding on all rational beings, irrespective of their personal desires and objectives. Another important dimension of Kant’s ethics disregards the treatment of humanity as a means to an end. Thus, Kant proposes that moral actions involve respecting humanity, both within and outside us (Shaw,…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They command you to do X, whether or not you have the desire to do X. We must act in such a way that allows us to treat humanity as an end and never merely as a means. From this exposition, Kant argues that morality should not be something that differs from individual to individual; because we are rational human beings, we ought to give reasons for what we do, and we can act based on those reasons rather than acting simply because we want to. We should act, regardless of our own purposes, only on maxims (general ways of acting). For example, every human being should have the intention to act the same way another human being would in a moral dilemma.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kant's Groundwork

    • 2358 Words
    • 10 Pages

    To start off, a brief explanation of the ‘will’ seems important to understand the concept of a ‘good will’ that is first presented by Kant. A will carries intention to perform an action. When the will is free, it is free to act without regards to inclinations. When the will is good, a ‘good will,’ it makes a commitment to do what is right in any case, free from inclinations, in accordance with duty (duty will be discussed later). Kant starts off Section I of the Groundwork saying, ‘There is nothing that is possible to think of anywhere in the world, indeed even outside it, that can be held to be good without restriction except a good will.’ Here, Kant introduces the ‘good will’ and starts the foundation upon where the rest of Section I will follow. This statement suggests that anything seen as good,…

    • 2358 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Every ethical theory has its distinct perspective or view on what is morally correct or incorrect. Each theory has its defect, imperfection, and rebuttal. The moral principles described in this paper include Utilitarianism, Kant's Duty Defined Morality, Aristotle’s Virtue Ethics, The Divine Command Theory, and Natural Law Theory. This paper argues that Kant's Duty Defined Morality is better than the other ethical principles. Kant's theory is not a consequential theory; thus the theory focuses on the action at hand and the duty one should commit because it is their job to. Kant’s Defined Morality judges the action itself, and is the most reasonable therefore; it is the best ethical theory and the most…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kant's Moral Equation

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Immanuel Kant's moral theory can be best explained by comparing it to a math equation. Kant's moral system will always hold true no matter what the circumstance just like how two plus two will always equal four. According to Kant, our lives should be lived according to maxims that can be willed into universal law (Kant, Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals, p 303). However the action regarding a moral decision is not judged by the consequences of that action, rather by the motive of that action.…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first formulation of Kant’s categorical imperative states that one should only act on reasons we would be willing to have anyone in a similar situation act on. This formulation requires universalizability and reversibility. On the other hand, the second formulation states that one should never use people only as a means to your ends. We must always treat others as they freely and rationally consent to be treated. Under this formulation it is also stated that we must help others pursue their freely and rationally chosen ends.…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics