Preview

Kant's Rational Capacity

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
361 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kant's Rational Capacity
The moral worth of animals and non-person humans, as per Immanuel Kant’s differentiation of regular, rational humans with those who have mental “incapacities,” has been a long debate in ethics. If we were able to prove that animals and non-person humans have rational capacity, although different compared to persons, then these non-person beings might be given moral rights.
Since humans usually use the supposedly unique rational capacity to justify their dominion over the other beings, then proving the rationality of non-person humans and animals could result to gaining basic respect for them from the moral community. This respect could include respecting the animals’ situations and letting them live in their own habitat instead of humans
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Peter Singer's Argumentative Essay: The Rights Of Animals
    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Peter Singer's Argumentative Essay: The Rights Of Animals

    Animals deserve rights because just like humans, they feel excruciating pain, suffer and have feelings. One would argue that animals don’t experience emotions? But the answer is of course they do. It is emotions that allow animals to display various behavior patterns. According to the theory of utilitarianism, all sentient beings should be given consideration in the society and this includes both animals and humans. Also, animals cannot speak for themselves and for this reason they should be treated equally, protected and given the same respect as human beings. Peter singer’s approach also supports the argument on equal consideration in that animals deserve the same respect as human beings but just in a different view. In today’s society humans exploit animals for milk, meat, fur, scientific experimentation etc. and animals are constantly injured or killed. Their pain and sufferings should be taken into consideration, as this unjust treatment is morally unacceptable. Similarly speciesism is an…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Tom Regan Animal Rights Summary
    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Tom Regan Animal Rights Summary

    Determining the rights of non-human animals and deciding how to treat them may not be a choice available to our human society. As an advocate for the rights of animals, Tom Reganʻs three main goals are to abandon the use of animals in any scientific research, discontinue all commercial animal agriculture, and to completely terminate both commercial and sport animal hunting. To support these intentions, Regan argues that every human and non-human animal possesses inherent value, which makes them all more than a physical object or vessel. He then states that possessing inherent value allows every human and non-human to have rights of their own. To further his argument, Regan claims that the any human and non-human retaining rights requires equal treatment and respect from others. To conclude his argument, Regan states that due to these reasons, non-human animals cannot be treated as resources and must be treated by humans as equals. In this paper, I object to Reganʻs third premise, which states that non-human and human animals must be treated as equals and with respect, because our communication barrier with non-human animals restricts us from determining their notion of equal treatment or respect, and that attempting to do so could…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Brief Summary Of The Article 'A Change Of Heart About Animals'
    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Brief Summary Of The Article 'A Change Of Heart About Animals'

    Animals and humans were created to coexist on this earth and therefore should receive fair treatment. Many cannot fathom the idea of initiating legal rights for animals. Some may even perceive it as absurd to dedicate and focus time on non-human animals. The main problem is that humans have advanced significantly, establishing a complex intellect that other species lack. Humans possess many capabilities that are distinct from those of others.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    abc at abc
    • 3544 Words
    • 10 Pages

    abc at abc

    One day as I sat in the living room, watching the news on TV, there was a story about some demonstration by animal rights activists. I found myself agreeing with them to a greater extent than I normally do. While pondering why I found their position more appealing than usual that evening, I noted that I was also in a rather misanthropic mood that day. That suggested to me that there might be an association between misanthropy and support for animal rights. When evaluating the ethical status of an action that does some harm to a nonhuman animal, I generally do a cost/benefit analysis, weighing the benefit to humankind against the cost of harm done to the nonhuman. When doing such an analysis, if one does not think much of humankind (is misanthropic), e is unlikely to be able to justify harming nonhumans. To the extent that one does not like humans, one will not be likely to think that benefits to humans can justify doing harm to nonhumans. I decided to investigate the relationship between misanthropy and support of animal rights.…

    • 3544 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ivf Pros And Cons
    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ivf Pros And Cons

    “autonomous persons have intrinsic worth bc they have the power to make rational decisions and moral choices and should therefore be respected” (Vaughn, 2013).…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Lisa Kemmerer's Arguement Of Animal Rights
    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Lisa Kemmerer's Arguement Of Animal Rights

    Animals contribute in many ways to our world. We seem to take for granted the benefits animals can have on us. The benefits animals have on our earth shouldn’t be taken for granted. Without animals, our earth would not receive the essential nutrients it needs to flourish. Establishing animal rights will give animals the love and respect that they’ve always deserved. Animal are not pieces of meat, they are a vital resource to the nutriment of our earth. We have been given the power to protect animals and give them rights of their own. We should not ignore the needs of animals. Animals have benefited us in ways no human can. It is our moral duty as humans to take a stand for animals and give them the rights they deserve. At this very moment animals are being abused and carelessly slaughtered. Now is the time to end the abuse of animals and give them the rights that benefits us…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Tom Regan The Case For Animal Rights
    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Tom Regan The Case For Animal Rights

    Although humans do have empathy for animals, animal inequality still remains and this is due to speciesism. In the ‘Equality for Animals?’, Peter Singer defines a speciesist as “anyone who gives greater weight to the interest of her own species than to the interests of other species, just as a racist is one who gives greater weight to the interest of her own race.” (Singer) Since animals lack the capacity for language and abstract reasoning, they cannot voice their terms of equality and this inherently allows discrimination to thrive. But the equality of animals should not depend on the intelligence or moral capacity of animals, but instead, depending on the intelligence and moral capacity of human…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Peter Singer Logic
    • 1339 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Peter Singer Logic

    For example, someone with severe cognitive paralysis may be less rational or “able” than a normal-functioning dolphin. Thus, Singer points out that if we wish to establish equality based upon attributes, we have a hard time excluding many species of non-humans. As a corollary, the standard of equality by a typical set of characteristics must be set lower and lower to encompass all humans when we consider those with severe disabilities. In other words, writes Singer, “the philosopher comes up against the catch that any such set of characteristics which covers all humans will not be possessed only by humans.”…

    • 1339 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Speciesism And Moral Status Peter Singer Summary
    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Speciesism And Moral Status Peter Singer Summary

    In his work Speciesism and Moral Status, Peter Singer compares the behaviors of humans with cognitive disabilities to the behaviors of nonhuman animals. He argues that all human beings do not have cognitive abilities that exceed that of all nonhuman animals. In fact, many nonhuman animals have cognitive abilities that surpass the cognitive abilities of human beings with severe mental retardation. Through his argument, he questions the ethical significance of the idea that all human beings have a certain kind of moral status. Singer explores the issue of moral status through religious, speciesist and cognitive grounds in order to propose that human beings must…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kant's Perspective on Lying
    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Kant's Perspective on Lying

    Kant believes humans have the highest value in the realm of existence because they are the only beings capable of reasoning. He extends this theory to say that humans have the right to use other creatures in any way they see fit as long as they are serving an end to justify the means. Kant perceives humans as the most valuable creatures because other “animals” are not able to have desires and set personal goals. Modern science invalidates some of Kant’s views because some animals do in fact have the mental capacity to express desire (however Kant was not aware of this). He thought that humans are entitled to respect each other and allow each other to act freely, utilizing the special tool of rational thinking that he believes is unique to the species.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Argumentative Essay: The Issue Of Granting Animal Rights
    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Argumentative Essay: The Issue Of Granting Animal Rights

    Animals from creation have been an essential integral part of human beings. They have frequently been, either directly or indirectly, used by humans to achieve their needs. Hence they are important part and great asset to humans. These animals do have lives different from that of humans and equally have some similar characteristics with humans like emotional feelings. This very fact puts humans in a difficult position of determining the amount of respect and regard that should be accorded to the animals. Some people agitate that animals should be granted same equal rights as human beings. Inasmuch as I quite agree that animals should be granted some rights in order to be free from cruel treatments by humans, the issue of granting them equal full rights as enjoyed by humans should not come up. An objective review of such factors as tradition, cultural believes, religious, socio-economic, and medical as well as salient natural features that distinguish animals from humans like morality, and ability to…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Defining the Moral Status
    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Defining the Moral Status

    How do you determine who has a higher moral status. What properties should you base your criteria on? We will isolate and divulge on the significant properties that present guidelines on how to address the moral rights of vulnerable groups. Some examples are human embryos, fetus, research test animals, adults in mentally compromised state. There are five theories suggested by Beauchamp and Childress to help present a plausible perspective on an adequate moral status position. There is human, cognitive, moral agency, sentience, and relationship theory.…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Immanuel Kant On Human Nature
    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Immanuel Kant On Human Nature

    Through his exploration and definition of nature, Kant asserted that autonomy was a necessity which a creature must maintain in order to conceive a moral assessment of actions. This state of existence, he believed, was a capacity that is unique to mankind. Essentially, autonomy is what separates us from the animal kingdom. Kant validates this hypothesis by explaining that human wills are affected but not determined by bodily desires. Therefore, human wills are then placed between non-rational animals (whose wills are determined by bodily desires) and divine beings (whose wills are determined by reason). Simply stated, human beings possessed a rational intuition that animals lacked and divine beings mastered.…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animals Should Be Treated Wih the Same Respect as Humans
    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Animals Should Be Treated Wih the Same Respect as Humans

    It is a common belief that a human is superior to any other animal, mainly because of the extended intelligence that the former is gifted with. However, it is my strong conviction that all living things are worthy of the same respect and deserve to be treated with the same consideration.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Characteristics of a Person
    • 2110 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Characteristics of a Person

    The ability to reason is seen as being one of the defining characteristics of personhood. Rationality can be summarised in our ability to make considered choices and decisions at a higher intellectual level. Rationality is illustrated in our ability to justify our thoughts and actions through reason, scaled to emotional or practical variables. Aristotle considered that the thought-processes that precede our actions are pivotal to personhood. Such thought-processes generally involve evaluating the positive and negative consequences of our actions, and deciding whether the ‘reward’ is worth the ‘cost’. This ability to predict consequences of our actions isn’t shared by the lower animals, and is pivotal in making the distinction between a person and a non-person. We have the ability to justify our beliefs and actions and to enter into reasoned dialogue with others. Rationality also leads to the ability to evaluate experience and draw logical, considered conclusions which will influence our actions in the future.…

    • 2110 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics