Preview

Kant's Categorical Imperative Examples

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
805 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kant's Categorical Imperative Examples
1. “The imperative thus says which action possible by me would be good, and represents the practical rule in relation to a will that does not at once do an action just because it is good, party because the subject does not always know that it is good, party because, even if he knew this, his maxims could still be opposed to the objective principles of practical reason” (4:414). Kant’s categorical imperative states that our actions should be in accord with universal good and not driven by any personal motive or desire. Such an imperative is driven by the idea that intention is the main driving force behind the morality of an action and is all that matters. The outcome has no bearing on the good of an action since the basis of the action can …show more content…
“And this categorical imperatives are possible, because of the idea of freedom makes me a member of an intelligible world, in which virtue of which, if I were alone, all my actions would always conform with the autonomy of the will, but as at the same time I intuit myself as a member of the world of sense, they ought to conform with it… (4:454). Kant explains how freedom is a moral necessity since our actions must come from our own free will without external forces persuading the action. All human beings have the ability through free will to make decisions that are moral in both their intent and outcome. “All human beings think of themselves as having a will that is free. From this stem all judgments about actions such that they ought to have been done even if they were not done” (4:455). An action cannot be deemed good without freedom. Freedom is a requirement for good will because our actions are deliberated through reason. “But the legitimate claim even of common human reason to freedom of the will is founded on the consciousness and the granted presupposition of the independence of reason from merely subjectively determining causes, which together one and all constitute what merely belongs to sensation, and hence under the general label of sensibility” (4:457). Kant explains that since we have free will, through of general sensibility, we are able to utilize practical reason to make decisions in accord with goodwill. This freedom is therefore self legislated towards a universal law that constituted the good will we are all meant to abide

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Good And Evil Casablanca

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He believed that our actions must come from a sense of Duty, not because we care for or love one another but because it is our Duty to “respect the Moral Law” (p. 246). Judging the importance of a decision based on whether or not it was following a rule or set of rules is called deontological ethics. He believed that it was not the consequences of the action which were important but the person’s motive carrying out the said action. Many disagree with Kant saying that we must have a foundation to start from, a reason such as love or concern to do what is morally…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant writes about two formulations of his categorical imperative, the first being Universal law. The formulation of Universal Law is the basis of Categorical Imperative. It states that “Act only on that maxim [principal rule of conduct] whereby you can at the same time will that it would become a universal law” (Pojman and Vaughn 239). Universal law suggests that the maxim is an objective and universal…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The categorical imperative is a way of testing possible actions. The maxim of universality is as follows : Act so that the totality of maxims from which you act are such that you can regard yourself as enacting through these maxims a unified scheme of public moral perceptions , the enforcing of which by all reasonable and rational persons . According to Kant, the correct way to think about ones actions are to contemplate whether or not one would like that action to happen to you. In other words, one should use the idea of the golden rule. He thinks that humanity should use this type of guideline, so that humans do not give into their natural ways, and see it in less personal terms.…

    • 2197 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant And Utilitarianism

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to Kant, he believes that the only thing unconditionally good is good will. Good will is the idea of people having to do ones moral duty. Kant’s ethical theories are based off of the categorical imperatives. Categorical imperatives, as stated during class, act only on those rules that you can rationally will to be universal. In response to Kant’s theory, I believe that good will is not the only thing that is unconditionally good. I believe this because there will be many instances in life where having a good will can lead to tragic situations.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They command you to do X, whether or not you have the desire to do X. We must act in such a way that allows us to treat humanity as an end and never merely as a means. From this exposition, Kant argues that morality should not be something that differs from individual to individual; because we are rational human beings, we ought to give reasons for what we do, and we can act based on those reasons rather than acting simply because we want to. We should act, regardless of our own purposes, only on maxims (general ways of acting). For example, every human being should have the intention to act the same way another human being would in a moral dilemma.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Our will, through our own choosing, is good when it operates from reason and duty alone. In this way, the Categorical Imperative guides us to being truly moral. Further, freedom is the ability to be motivated by your own choices, and to be able to deliberate and act on reason. So why be moral? Because it is a pure extension of our autonomy – and there is nothing greater than freedom.…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The second suggestion is that an activity has moral worth not as a result of its point, but rather due to the adage on which it is based. In this way, it wouldn't make any difference if the plan fizzled or exploded backward, as the guideline was great. Will is between guideline from the earlier and motivation a posteriori, and since Kant has stripped the will of its impetuses, the integrity of a demonstration should essentially be in the rule. The third recommendation, is that "obligation is the need of an activity from regard for the law". Since an activity in agreement from obligation must be stripped of all goals, then what is left is the simply objective, which is the law. In this manner, law must be all inclusive, and one ought to never act with the exception of that his activity could be made an all inclusive law. Kant then uses the case of a man in a tight spot misleading maintain a strategic distance from shame. In spite of the fact that he could will the lie, he couldn't will the adage to lie, as the all inclusive law would obliterate guarantees and law would "wreck itself." This gives us the general standard of the regular understanding, which would serve as a worthy compass for good conduct, yet it could in any case be adulterated by the human longing for joy, which would attempt to acquire these laws nearer agreement to our…

    • 1609 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant believed in the ultimate good and fundamental rationality of humans. This formed the categorical imperative which decides if a decision is good or bad. If a decision can be applied universally and still be possible, it is likely rational. Otherwise the maxim will result in either a contradiction in conception resulting in a perfect duty or a contradiction in will or imperfect duty. Kant also believed that performing a good action for non-rational reasons is not morally good and rational decisions with consequences we cannot be held accountable for as it is outside of…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant’s Categorical Imperative is made up of two formulations, Formula of Universal Law and The Formula of the End in Itself. The first formulation is best described by the following statement, “Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law without contradiction.” (Kant, 1785, 1993). What does this mean? A maxim is the fundamental rule of conduct or your moral belief upon which you chose to act. A universal law is a law that everyone must follow regardless of the outcome.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If we explain briefly Kant's categorical imperative, there are basically three principles that represent it. These are universal law, ends as a means and the importance of intention in conducting of human behaviour. Firstly, according to Kant, one's action should be universally valid. Universal validity means that people should think behaviours and they need to judge their own behaviours or actions are morally acceptable or not. When you think of your behaviour, if you decide that everyone acts in the same way with me, then the action become universal and moral. The second principle of categorical imperative is that people must respect others and…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kant's first formulation of the categorical imperative involves, in abbreviation, the maxim of your action; maxim is the reason we're doing the actions. Maxim is the most important word in Kant's quote about categorical imperatives because it describes the intention behind our action. An example of this first imperative is "Because I am hungry, I am going to get something to eat." Kant thinks that all of our actions have maxims, because these guides, guide our behavior. Act as if the maxim you are following will be followed by everyone! The question here is what would happen if everyone followed your maxim.…

    • 184 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant on Will

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant’s argument that an act out of duty can not be in conflict with itself or with any other will acting out of duty derives from the concept he puts forth of the internal principle. A will cannot conflict itself if it determines itself a priori. By determining its morals before the benefit of experience, it determines itself simply that it exists as it is. Intuitively, anything pure cannot conflict with itself just as the idea of good cannot conflict with itself and be somehow partly bad (437). Thus by simply being, without any other influence determining it, the will is an end in itself (437). A will acting out of duty, or in other words on its own internal principles, can not conflict with another will simply because it does not depend on the other will. In order to conflict, something must first interact. And if two wills are acting in accordance with duty, then they each recognize each other as an end in itself, and therefore do not interact on the level of morality (438). Just as a self-sufficient village with no roads leading to or from can not conflict with another village simply because it needs not and cannot interact, a self-sufficient will, and therefore determined with no external influence, can also not conflict with anther will acting out of duty. Though if something is not self-sufficient, it requires another object to fulfill its ends. As with the village, if it needs to conquer a neighboring village’s farmland in order to feed itself, conflict arises. Similarly, should a will not be determined a priori, but instead based on external circumstances, then a will must use another will to fulfill its needs, and therefore would conflict with the autonomy of the second…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kant is saying your actions, based on good will, can apply to all; so that good moral judgments made can become universal for everyone. Kant believed a person’s motive, his intentions of an action are what decides if the action is morally right or wrong—not the end result of that action or decision. Kant’s categorical imperative approach says a person has the moral duty to do what is right, because it is the right thing to do, not because it may benefit them. If a person’s actions or decisions will contradict those maxims, then the action should not be taken.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first formulation of the Categorical Imperative is defined by Kant to "act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law". Good moral actions are those of which are…

    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The binding trait between Kant's first and second Categorical Imperatives is the element of reason. Both reinforce Kant's opinion that people have a duty to respect rational thinking. In the first formulation, Kant instructs people to use reason for the purpose of determining if an action is moral by the standard of it being good for everyone, or if it should be applied as a universal moral law. Kant believes it is critical to determine moral laws without the consideration of the goals or outcomes…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays