Under both formations whether Jean’s action, saving his nephew by using his network ID and knowledge of LM Pharmacy’s security system, is morally wrong or right. If we apply the first Categorical Imperative to analyze Jean’s action, he violated universal moral law, deceiving others. He deceived the island pharmacist. When we universalize deceiving others to escape difficult situations, we find that deceiving is not universally acceptable. Hoewer, Jean was willing that everybody can device others. Then if that were the reality, it will be hard to believe anyone since deceiving is universalized and even the island pharmacy wouldn’t have allowed Jean to get the medication so that Jean could not escape from the situation, the frustration that he might lose his nephew. On the other hand, If we apply the second categorical imperative, Jean violated it, because he used the pharmacist as a means to satisfy his goal, saving his nephew, rather than treating him as a rational
Under both formations whether Jean’s action, saving his nephew by using his network ID and knowledge of LM Pharmacy’s security system, is morally wrong or right. If we apply the first Categorical Imperative to analyze Jean’s action, he violated universal moral law, deceiving others. He deceived the island pharmacist. When we universalize deceiving others to escape difficult situations, we find that deceiving is not universally acceptable. Hoewer, Jean was willing that everybody can device others. Then if that were the reality, it will be hard to believe anyone since deceiving is universalized and even the island pharmacy wouldn’t have allowed Jean to get the medication so that Jean could not escape from the situation, the frustration that he might lose his nephew. On the other hand, If we apply the second categorical imperative, Jean violated it, because he used the pharmacist as a means to satisfy his goal, saving his nephew, rather than treating him as a rational