Preview

Kant's Antinomies

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
126 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kant's Antinomies
Page 6 of 13, Naragon, "Kant's Revolution of the Mind"
In the Critique of Pure Reason, Kant presented four very different types of antinomies: the world consisting of indivisible elements, freedom casualty existing, and a necessary being that caused the world. The fourth one stuck out the most. As a very confused individual about religion and the uncertainty about it, the fourth antinomy stuck out the most.The thought of there being an absolutely necessary being (such as God) in the causal chain of beings has been discussed throughout the entire course of history. The statement is whether we can suppose the existence of a God as the being which necessarily exists. The possibility is there that a necessary being could exist, but how probable
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Evaluate Anselm's Ontological Argument Analysis
    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Evaluate Anselm's Ontological Argument Analysis

    The answer has to be ‘A God who cannot be thought of as not existing’. So that, Anselm argued in his book Proslogion, proves logically that God’s existence is necessary. “There is no doubt that there exists a being than which nothing greater can be conceived”, this is simply saying that no one can think of anything greater than God and therefore God is the greatest possible…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Does God Exist? Considering the Philosophy of Ernest Nagel from a First Person
    • 1537 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Does God Exist? Considering the Philosophy of Ernest Nagel from a First Person

    One burning and enduring problem in philosophy to which we have given considerable examination is the question of the existence of God--the superlative being that philosophers have defined and dealt with for centuries. After reading the classic arguments of St. Anselm and St. Thomas Aquinas, the contentious assertions of Ernest Nagel, and the compelling eyewitness accounts of Julian of Norwich, I have been introduced to some of the most revered and referenced arguments for and against God's existence that have been put into text. All of them are well-thought and well-articulated arguments, but they have their holes. The question of God's true existence, therefore, is still not definitively answered and put to rest; the intensity of this debate probably never will mitigate. Many theologians and academics honestly admit that no matter what any philosopher may assert regarding this topic, whether or not a certain person believes in God's existence is a question of faith and nothing more.…

    • 1537 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Response To Mccloskey's 'On Being An Atheist'
    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Response To Mccloskey's 'On Being An Atheist'

    McCloskey claims that the “mere existence of the world constitutes no reason for believing in such a being.” He goes on to state that because there are beings in the universe that do not have any explanation for their existence, one can infer that there must be some “ultimate” being responsible. The original cause of being is necessary because contingency cannot be infinite. The cosmological argument is the basis for why we may question the existence of anything, but it is not a sufficient enough answer to the bigger question of an all-powerful ultimate…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant's Ethical Summary
    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Immanuel Kant's Ethical Summary

    There is an old saying that it is better to be lucky than good. This may be true if a person is always lucky, but luck sometimes has a tendency to run out. Making decisions that affect other people’s lives based on luck can be sometimes dangerous, and usually ethically questionable. Leaders who routinely depend on luck for success may find themselves relying on other questionable actions, such as lying, cheating, or stealing, to ensure luck stays on their side. Additionally, this type of behavior may force subordinates to make ethically questionable decisions when luck begins to run out.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    to what extent is the cosmological argument a weak argument
    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages

    to what extent is the cosmological argument a weak argument

    All expect the contingency theory, another argument by Thomas Aquinas. This argument states that everything in our universe is contingent (does not have to necessarily exist) so if everything was contingent then at some time there would have been nothing and therefore there would be nothing, but there clearly is, so therefore there must be something which isn’t contingent which everything else depends on, a necessary being, this is God.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant Deontological System Essay
    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Immanuel Kant Deontological System Essay

    On the four deontological systems that we have discussed, I would like to share my thoughts about the Kantian Deontological System. Kantian Ethics is formulated by Immanuel Kant in which he discussed that the nature of duty is based on human reason. For him, human reason, not human nature, can determine what is right and wrong. He also stressed that human desires are not the right measurement for ethics. In addition, Kantian Ethics is known for its two kinds of command or imperative: the hypothetical and categorical imperative. According to Immanuel Kant, hypothetical imperative has conditions and has no value. We do a certain action or decision because we are waiting for something in return or because we are afraid of punishment. On the other…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kant and the Horseman in the Sky
    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant and the Horseman in the Sky

    I believe that Immanuel Kant would see Carter Druse's action of shooting his father as moral. Kant was an ethicist that believed that morality was based on duty, that ethics is absolute, not conditional, and is based on reason, not feelings. (Pojman, Vaughn 309)…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Great Philosopher: Immanuel Kant
    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Great Philosopher: Immanuel Kant

    Immanuel Kant is recognized as the greatest philosopher since Plato and Aristotle (Wolff). He is most widely known for his work in the fields of metaphysics and epistemology (McCormick). Kant published many works regarding his epistemological views, but his most famous work is The Critique of Pure Reason (McCormick). He noted that Descartes had “simply accepted consciousness as an…inexplicable fact” (Wolff). Kant utilized this observation to refute Descartes’ famous quote, “I think, therefore I am,” with a slightly revised premise— “I am conscious” (Wolff).…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Kant's Categorical Imperative
    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant's Categorical Imperative

    Emmanuel Kant (hereinafter “Kant”) believes that Ethics is categorical and states that our moral duties are not dependent on feelings but on reason. He further states that our moral duties are unconditional, universally valid, and necessary, regardless of the possible consequences or opposition to our inclinations (Pojman and Vaughn 239).…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kant Paper 2

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant Paper 2

    maxim and why you could not achieve the purpose or end of the maxim in…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Emmanuel Kant Analysis
    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Emmanuel Kant Analysis

    Emmanuel Kant argues that the human understanding of our world is perceived by our experiences and only through them can we gain knowledge. Kant’s philosophic question is rooted in the theory of understanding; in short, what can we know and how can we know it? Most of our knowledge of the world can be derived from our observation of it. As children, we see things, touch things, smell things and so on. Gradually, we understand the world in which we live in; this is the knowledge of sense-perception. For example, wind has no physical form but we can see its effects and can classify it as being part of nature. Kant, however, perceives knowledge only through our experiences. So going back to the example of wind, Kant would say we have knowledge of wind not because we…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Arguments Against The Cosmological Argument
    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Arguments Against The Cosmological Argument

    However, this argument is illogical, as there is no need to go further back to find a necessary cause. Moreover, the suggestion that God must be this ‘necessary being’ seems to be too easy of a conclusion – why, without any reasoning, has God been decided as the one being that does not need a cause of its own? It seems rather a dogmatic assumption that God is the only necessary being, when, logically, many other things could be…

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant Analysis
    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Immanuel Kant Analysis

    Immanuel Kant is a philosopher that has always stuck out because the way he approaches morality is particularly different than most other philosopher. Some would say that Kant’s philosophy works satisfactorily in a perfect world, but fails to account for how the world actually is, which is far from perfect. Even if this is true the groundwork of Kant’s work has still garnered the admiration of many philosophers that were during and after his time.…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant Ticking Time Bomb
    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Immanuel Kant Ticking Time Bomb

    Immanuel Kant lived during a time period where the French enlightenment took place. The enlightenment is referred to as the age of reason. This was a time in which people wanted to throw off traditions and religion because they questioned the tradition authority. They were trying to eliminate them from having any influence in the decision-making processes. What they deemed to be superstition in favor of pure reason the notion was that reason if guided properly would lead us humanity to the truth. Kant's theory is based solely on the duty of ones action, whether one chooses to be good or not; their consequence does not matter. I believe the Kantian theory would be an interesting and effective way to analyze the “Ticking Time Bomb” case by…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Similarities Between Kant And Antigone
    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Similarities Between Kant And Antigone

    When presented with situations whose outcomes reflect that of a Catch-22, exactly how does one know which repercussion is more favorable, or the least detrimental? In the circumstance of the trolley, mothers, and children, both decisions can be determined “the morally correct decision” depending on the philosophies behind them. In this paper, I will compare Mill’s, Kant’s and Antigone’s perspectives in order to determine their position in the trolley situation.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics