161). Someone who following the amoralist path is a person who is completed aware of if something is good and if something is bad, but when it comes to if is morally acceptable then they are willing to blur the line. Kant used the example of a serial killer who is aware of what is right or wrong but have no issues with that fact that their actions are morally wrong (Landau, 2010, p. 161). While DiCenso was comparing Kant to Freud he has an interesting view, “Kant establishes an intrinsic connection between ethics and autonomy, understood as freely following the categorical imperative without consideration of external circumstances.” (DiCenso, 2007, p. 167). The external circumstances would be similar the serial killer example that was talked about early, because someone could full understand what it is they are doing, but in some cases an external circumstance is what will drive the
161). Someone who following the amoralist path is a person who is completed aware of if something is good and if something is bad, but when it comes to if is morally acceptable then they are willing to blur the line. Kant used the example of a serial killer who is aware of what is right or wrong but have no issues with that fact that their actions are morally wrong (Landau, 2010, p. 161). While DiCenso was comparing Kant to Freud he has an interesting view, “Kant establishes an intrinsic connection between ethics and autonomy, understood as freely following the categorical imperative without consideration of external circumstances.” (DiCenso, 2007, p. 167). The external circumstances would be similar the serial killer example that was talked about early, because someone could full understand what it is they are doing, but in some cases an external circumstance is what will drive the