Preview

Kantian Ethics Research Paper

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2198 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kantian Ethics Research Paper
Kantian Ethics

The relationship between society and an individual is as though between an object and its shadow. No one individual can function apart from society, nor can society operate without the support of individuals. Society, as we know, is the umbrella term for the collection of humans working as a community and sharing common ideals with regards to actions, ethics, and morals. The foundation of a society is always going to be the individuals that make it up. When the individuals in a society are all just and moral people, then society naturally would work as a just and moral entity. Therefore, the implications of peoples’ ideals, intentions, and actions dictate the conventions of that society. However, the notions of morality
…show more content…
We can easily prove the thought process that one experiences before carrying out any action. A moral compass for each member in society is created through their exchanges with others and their environment. This moral compass is used to evaluate the action we are about to take. Furthermore, this moral compass is what creates a distinction between intentions and actions. There are numerous arguments that can be created regarding intention and action. However, I personally feel as though regardless of the outcome, the intent to which we carry out an action is what should be considered when debating the morality and righteousness of an action. The idea that intent is more important that the action itself aligns with Immanuel Kant’s understanding of morality. Immanuel Kant is an 18th century German philosopher who wrote numerous essays arguing that reason should be the groundwork for establishing any idea of morality. In his work, “Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals” he contents that intentions overpower actions. Kant explains the notion of a moral compass through his idea of a categorical imperative. The categorical imperatives according to Kant are principles that can be universally accepted as they do only good and no harm. By saying that they are good, they are morally just in the sense that the imperatives take into account the laws of nature. In other words, these imperatives understand the guidelines to the way in which the …show more content…
Koorsgaard ultimately agrees with Kant and simply extends those ideals to the treatment of animals. After evaluating both sides, I feel as though the debate between extending the Kantian ideals to the treatment of animals depends on what defines a rational animal and where the distinction between humans and animals come from based off the interactions between humans and animals. It is evident that humans have a rationale mindset. We have the ability to think as well as the ability to communicate our thoughts. Humans experience emotion. We feel love, pain, sadness, and even numbness. Studies have observed animals feeling similar emotions, however their inability to communicate will never validate this claim. As humans, we also function within a society. We have duties and obligations to our society; hence the need to abide by a categorical imperative becomes pivotal. We are the most interactive and interconnected species on our planet. If the interactions between humans and other humans are governed by morals and principles, then there should be some sort of moral governance when humans and animals are

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Kant’s deontological moral theory states that actions that are morally right from the motive must derive from duty rather than desires (Kemerling). The ultimate principle of morality must be a moral law that guides us in the right direction in any circumstances (Kemerling). According to Kant, although everything naturally occurs in accordance to law, the element of subjectiveness in humans may contradict the natural law, this results in obligation which results in an imperative reaction (Kemerling). There are two types of imperatives. Firstly, is hypothetical imperative which demands a particular action to be taken in order to achieve a particular result, where we are sure of the result when it comes to ethical decisions(Kemerling). Second is a categorical imperative which demands an action for its sake alone, which results in many unfamiliar problems (Kemerling). Kant introduced an alternative formulae for the categorical imperative which is the “formula of the end in itself” and the “formula of autonomy” (Kemerling). The formula of the end in itself simply meant that humanity is always treated as an end and not as a mean(Kemerling). The formula of autonomy, on the other hand, means the decision to act according to a maxim is actually regarded as an universal law…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to Kant’s theory on the good will of people states that actions are only moral judged by the motivations of those actions. Relate to article…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kantian Ethics Case Study

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this paper, I will explain Kantian ethics and its application, by utilizing the surgeon and six patients scenario. The surgeon has five patients who are in need of an organ transplant, and without a transplant, they will all die within a day. Another patient, who is a perfect match for all the other five patients, refuses to donate his organs to the other five patients. Thus, the surgeon is presented with two different paths, whether to go against the healthy patient's refusal and save the lives of the other five patients or to let the other five patients die.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Animals from creation have been an essential integral part of human beings. They have frequently been, either directly or indirectly, used by humans to achieve their needs. Hence they are important part and great asset to humans. These animals do have lives different from that of humans and equally have some similar characteristics with humans like emotional feelings. This very fact puts humans in a difficult position of determining the amount of respect and regard that should be accorded to the animals. Some people agitate that animals should be granted same equal rights as human beings. Inasmuch as I quite agree that animals should be granted some rights in order to be free from cruel treatments by humans, the issue of granting them equal full rights as enjoyed by humans should not come up. An objective review of such factors as tradition, cultural believes, religious, socio-economic, and medical as well as salient natural features that distinguish animals from humans like morality, and ability to…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Although both authors have different opinions on the issue, they each present fitting arguments to represent each of their views. Hasselstrom, a cattle rancher, believes that animals can be killed to benefit human life and still be cared for with love and passion. Regan, on the other hand, a professor and pioneer of the academic movement for animal rights, believes that the harm of animals for any purpose is considered unjust.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant philosophy has contributed in development of "pure" moral philosophy, a "metaphysics of morals" that is based on the concepts of reason, not on empirical observations. According to his philosophy moral obligations are applicable to all human beings as it applies not only for particular person in particular situation, but also to all rational beings in all circumstances.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout this paper, I will contrast and compare two moral theories in attempt to uncover what one provides a better argument and can be applied as a universal moral code. The two moral theorists Immanuel Kant and J.S Mill have created two distinctly different theories on morality and how to develop a universal moral code. Both theories focus on intentions and consequences. Kant believes that the intentions and reasons of our actions can be measured and defined as morally correct, where as Mill believes that our intentions really play no role in morality, and that we should focus on the consequences and outcomes of our actions to evoke the most happiness for the most people. Even though both philosophers make incredibly different points, each encompasses strong arguments as well as issues with their approach. However, Kant will be successful in articulating a better universal moral theory through the use of his categorical imperative.…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moral awareness is sometimes referred to as the human conscience, it supposedly separates us from other animals and allows us to function as a society. A moral is a value that we live our lives by and each one contributes to a moral code of conduct which then becomes a country’s laws.…

    • 883 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The issue of animal rights revolves around the question of whether animals should be given the same rights as humans. (“Animal Rights” Current issues: Macmillian Social Science Library. Detroit: Gale, 2010. Gale Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 1 Nov. 2011) I feel that animals should be treated kindly but using animals in experiments for science and medicine can sometimes be very useful. Many people believe that animals lack the mental and spiritual qualities of humans.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    He further distinguishes that there are different types of imperatives which make us act or think the way that we do in a question of morality. These distinctions are imperatives of skill, imperatives of prudence, and imperatives of morality. Kant does recognize the imperatives of skill and prudence even though he doesn’t believe them to be intrinsically…

    • 1801 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    He has a deontological and absolute approach to ethics, to Kant what makes an action good is when you do your ‘duty’ and that one’s duty is to always flow the moral law. We should not act out of love or compassion. The motive is what makes an action good –nothing else! The consequences to Kant are meaningless it’s the act itself that needs to be right an example of his thinking would be its immoral to kill 1 man in order to save 10. For Kant the fact that we ‘ought’ to do something implies that it is possible to do it. Thus moral statements are prescriptive: they prescribe an action. Ought implies can, ‘if I ought to do X’, it means ‘I can do X’. Kant also believed that moral statements are a priori (knowable prior to experience) and synthetic, that they can be verified by our empirical evidence so are either true or false.…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kantian Ethics

    • 3051 Words
    • 13 Pages

    One of the beautiful things about Kantian ethics is that it is based on the individual. The individual can decide if their actions are worth doing to another person by weighing if the person would want the action done to them. The Kantian point of view is completely different from the Utilitarian point of view because the Kantian point of view deals with the individual, whereas the Utilitarian point of view deals with the group and the needs of the group. When you hear the words “basic human rights” or the word “right,” normally that responds to the individual, and rights in many cases are from the Kantian viewpoint. For instance, when a police officer responds to someone in need, they are responding from a Kantian viewpoint – the rights of an individual. We have extended the Kantian point of view to cover animals as well. When you hear the term “animal rights”, it’s referring to the individual animal and the right of that animal as a living being. What did you do to receive Kantian rights? The answer is – be born. That is all you had to do. Kantian rights theory has a harder time being acknowledged in some collective group and tribal societies. Kantianism is best used where there have been long periods of peace, a practice of respect, of tolerance and understanding. Kantian rights tend to dissolve in warlike conditions. Kant provides an example of a nonconsequentialist approach to ethics. He believed that moral rules could be known on the basis of reason alone, and said that we do not need to know the likely results of an action to judge it morally.…

    • 3051 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    If you had the option to participate in experiments that caused you pain, would you? If you had the alternative to live in a cage or in a house which would you prefer? If you had the choice to live or die which would you choose? The truth is that the majority of humans would fancy living in a house and would not be a part of painful experimentation. So, why do we think that non-human animals deserve any different? Although animal rights and animal welfare frequently fall on the same side of an issue, there is a fundamental difference between the two ideologies: the right of humans to use animals. Like many other issues, there is a wide variety of positions on animal issues. One can imagine a spectrum with animal rights at one end, animal welfare in the middle, and the belief that animals do not deserve any moral consideration on the other end. Many people may find that their views do not fit completely within one box or the other, or may find that their positions change depending on the issue. So, which of the two ideologies is more rational for today’s society? In order to answer this question one must first know what animal rights and animal welfare mean as well as understanding the difference between the two.…

    • 2589 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Most of us believe that we are entitled to treat members of other species in ways which would be considered wrong if inflicted on members of our own species. We kill them for food, keep them confined, use them in painful experiments. The moral philosopher has to ask what relevant difference justifies this difference in…

    • 4954 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Kant’s Groundwork an argument he presents is that ethics rely strongly on reason. He emphasizes that this reason can be obtained by every person who seeks acquire it. He explains that moral truths and ethics are not received by deific revelations and motivations but rather by reasoning that make sense to all humans. Thus he stresses that ethics and moral ideals are universal and unconditional. I agree with Kant’s argument to an extent in the aspect that every individual in the world can seek certain ascribed ethical ideals. For example it is perceived in many western countries that it is ethical to be engaged in a monogamous marriage but not a polygamous one. Therefore a woman or man who is in a polygamous…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays