Preview

Kanthasamy Case Summary

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
103 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kanthasamy Case Summary
This case is on appeal from the Federal Court of Appeal, where the decision to dismiss had been unanimous. The appellant Jekayannan Kanthasamy is hence, appealing the decision dismissing his application for judicial review of the denial of his request for humanitarian and compassionate relief under s.25(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. The respondant in this case is the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration. This appeal was supported by intervenors including the Canadian Council for Refugees, Justice for Children and Youth, Barbra Schlifer Commemorative Clinic, Canadian Centre for Victims of Torture, Canadian Association of Refugee Lawyers and Parkdale Community Legal Services.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Veena Sethi case in the mid 1980s revealed the treatment of prisoners with mental ailment and their long imprisonment for periods running from sixteen to thirty years in custody, far in overabundance of sentences given in the vast majority of these cases—without presenting to them any substantive relief past discharge from illegal custody and transport and sustenance costs till they achieved home. That was some time before there was a cognizance or political enunciation of the rights of people with disabilities—which essentially today incorporates civil and political rights for prisoners with…

    • 93 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    R V. Shankar Case Summary

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Facts: The accused was driving his car without the required laminated taillights when officers pulled him over late October 2004. The police asked Shankar for his licence, registration, and insurance. The accused handed over a licence in the name of Jason Singh, the insurance information handwritten on an informal yellow sticky note, and a photocopy of the vehicle registration. When inquired about the spelling of name, Shankar misspelled Singh as ‘Sing’ and gave the wrong unit number for the home address. Based on these wrong answers, officers arrested Shankar on the basis of misleading them; officers physically removed Shankar from the vehicle and searched him. The officers discovered bulletproof vests on Shankar’s person, Shankar justified these on the basis of self defence and protection. When searching the vehicle police found numerous weapons including two guns, a hunting knife, and ammunition. Shankar did not testify in court, and was charged and convicted of two counts of possession of loaded, prohibited firearms and public mischief. Shankar appealed his conviction to the Ontario Court of…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. How does John’s outlook about receiving help affect his ability to get his needs met?…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cases in Canadian Law

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dehghani v. Canada: The appellant, a citizen of Iran, arrived in Canada on May 13, 1989, and claimed refugee status. After being questioned in the primary examination line, he was referred to a secondary examination, which involved a long wait, and, as he did not speak English, an interpreter was provided for him. At the secondary interview, the appellant omitted significant facts. This case involves two issues that are worthy of analysis, as he claims, first of all, that he was detained in a manner that violated s. 10(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms during the secondary examination at the airport and, also, that this examination violated his right to counsel. The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the lower court and dismissed the appeal. This decision substantiated the right of the state to have an interest in controlling entry into the country and that it is a valid procedure for individuals to undergo questioning when crossing international borders. After the secondary examination, the appellant was advised of his right to counsel to aid him in pursing his claim and he was subsequently represented by counsel in federal court. While having counsel is a crucial right, this case substantiates that it is not appropriate to all circumstances. Counsel is not provided for routine traffic stops. Likewise, the Court is justified in ruling that it is not required for routine immigration questioning.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief - R. v. Hufsky

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This case was brought before the Supreme Court of Canada, after a failed appeal in the Court of Appeal, issues concerning whether the non-universal proclamation of S. 234.1 of the Criminal Code infringed on the right to equality before the law, as outlined in S. 1 (b) of the Bill of Rights, the second issue raised in the lower courts was whether the random stopping of cars by police officers infringed on the right not to be arbitrarily detained described by S. 9 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and another major issue raised in the lower courts was whether Mr. Hufsky’s rights were infringed upon…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Zinn, R., and P. Brethour. 1999. Law of Human Rights in Canada: Practices and Procedures. Aurora: Canada…

    • 4858 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Canadian Identity

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages

    "Canadian Council for Refugees." A Hundred Years of Immigration to Canada 1900. N.p., n.d. Web. 12 June 2013.…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    3. The Immigration and Refugee Board is subject to a right to statutory appeal as per section 62 and section 63(1)…..63(5) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act.…

    • 1839 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Overview Ch 1-7

    • 5762 Words
    • 24 Pages

    Rule: For the past forty years it has been the rule that liability belongs only to the…

    • 5762 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There have been numerous legal responses to asylum seekers in Australia, all of which have been ineffective in achieving fair outcomes for both Australian citizens and refugees seeking asylum in Australia. The basis for all legislation regarding refugees in Australia is the Migration Act 1958, which outlines powers such as being able to cap the number of refugees accepted into Australia each year, and defines a refugee as somebody “being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion”, which is written according to the United Nation’s definition.12 Since then a number of amendments and additions have been made to this act, including the Migration Amendment Act 1992, Pacific Solution, Migration Amendment (Abolishing Detention Debt) Act 2009 and the Regional Resettlement Arrangement (RRA) Australia and Papua New Guinea. All of these legal responses to the issue of asylum seekers in Australia have proven ineffective as they fail to achieve fair outcomes for either those seeking asylum in Australia or the present citizens of Australia.…

    • 1599 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case of Harshad Mehta

    • 3431 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Harshad Mehta aka Deep Chhaya was an Indian stockbroker and is alleged to have engineered the rise in the BSE stock exchange in the year 1992. Exploiting several loopholes in the banking system, Mehta and his associates siphoned off funds from inter-bank transactions and bought shares heavily at a premium across many segments, triggering a rise in the Sensex. When the scheme was exposed, the banks started demanding the money back, causing the collapse. He was later charged with 72 criminal offenses and more than 600 civil action suits were filed against him. He died in 2002 with many litigations still pending against him.…

    • 3431 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In special reference No.1 of 2002 , Re, (Gujarat assembly election matter) , the debate in the constituent assembly on article 85 and 174 was looked into. Khare, J .(as the learned chief justice then was) referred to kesavanandabharti case in support of the proposition that the constituent assembly debates are permissible aids in construction to ascertain intention to the constitution. The learned judge observed as follows :…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Custodial Death

    • 4262 Words
    • 18 Pages

    I greatly acknowledge the courtesy of my International Humanitarian Law & Human Rights faculty Mr. Rhishikesh Dave for his assistance and encouragement for preparing the present project. I am greatly thankful to him for his guidance and support for completing this project. I would like to thank the library staff of Gujarat National Law University for providing me with the reference facilities and helping me in preparing this project.…

    • 4262 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Research Paper

    • 5162 Words
    • 21 Pages

    Overview of Refugees Situation in India................................................................................... 1 Roadblocks to Formulating a Law.............................................................................................. 4 The Refugee Law and Its Benefits.............................................................................................. 6 Conclusion and Recommendations............................................................................................ 9…

    • 5162 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays