Preview

Kansas Bleeding Kansas

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1916 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kansas Bleeding Kansas
Bleeding Kansas is a term used to describe the period of violence during the settling of the Kansas territory. The period of violence in 1854 is called, "The Bleeding Kansas". The Missouri Compromise was overturned and became the "Kansas-Nebraska Act. This new act would let the residents decide whether the area would become a slave state or a free state. Of all the Union States Kansas suffered the most casualties because of the issues of slavery being divided. Free-state settlers and proslavery settlers went to Kansas to help decide the decision. The Republican Party opposed slavery which promoted the Democrats to conform with the Republicans. The political fight over slavery is what led to the civil conflict in Kansas.
In the decades
…show more content…
5 days later, 68 federal troops stationed in Charleston, South Carolina, withdrew to castle SUMTER, an island in CHARLESTON HARBOR. The North considered the citadel to be the assets of the united states government. The humans of South Carolina believed it belonged to the new Confederacy. 4 months later, the primary engagement of the Civil struggle passed off on this disputed soil. The commander at citadel Sumter, primary ROBERT ANDERSON, was a former slave proprietor who was though genuinely unswerving to the Union. With 6,000 South Carolina, armed forces ringing the harbor, Anderson and his squaddies had been reducing off from reinforcements and resupplies. In January 1861, as one the closing acts of his management, President James Buchanan dispatched two hundred infantrymen and components on an unarmed merchant vessel, celebrity OF THE WEST, to reinforce Anderson. It speedy departed when South Carolina artillery started out firing on it.The Civil struggle started out at four:30 a.m. on April 12, 1861, when accomplice artillery, under the command of fashionable PIERRE GUSTAVE T. BEAUREGARD, opened fire on citadel Sumter. confederate batteries showered the fort with over three,000 shells in a three-and-a-half of day length. Anderson surrendered. mockingly, Beauregard had advanced his army capabilities under Anderson's education at West point. This became the primary of infinite relationships and families devastated …show more content…
Going as far back as 1798, there had been an ongoing debate over whether or not the Federal government had the right to pass laws that contradicted laws already in place at the State level. While many people claim that the South was attempting to break up the Union, it was more accurately a case of them attempting to stand up for themselves and declare that the laws passed within a State had superiority. In fact, the preamble to the Confederate States Constitution starts with "We, the people of the Confederate States, each State acting in its sovereign and independent character. And that’s what the who or what is to blame for the South’s Secession from the United

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    His 115 = Civil War

    • 1994 Words
    • 8 Pages

    * Also referred to as “Bleeding Kansas” and allowed territories to determine if they would allow slavery within their boundaries or not…

    • 1994 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Battle of Fort Sumter is the first battle of the Civil War. Fort Sumter is located in an artificial island in the harbor of Charleston, South Carolina, built in the wake of the War of 1812 . After South Carolina’s secession from the Union on December 20, 1860, Maj. Robert Anderson and his force of 85 soldiers were positioned at Fort Moultrie near the mouth of Charleston Harbor. On December 26, fearing for their safety, Anderson moved his command to Fort Sumter. All the forts along the coast except Fort Sumter and other four forts, had been given up to the Confederate States without having to fight. But Sumter was especially important because of its location and its purpose: to guard the Charleston Harbor, a territory of significance for the rebels.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Southern Secession

    • 1211 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “If slavery must not expand in your mind, it’s settled, we as a state secede from the governing of the Union and join a greater power, the Confederacy. We will no longer be hampered in your hatred towards our way of living. ”…“Then be on your way, I shall not dabble in your cruel pro-slavery reasoning. Just bear the knowledge in mind, we are stronger as a whole.” The Missouri Compromise kept inevitable split of the Nation at bay when it prohibited slavery north of the parallel 3630’ north line. This was later repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which implemented idea of popular sovereignty. This led to “Bleeding Kansas.” “Border Ruffians,” who were pro-slavery and the voted in Kansas started “Bleeding Kansas” so Kansas would be admitted as a slave state although, Kansas wanted to become a free state. Following this vote, many violent out bursts within Kansas occurred, around 80 altogether were killed. About three months later, the Battle of Fort Sumter began the Civil War. Lincoln’s election, conflicting views of slavery and the lack of power within the Southern government led to the Southern states seceding from the Union in 1860 and 1861.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By this time, so many more Northerners had become opposed, morally, to slavery and had spoken out against. Many people were opposed to slavery because the white families had a very hard time competing against the inexpensive labor of the slaves and could not rise above to grasp what everyone wanted, the American dream. When the Kansas-Nebraska Act was put into place in the hopes that popular choice would make Kansas a slave state and Nebraska a free state which would maintain balance and would also organize even more territory coming in from the Louisiana Purchase in order to further the railroad construction. This conflict instigated dramatic change in addition to the change created by negating the Missouri Compromise Line. Because it repealed the Missouri Compromise in which slavery was not to expand north of the 36’30 line and also because many in Kansas were thoroughly against slavery, both morally, and for their financial well-being which led to the event known as Bleeding Kansas where bloodshed had become evident over the dispute, this change also involved the end of peaceful compromise. Those opposed to the spread of slavery like John Brown went to Kansas and killed pro-slavery Southerners. Those who thought the political strategy of popular sovereignty would maintain balance were proved wrong when the territory became chaotic.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil War inevitable

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Nevertheless, after seizing Mexico and the spreading of territories westward the South depended highly on slavery because of the "cotton king". One of these territories included the Kansas-Nebraska where many newcomers and the proslavery settlers began to move into the territory. In this territory after the 1852 election, the temporary peace of the Compromise of 1850 came to an end. Senator Stephen Douglas passes the Kansas-Nebraska Act which created two new territories of Kansas and Nebraska. The status of slavery in the area was decided to be by popular sovereignty. This act wrecked two compromises The Compromise of 1820, and 1850, and the democratic party. While the act formed a new party: the Republicans.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John C. Calhoun proposed the states' right theory and attempted to enact nullification twice, after each of two tariffs that South Carolinians saw as one sided and unconstitutional was passed, first in 1828 and the second in 1832. Calhoun felt that his beloved South Carolina, and the south in general, were being exploited by the tariffs. These pieces of legislature, Calhoun argued, favored the manufacturing interests in New England and protected them from foreign competition. Calhoun wrote the South Carolina Exposition for his state's legislature in 1828. It declared that no state was bound by a federal law which it believed was unconstitutional. The secession of South Carolina from the Union was the most extreme way that the South argued for states' rights. John C. Calhoun was, perhaps, best remembered for his part in inspiring the South's effort to achieve national independence in the Civil War, even though it took place nearly twelve years after his death.…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prior to 1860 the United States was already split into opposing sides fighting for power. Although these conflicts never reached the battlefield, the slave’s states and Free states were always competing for representation in congress. South Carolina felt that certain powers were restrained from them and it imperiled their continued existence as sovereign states (DOC A). So, as the leader, they declared secession with several states following shortly after. They were then called the Confederate states of America. This was so revolutionary because the Union destroyed everything in the South and it led to the strengthening of Federal Power over the states.…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Part of the disputes that led to the Civil War (1861–1865) concerned federalism. Many Southerners felt that state governments alone had the right to make important decisions, such as whether slavery should be legal. Advocates ofstates’ rights believed that the individual state governments had power over the federal government because the states had ratified the Constitution to create the federal government in the first place. Most Southern states eventually seceded from the Union because they felt that secession was the only way to protect their rights. But Abraham Lincoln and many Northerners held that the Union could not be dissolved. The Union victory solidified the federal government’s power over the states and ended the debate over states’ rights.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another reason was because of Cultural Secessionism: any group which was previously in a minority has a right to protect and develop its own culture and distinct national identity through seceding into an independent state. The South also stated that Secession was justified because of Anarcho-Capitalism, this is the individual liberty to form political associations and private property rights together justify right to secede and to create a “viable political order” with like-minded individuals. The main argument that the Southern States had for secession from the union was called Democratic Secessionism, this exercises the right of secession, as a variant of the right of self-determination, is vested in a “territorial community” which wishes to secede from “their existing political community”; the group wishing to secede then proceeds to delimit “its” territory by the…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bleeding Kansas is the phrase that represents the duration of the disturbance during the settling of the Kansas territory. Because of the Kansas-Nebraska Act, the residents now had to determine whether the area would become a free or slave state. Since there was so much dispute between pro-slavery and anti-slavery people, a war developed inside Kansas.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 was a controversial legislation that opened Kansas and Nebraska to white settlement, repealed the Compromise of 1850, and led opponents to form the Republican party. This piece of legislation was introduced in Congress that revived the issues of the expansion of slavery. The Compromise of 1850 was a series of measures passed by Congress to resolve sectional tensions. Congress admitted California to the Union as a free state. And organize the territories of New Mexico, Nevada, Arizona, and Utah without mention of slavery. It also paid Texan $10 million to relinquish land claims in New Mexico and abolished the slave trade in the District of Columbia (but not slavery) while enacted a law requiring the return of fugitive slaves. (Martin 369)Douglas who pushed the Compromise of 1850, and then stated he “would never make a speech of slavery again” also proposed that the area west of Iowa and Missouri (which was set aside as permanent Indian reservation) be organized as the Nebraska territory to white settlers. Since Nebraska was located in the northern half of the…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Secession Dbq Essay

    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages

    There is certainly no shortage of opinion on whether the southern states had the right to secede from the union in 1860-61. After all, northern state governments as well as the election of Lincoln placed the south into a defensive posture to protect their particular institution. Secession has a long history in world governmental intercourse and the founding of American independence did not inoculate them from the threats of secession. States began to discuss secession even before the ink had dried on the new constitution. Justification, regardless as to the state threatening secession, was founded on the belief that the states had the right to govern themselves and the right of the people to abolish a government when it becomes destructive…

    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The South felt as if this was another way for the union to take control of the law making. Also with the fact that it only took two thirds of the states to pass an amendment after the civil war. This lead to many of the southern whites in anger and news articles saying things speaking out against their new politicians. In the Atlanta Constitution “As Mr. Bullock who claims to be Governor of Georgia, is endeavoring to eject Democrats from their seats in the Legislation” (The Atlanta Constitution Pg. 2). The south is feels that…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    their views on the Constitution; the South felt that individual states should have the right…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bleeding Kansas is the period of violence during the settling of Kansas. The Kansas-Nebraska Act nullified the Missouri compromise and instead used popular sovereignty. Free-state and proslavery settlers rushed into Kansas hoping to influence their opinions and ideas into the state's decision. Soon violence attacks started to occur. Including John Brown's raid on Harper’s Ferry.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays