Preview

Juveniles Court Process And Terms: Questions And Answers

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
352 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Juveniles Court Process And Terms: Questions And Answers
Juveniles Court Process & Terms
CJA 204
September 26th, 2014
Professor Kahl
University of Phoenix
Juveniles Court Process & Terms

Answer # 1
Statutory Exclusion
Statutory exclusion is where an individual is under a certain age, 18 in most states. When you are under age you are considered a juvenile and therefore cannot be tried as an adult. The detention hearing must also take place within twenty-four hours of being held at a detention facility. U.s department of justice. ().
Answer # 2
Prosecutorial Discretion
The Legislature has given the prosecutor discretion on filing with a defined list of cases in adult and juvenile courts. The prosecutor also gets to choose which court will handle the matter. U.s department of justice. ().
…show more content…
In a juvenile case there is a major emphasis on privacy, as well as an evidentiary standard where the judge must weigh all the evidence. The juvenile has no right to a trial by jury. U.s department of justice. ().
Answer # 4
Acquitted of charges/ dismissed of charges
Charges for a juvenile may be dropped at the end of the informal probationary period if the juvenile meets all the conditions given. The intake officers also have the ability to choose to divert or dismiss the charges all together. When a juveniles charges are diverted they may be sent to a job training program, mental health facility, or even drug treatment. U.s department of justice. ().
Answer # 5
Release
The release of a juvenile is often ordered after a period of time has been served, the juvenile may be released to aftercare or parole. The juvenile is still under supervision of the state and if thereis a violation of aftercare or parole there is a risk of going back the juvenile institution. U.s department of justice.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    “In order to determine which juveniles are appropriate for criminal court jurisdiction, states have established various criteria. Typically, the juveniles have to meet certain age and offense criteria” (Elroy & Ryder, 2014).…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States government is based on a checks and balances type system. The three main parts of this system are the executive branch, the legislative branch, and the judicial branch. This judicial system’s job is to uphold the law of the land. Law can be defined as a set of rules or norms of conduct which mandate, proscribe or permit specified relationships among people and organizations, provide methods for ensuring the impartial treatment of such people, and provide punishments for those who do not follow the established rules of conduct (Wikipedia.org, 2005). This is a very wide and all encompassing definition of the law and the governing judicial system. Just like the United States government the judicial system is broken up into different checks, balances, and systems. Two of these main systems are the juvenile justices system and the adult justice system. The obvious difference between these two courts is that the juvenile system is designed to handle youth offenders and the adult system is designed to handle adult offenders. Both of these two systems despite their difference have the same end goal; to administer justice. In the pages to follow we will discuss the big picture of the juvenile justice system, go over a point by point comparison between the juvenile system and the adult system, touch on both the benefits and disadvantages to being tried as a minor in the juvenile court from the perspective of a minor, and review the societal implication of abolishing the juvenile court system.…

    • 2342 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Some of the processes for both of the courts are similar; however, they use different terminology, such as adults have bail hearings whereas juveniles have detention hearings, adults with trials and juveniles with fact-finding hearings. An adult has a complaint or indictment filed against them, although a juvenile is accused with a petition being filed against them. The adult is identified as the defendant in the court, but the juvenile is referred to as the respondent. The verdict is agreed upon by the jury in the adult court system, whereas the judge makes a ruling, referred to as the adjudication. In an adult court case, the defendant is found to be guilty or not guilty, however the juveniles are found to be delinquent or involved. While the differences exist amongst the two court systems, the adult and juvenile courts share similarities such as, both the criminal and the delinquent have the right to an attorney.. Delinquents have the privilege against self-incrimination, just as criminals have the same right, including the right to receive the notice of charges, and lastly the prosecution must provide proof beyond a reasonable doubt before a person can be…

    • 1973 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Juveniles are not subject to a public trial but rather a fact-finding hearing in which the judge renders judgment upon the evidence and allegations of the juvenile with no jury present (The Clark County Prosecuting Attorney, n.d.). Instead of receiving an indictment, formal list of charges specified for the individual, the juvenile may receive a petition which the facts of the crime committed by the juvenile is listed. This petition must include the statutes giving the juvenile court jurisdiction a well as the statutes that have been violated by the juvenile (The Clark County Prosecuting Attorney, n.d.). At the end of the trial, the juvenile can be deemed delinquent in which the juvenile is held responsible for the actions of the crime and may be sent to a probation or detention program rather than being sent to prison or…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The U.S. Supreme Court has recognized that juveniles have many of the constitutional due process rights afforded adult defendants: the right to counsel, the right to notice of the charges against them, the right to confront and cross-examine witnesses, and the right against self-incrimination. In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967). Juveniles also have the right to have the alleged offense proven beyond a reasonable doubt. In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358, 368 (1970). The North Carolina Juvenile Code provides additional statutory rights to juveniles, such as the right to have a parent present during in-custody interrogation, the presumption of indigency, and confidentiality of juvenile court records. G.S. 7B-2101(a), -2000(b), -3000(b). The principal rights are discussed in this chapter, although it is not intended to be exhaustive.…

    • 5855 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The court system for juveniles in the United States was first formed in 1899, in Cook County, Illinois, which then was quickly spread across the country and most other state courts decided to establish one as well, that then in turn created the juvenile justice system. With the purpose of rehabilitating each underage offender in order for them to become a productive part of society and also to protect them by having them separated from any type of exposure to adult offenders and mentally ill adult offenders that were incarcerated as well.…

    • 3966 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Juvenile Court Case Study

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A judicial waiver occurs when a juvenile court judge transfers a case from juvenile to adult court in order to deny the juvenile the protections that juvenile jurisdictions provide. Statutory exclusion, are provisions in the law to exclude some offenses, such as first-degree murder, from juvenile court jurisdiction. Concurrent jurisdiction is a legal provision, which allows the prosecutor to file a juvenile case in both juvenile and adult court because the offense and the age of the accused meet certain…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    "47 States and the District of Columbia provide judicial discretion to waive certain juveniles to criminal court. Thirty-seven States and the District of Columbia have one or more statutory exclusion provisions, and 10 States and the District of Columbia have direct file provisions." (p.1)…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juvenile waiver purpose aims to fill many different voids and address challenges in our justice system, which can be observed even in the different ways juveniles may be waived into adult court. One of the first methods waiving juveniles to adult court is with judicial waiver offenses, in which the juvenile court judge’s personally transfer cases to adult courts in order to prevent persons who are usually repeat offender’s; from the special protections that juvenile court systems provide. This ensures that certain individuals will not have the leverage of other youthful offenders, and ideally aren’t allowed to use age protection laws to their aid any longer. Another way in which cases are transported is through statutory exclusions that are…

    • 181 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dual Court System

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As a result, these systems have restructured of a number of prisoners and the acknowledgment that young offenders need to be treated differently. The courts want to make sure that juveniles do not commit any more offenses and put the minors in rehabilitation if necessary. It would be harder to release a juvenile back into society if they were trail as an adult. Parole was a great idea to save the state money. When a person is sentenced to prison and serves 85% of their time and have good behavior, they become eligible for parole. While on parole, they are still considered an inmate. The inmate must fellow all the rules code of conduct while being on parole. Probation is a sentence ordered by a judge instead of serving time in jail. Caplan (2012), "Probation is imposed either for lesser offenses like shoplifting, or after release from prison for more serious offenses — are considered easy time compared with incarceration and a first step toward a fresh start” (para.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. Adjudicatory Hearing – The Criminal Justice Today textbook defines the term adjudicatory hearing as “the fact-finding process by which the juvenile court determines whether there is sufficient evidence to sustain the allegations in a petition” (Schmalleger 510). These types of trials are designated for juveniles, which are similar in nature to adult trials, with notable exceptions. Similarities derive from the fact that the due process rights of children and adults are essentially the same. Essentially, it is a trial process in which a court determines whether or not the allegations contained in a petition are supported by evidence. It is also known as the legal process for resolving some legal dispute and a hearing may be held by a court…

    • 2064 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Juvenile Justice Outline

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I. Introduction: Many people would currently be surprised to find that youths being tried by Juvenile Courts are not afforded the basic rights guaranteed to our nation’s citizens by our Constitution. Advocates continue to push for more juvenile rights in the court system but many youths who find themselves in trouble will not be afforded basic rights and the due process of law based on their age. This paper will discuss the evolution of basic rights in the juvenile courts system, the current state of the issue, and suggestions…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    If a minor is not tried as an adult, his or her, case is heard by a judge, no jury and in a juvenile court. Then a judge gets to decide what is in the best interest for the child and the child's family. A lot of children that commit crimes come from screwed-up backgrounds and could use some help getting on the right track. So a juvenile judge could sentence the child to a reform school or a juvenile facility with a rehabilitation program and release as the…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “A Broken Juvenile Justice System.” Baltimore Sun. N.p., 06 Aug. 2012. Web. 20 Mar. 2013 http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2012-08-06/news/bs-ed-juvenile-jail-editorial-20120806_1_million-juvenile-jail-adult-facility-youthful-offenders…

    • 2312 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rights of Juveniles

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A) Kent v. U.S. - A young man by the name of Morris Kent, age 14 was charged with numerous burglaries and attempted purse snatching in the District of Columbia in 1959. Kent was placed on juvenile probation and subsequently two years later was suspected of burglary and rape after his fingerprints were found at a woman’s apartment. He was detained for questioning and during this time he was evaluated for any mental sicknesses. A juvenile court judge felt that Kent should be tried as an adult so he transferred his case to the adult courts. Kent was found guilty of his crimes even though it was proven he suffered from a mental disease. The lawyers for the defendant believed it was unfair that Kent, 16 years old at the time was not given a hearing in juvenile court and appealed the fact that he was tried in an adult court. The decision was later overturned and measures were put in place to have juveniles be heard in a juvenile court, their records be accessible to their lawyers before being transferred to adult courts.…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays