Preview

Juvenile Life Sentencing Case Study

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1880 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Juvenile Life Sentencing Case Study
Introduction Out of all of the great powers in the world, the United States is the only country that still allows its courts to handout life sentences to juveniles who break the law.
According to Lisa Yun (2011), A recent study conducted by Human Rights Watch and Amnesty international revealed that there are currently at least 2574 inmates incarcerated in the United States who have been sentenced to spend the rest of their lives in prison without the possibility of parole for crimes they committed as adolescents (p. 728).
With court cases such as Graham v Florid and Sullivan v Florida the court system has shown small progressions towards terminating a judge’s ability to deliver life sentences to juveniles, but it does not give a great
…show more content…
735). Famous cases that involve the question of sentencing juveniles to life in jail without parole include Graham v Florida, Sullivan v Florida, and Roper v Simmons. In the case of Graham v Florida, Terrance Graham was only one month shy of turning eighteen when he was sentenced to life in jail without parole. Graham was originally arrested at the age of sixteen for armed robbery and spent a year in a pre-trial detention center before getting placed on probation for the next three years. When he was seventeen years old Terrance violated his probation with his involvement in a home invasion with two twenty-year-old friends. According to …show more content…
Data has shown that out of the 192 countries in the United Nations that the only countries that still allows juvenile offenders to be sentenced to life imprisonment without parole is the United States and Somalia (Yun, 2011). Soon the U. S. will be alone in on having this ability because Somalia has implicated that they will soon adapt to the CRC. The United States delegation has said to the United Nations that they will only use the sentence of life imprisonment without parole for only particular cases and that the sentence is reserved for only the worst offenders. This process has not been followed and has been shown in cases such as People v Petty. In the case of People v Petty, Petty was sent to prison for life at the age of fifteen for encouraging his twelve year old accomplice to kill their victim (Yun, 2011). The United States seems to be alone on having the ability to sentence juveniles to life in prison without parole, and in a 2008 study it is show that roughly .02 percent of offenders serving life without parole were juveniles when they committed the crime. (Pilfer,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ousley had committed murder on his family and was charged for three life sentences, and due to the actions, he was sentenced to 75 years in prison but, his reason of why he had decided this was never heard.”It was neither a materially deprived existence nor a physically abusive one[…] Yet at a young age, he was aware of the profoundly circumscribed orbit in which his family moved”(Greg Ousley is sorry, Anderson, 30). In his childhood greg was suffering from depression and he felt lonely which leads to the reasons of youth adult sentencing is unnecessary. Over the years spent in prison Greg had showed improvement on short notice that he felt ready for the real world and wanted his sentence to be reduced. After showing improvement in himself, greg was seen by many and his sentence was extremely reduced which proves that a minor does not deserve a life…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Recently, the United States Supreme Court has decided to hear a Florida case, Sullivan v. State, 987 So.2d 83 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008), where a minor received a life without parole sentence in a conviction for rape.3 This note will analyze the Sullivan case and predict how the Court will likely rule. There are two dimensions that this note will discuss: First, the Eighth Amendment jurisprudence of the United States Supreme Court regarding proportionality in sentencing. And second, the Court’s treatment of minors under the Eight Amendment’s “cruel and unusual” clause.…

    • 3052 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court declared laws that require judges to impose life-without-parole sentences for juveniles to be in violation of the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of “cruel and unusual punishments.” The decision ( Miller v. Alabama ) was a 5-4 split in the Court – which is typical of many such decisions that apply the cruel and unusual punishment provision.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people around the nation have different views on the subject of juvenile justice. Some believe that despite the children's age, they should still be tried as an adult if a serious crime is committed. On the other hand, some believe children should not be tried as adult even if they commit a rather serious crime. I firmly that these children should not be sentenced to life in prison despite the serious crime that they have committed and should have another shot at life when their brain is fully developed.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During Young’s resentencing, two police officers, two witnesses, a psychologist, a letter, his family and attorney appeared during the decision of release or a shortened sentence. The resentencing testimony took a long period of time before th judge made a decision. After hearing Young’s testimony of rehabilitaion, an apologized testimony to his witnesse, which he lived with regret and remorse, still gave the judge no pity or mercy on his resentencing. In quote the judge said, “If I released you today, I might as well give you the key to the city, a parade, and a dinner at Burns. It is a gift, and you do not deserve it.” The inialitive correlation of these armed robberies ties back to Bethea, who is later mentioned to be the crack cocaine dealer of Young’s Mother, Stephanie. Bethea threathed Young to help him rob motels or else he would have killed both Young and his mother. After hearing all sides and all witnesses in the hearing, the judged reduced the sentence to 30 more years in confinement and 10 years of probation with “good behavior”. Kenneth Young will be released in 2030, so by the time he is 45 years old. They mentioned that the average african american lives up to 50-72 years, and found this “fair”. His mother and attorney, Paolo Annino is still…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Summary: This past Monday a ruling was upheld by the Supreme Court from 2012 baring the immediate life sentences for juveniles. In the past this has been an issue in Florida, with one of the nationwide highest crime rates for those under the age of 18. Last year the Florida Supreme Court ruled unanimously that all juveniles convicted of homicide who received automatic life sentences must be resentenced under a state law passed in 2014. The U.S. Supreme Court ruling Monday could have had an effect on the Florida Constitution was crucial news for anyone affected by this law.…

    • 1595 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jazmyne Garcia Shywanda Royal English 12b 04/6/16 Juveniles deserve life sentencing It is more likely for teenagers to commit heinous crimes when they have been emotionally and physically abused. Teenagers who suffer from a mental illness are more likely to commit recidivism than an adult that has random encounters with the law. Prosecutors who try juveniles as adults believe that a crime is a crime, even if the person who committed it was a young adult.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juveniles who commit heinous crimes are capable of change, so convicting them as adults and giving them a life sentence doesn't allow them to do so. In Gail Garinger’s, “Juveniles Don't Deserve Life Sentences”, Garinger states the the 79 juveniles in the US who are convicted to a life sentence, are seen as unchangeable and no one cares what becomes of them. But from personal experiences of being a former judge, Garinger had see first hand the juvenile's capacity to turn themselves around. If a juvenile were to be convicted to die in prison, they would be never be given the opportunity to show their change. They should be given an opportunity to show their growth and maturity, but life in prison denies them that. Life in prison denies these young individuals the access to…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On June 25, 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that juveniles who committed murder could not be sentenced to life in prison. A few justices believed life in prison without parole for a juvenile prevents consideration for their chronological age and its features. But four justices disagreed saying that heinous crimes committed by juveniles should be punished with a sentence of life in prison, or a 17-year-old would be released to society after he had gun down his fellow classmates and teachers. I disagree with the Supreme Court ruling. I believe that every juvenile who has committed a heinous crime should be sentenced to life in prison without parole. The victims of the crime would get the justice they deserve, they are at the age where they should know what they are doing, and brain development does not play a fact to juveniles committing heinous crimes .…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Before 1980, life without parole was very rarely imposed on children. In today’s society we are consumed with the idea of keeping everyone safe; this has led to a high incarceration rate, especially with minors. In America, currently 2,225 minors are sentenced to life without parole before they turn eighteen. The criminal justice system works on a three strike system, which means you have three minor offenses before you go to jail. Also with the strikes, you are judged on if your crime was of passion or pre-meditated. In the past the issue in judging each situation was that sometimes “children” or minors were charged as adults, due to mandatory minimum sentencing. This is no longer the issue because in 2012, the Supreme Court case (Miller v. Alabama) found mandatory minimum sentencing unconstitutional under the 8th amendment, (which bans cruel and unusual punishments). The problem now is what the Supreme Court forgot to address in there ruling; does this ruling apply to the roughly three hundred adults serving life without parole that were sentenced as juveniles. Adolfo Davis is the leading case that is addressing…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty for juveniles is a serious injustice issue. The death penalty for juveniles began with the English common law and the first who was executed was out of Massachusetts in 1642. Over the course of history, children could be tried in court as early as seven years of age. Children are vulnerable to so many different things throughout their young lives. These things involve peer pressure, stress, controlling their emotions, and more. More than likely, juveniles sentence to the death penalty come from homes where they are already physically, mentally, and emotionally abused, low income backgrounds, and other types of unstable environments. In the juvenile justice system, most believe the juveniles can be rehabilitated with effective counseling and mentoring programs. Sentencing a child to the death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment. These children do not think of the crimes alone. There…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Despite the fact that in America we incarcerate more juveniles for life terms than in any other country in the world, that truth is that the vast majority of youth offenders will one day be released. The question is simple and stark. Do we want to help them change or do we want to help them become even more violent and dangerous?” by Ayelet Waldman. The quote points out that the U.S. punishing juveniles by putting them in jail for lifetime more than any other countries around the world can be harmful and also helpful as the same time. Many states have also tried the method in a purpose of decreasing the crimes rate and as it has worked in some places, there are also some unexpected results over some places. A punishment of life without parole for juvenile criminals has become a big matter between people. Proponents argue that the plan is helpful and it has decreased the crimes rate over some places while opponents argue that punishments do only little change to behavior.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juvenile Justice has been a prominent controversy in present day society. We can observe how the majority of crimes committed are being perpetrated by adolescents. The disputation arises on whether the Supreme Court justice should abolish mandatory life in prison for pubescents who commit the immorality of murder or authorize the punishment with parole. Although many can challenge this contrary issue, I concur with ideology of the Supreme Court ruling that juveniles who engage in murder could not be sentenced to life in prison due to the protection the 8th amendment granting defense from cruel and unusual punishment.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the Supreme Court ruled is as a “cruel and unusual punishment,” the sentence if fair because the convicted committed an act of murder that took away another person’s life. Such an example is Greg Ousley, who purposely murdered his parents and planned the murder days before he committed it (Greg Ousely Is Sorry, 9). Unlike previous scenarios mentioned, Ousley purposely planned for the murder of his parents. Despite the fact that he was still a teenager when he committed the murder, he had an intention to silence his parents and killed both of them in cold blood. This greatly differs from the previous convicted juveniles who accidentally killed their victims. Juveniles that have motives such as Ousley should be convicted as an adult and be sentenced a life in prison because, despite their age, they can think and act like an adult. Because of this, the Supreme Court’s decision of disallowing “teenagers” from “cruel and unusual punishments” should be overturned on certain cases, because, as seen in Ousely, some teenagers are capable and can plan murders beforehand. This not only reveals that certain teenagers can plan beforehand, but that they can think like adults in order to murder someone with…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A sixteen- year-old is prosecuted in adult court and is given the life sentence without any chance at parole. He doesn’t understand what is happening. His brain isn’t developed like any adults, nor does her comprehend the court surroundings. He is practically a victim to the justice system as he is being treated the same as a thirty-year-old criminal. Any offender under the age of twenty-one should be separated from adults in the justice system.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays