Preview

Juvenile Justice Argumentative Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
805 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Juvenile Justice Argumentative Analysis
Juvenile Justice has been a prominent controversy in present day society. We can observe how the majority of crimes committed are being perpetrated by adolescents. The disputation arises on whether the Supreme Court justice should abolish mandatory life in prison for pubescents who commit the immorality of murder or authorize the punishment with parole. Although many can challenge this contrary issue, I concur with ideology of the Supreme Court ruling that juveniles who engage in murder could not be sentenced to life in prison due to the protection the 8th amendment granting defense from cruel and unusual punishment. Juveniles do not deserve life sentences, because placing them in a facility with adults will only decrease the possibility …show more content…
Additionally, Thompson justifies the massive loss of brain tissue during adolescent’s years; they are still under development and shouldn’t be evaluated as a whole (Thompson, 2001). Jennifer Jenkins in her article “On Punishment and Teen Killers” asserts that she does not accept the “underdeveloped brain” argument, because she solemnly believes that if that were the reason, then teens would all have the urge to kill at roughly identical rates all over the world .Her argumentative opinion is hasty generalizing since she is presuming that all teenagers are alike and will be tempted to commit murder. Brains grow and change at different paces according to Thompson’s research group at the University of California, Los Angeles were they have developed technology to map the patterns of brain in individual children and teens …show more content…
In my opinion I do not think one is born a natural killer I strongly believe that the form we are raised part takes in the manner we will mature and become aware of what is correct. For example, I have observed that teens in my city are more prone to perhaps have the tendency to steal or commit a wrongful act rather than someone that lives in a better community. My thoughts are conceivably owing to the fact that many homes in my city are suffuse with drug intake, violence, environments in were a juvenile has countless problems or etc. If a child is exposed to these surroundings at all times then there can be a chance he/ she will reason that it is normal, because they become accustomed to that way of life. In a New York times article titled “Greg Ousley Is Sorry for Killing His Parents. Is that Enough?” explains a story in were a teenager killed his parents out of the blue one day , because he claimed they were never going to change and they will never listen to him either additionally to him being fed up with other family problems . He said “I have been thinking about killing them every time I got mad” “They don’t seem to understand me”. Greg’s thoughts and behavior were urged by his problematic home life where he was constantly the prime provocateur of his mother’s rages. The mother would

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Juvenile Justice

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Adolescents’ comparative developmental immaturity contributes to immature decision and criminal behavior with poor decision making, not thinking about the future, giving in to peer pressure, risk taking, unformed identity, impulsivity and self-control. Nathaniel Brazill, age 14 when he committed the crime, and was convicted of first-degree murder facing life in prison without parole. When confronting a Florida grand jury, Brazill would often look confused, when the verdicts were being read. Giving the fact that juveniles are incapable to stand trail. Assistant professor Paul Thompson of neurology at the University of…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    On June 25, 2012, the Supreme Court had ruled that juveniles who committed a crime such as murder, could not be sentenced to life in prison because it is violating the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment. In the supreme court decision, I agree that it is harsh and should not be allowed for a minor to serve life in prison, even if murder is committed. The decision is agreeable due to the severe punishment on someone young whose life is ruined over the decision they made. The information on a minor is misleading it masks a juvenile as a brutal killer is society's eyes. These statements should be brought to the people who are disagreeing with the court decision, and prove that these minors do not deserve an adult sentence with life in prison.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Recently, the United States Supreme Court has decided to hear a Florida case, Sullivan v. State, 987 So.2d 83 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008), where a minor received a life without parole sentence in a conviction for rape.3 This note will analyze the Sullivan case and predict how the Court will likely rule. There are two dimensions that this note will discuss: First, the Eighth Amendment jurisprudence of the United States Supreme Court regarding proportionality in sentencing. And second, the Court’s treatment of minors under the Eight Amendment’s “cruel and unusual” clause.…

    • 3052 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miller vs Alabama

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Supreme Court reviewed the constitutionality of mandatory life sentences without parole enforced upon persons aged fourteen and younger found guilty of homicide. The court declared unconstitutional a compulsory sentence of life without parole for children. The states have been barred from routinely imposing sentences based on the crime committed. There is a requirement for individual consideration of the child life circumstance or the defendant status as a child. The court rejected the definite ban on life sentences without parole. This is because in some cases the instances may be uncommon, but jurors can find irreparably corrupted children. The Supreme Court declined to decide the subject whether there is age below which children with life sentences without parole is unconstitutional.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper will examine the history of the Juvenile Court system and its intended purposes, the history of capital punishment being used against minors, court decisions both in limiting capital punishment for youthful offenders, as well as upholding states rights to sentence juveniles to death. Most importantly, we will analyze possible factors that contributed to the decision of Roper v Simmons such as the international community's opposition of the juvenile death penalty and the majority consensus of the American public in outlawing this practice.…

    • 3690 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juveniles who commit heinous crimes are capable of change, so convicting them as adults and giving them a life sentence doesn't allow them to do so. In Gail Garinger’s, “Juveniles Don't Deserve Life Sentences”, Garinger states the the 79 juveniles in the US who are convicted to a life sentence, are seen as unchangeable and no one cares what becomes of them. But from personal experiences of being a former judge, Garinger had see first hand the juvenile's capacity to turn themselves around. If a juvenile were to be convicted to die in prison, they would be never be given the opportunity to show their change. They should be given an opportunity to show their growth and maturity, but life in prison denies them that. Life in prison denies these young individuals the access to…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On June 25, 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that juveniles who committed murder could not be sentenced to life in prison. A few justices believed life in prison without parole for a juvenile prevents consideration for their chronological age and its features. But four justices disagreed saying that heinous crimes committed by juveniles should be punished with a sentence of life in prison, or a 17-year-old would be released to society after he had gun down his fellow classmates and teachers. I disagree with the Supreme Court ruling. I believe that every juvenile who has committed a heinous crime should be sentenced to life in prison without parole. The victims of the crime would get the justice they deserve, they are at the age where they should know what they are doing, and brain development does not play a fact to juveniles committing heinous crimes .…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Juveniles shouldn't get sentenced to life without parole for committing a crime at a young age. A punishment is necessary but, sentenced to life without parole at a young age is devastating. Why should they even continue to live? They are young and deserve a second chance to rehabilitate. All we do is just throw these kids in prison and forget about the. What these kids need is treatment especially, those raised in violet environments. Sometimes they grow up unaware of what's good or bad. It may not be there fault. I'm not stating that they don't deceive a punishment, what the need is a punishment but also the support of a person.…

    • 1120 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order for juveniles to fully understand the affects and consequences to what they have committed, adult sentencing is a better and effective consequence. This is because juvenile sentencing is too lenient for kids and youths who commit heinous crimes. For example, “little girls who rob a bank was given a 26-years-to-life prison term,”(56) stated Margie Lundstrom in “Kids Are Kids-Until They Commit Crimes”. The sentencing of 26 years to life was understandable because these were little girls committing a…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Much controversy exists on the question of whether a juvenile criminal should be punished to the same extent as an adult. Those who commit capitol crimes, including adolescents, should be penalized according to the law. Age should not be a factor in the case of serious crimes. Many people claim that the child did not know any better, or that he was brought up with the conception that this behavior is acceptable. Although there is some truth to these allegations, the reality of this social issue is far more complex. Therefore we ask the question, Should childhood offenders of capitols crimes be treated as adults?…

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Despite the fact that in America we incarcerate more juveniles for life terms than in any other country in the world, that truth is that the vast majority of youth offenders will one day be released. The question is simple and stark. Do we want to help them change or do we want to help them become even more violent and dangerous?” by Ayelet Waldman. The quote points out that the U.S. punishing juveniles by putting them in jail for lifetime more than any other countries around the world can be harmful and also helpful as the same time. Many states have also tried the method in a purpose of decreasing the crimes rate and as it has worked in some places, there are also some unexpected results over some places. A punishment of life without parole for juvenile criminals has become a big matter between people. Proponents argue that the plan is helpful and it has decreased the crimes rate over some places while opponents argue that punishments do only little change to behavior.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Naturalism and the environment have the ability to change the brain’s of many lives. “ Murderers from relatively benign backgrounds are more likely to have reduced activity in two key brain areas than murderers from home wracked by conflict, deprivation and abuse,”…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    German Singer Q’orianka Kilcher once stated this quote about juveniles. “I think it's important for us as a society to remember that the youth within juvenile justice systems are, most of the time, youths who simply haven't had the right mentors and supporters around them - because of circumstances beyond their control.” This quote approaches one of America’s biggest question about juvenile justice. Should minors who have committed heinous crimes against the American Society be tried like an adult and given punishments like life in prison? This question was answered in a Supreme Court ruling that stated juveniles couldn’t be sentenced life in prison because minors were still minors, regardless of their crimes. However, despite this ruling,…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the most controversial issues in the rights of juveniles today is addressed in the question, Should the death penalty be applied to juveniles? For nearly a century the juvenile courts have existed to shield the majority of juvenile offenders from the full weight of criminal law and to protect their entitled special rights and immunities. In the case of kent vs. United states in 1996, Justice Fortas stated some of these special rights which include; Protection from publicity, confinement only to twenty-one years of age, no confinement with adults, and protection against the consequences of adult conviction such as the loss of civil rights, the use of adjudication against him in subsequent proceedings and disqualification of public employment (Kent vs. US 1966:1055). These special rights and immunities exist so that the justice courts can provide measures of guidance and rehabilitation for the child along with protection for society. However, there are some youths who are extremely dangerous and do not respond to attempts to reform themselves. The question is, should established mechanisms for transferring or waiving juvenile court jurisdiction in these exceptional cases take away these special rights and subject the youth to the full range of penalties for criminal behavior including, in some jurisdictions, execution (Thomson vs. State, 1986:784) ? Should These juveniles who perform the same malicious acts as some adult capital offenders be subject to the harshness of the criminal courts and the finality of the death penalty ? This paper will discuss a history of capital punishment for juveniles in the United States, methods of transferring juvenile cases to criminal courts, and also my position on the subject and justice of justice of juveniles and the death penalty. The constitutionality of the juvenile death penalty reached a settlement in 1988 in the case of Thompson v. Oklahoma when four Supreme Court Justices reached the conclusion that: persons under…

    • 2058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juvenile Justice

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Science has been used to mitigate the types and severity of punishments that a juvenile receives. In terms of cognitive development, teens are far from development, discusses Thompson, a professor of neurology at UCLA; in his article “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains”. “The biggest surprise in recent teen-brain research is the finding that a massive loss of brain tissue occurs in the teen years” (4), this loss of brain tissue affects self-control which then leads to violent acts, rash actions, and impulses. This research can be used as evidence that teens are not yet adults in terms of cognitive development, therefore, the legal system should not treat them as such.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays