Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Justification of Punishment

Powerful Essays
1116 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Justification of Punishment
Justification of Punishment 1 Justification of Punishment Sociology 120 Derek Goodson April 7, 2009 Justification of Punishment 2 There are four different types of punishment that have been put in place over the years in order to deter crime in society; these four types are retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, and societal protection. These four different types of punishment have raised many questions in today’s society. The changes in today’s society have brought into question the effectiveness of each one of these types of punishment and whether or not they are effective in the way that they were initially put into place for. We will examine each type of punishment in order to see which one is the most effective in deterring crime in today’s society. We will also take this chance to decide if these punishments actually provide any benefits to either the criminals that they are put in place for or for society whom these punishments are put in place to protect. The first justificationof punishment that we will discuss is that of retribution. Retribution is the moral vengeance to satisfy a society’s need of an offender to suffer as much suffering as they have caused. Retribution is the oldest type of punishment that has been used in society. Retribution dates back to the beginning of punishment in modern society. Retribution was designed to give society moral closer for a person’s actions. Ultimately, retribution is the closest justification of punishment to the old saying in the bible “eye for an eye and tooth for a tooth”. The second justification of punishment is deterrence. Deterrence is an attempt to discourage the act of crime by the use of punishment. Deterrence is a form of punishment that uses examples of different punishments that have been used in the past in order to keep someone from committing a criminal act. This justification is based on the fact that when someone sees what could happen to them if they commit a crime that it will keep them from committing that crime in order to not receive that punishment. In the old west lynching and public hangings were forms of deterrence to keep people from committing crimes. Justification of Punishment 3 The next justification of punishment is rehabilitation. Rehabilitation is based on the fact that if an individual is incarcerated for a crime then while in prison they will receive classes that will teach them how not to commit the same crime when they are released, as well they are able to receive training in a job so when they are released they have a future ahead of them that does not include a criminal life. Rehabilitation has become the standard justification of punishment for most of the modern world because society sees the previously used justifications of punishment as unjust and unnecessary. Social Protection is the final justification for punishment. Social protection is based on the thought of removing an offender from the society in which they committed the offense. Social protection differs from rehabilitation because there are no special programs put in place for an offender to have a chance to change they are either locked up in prison or they are executed for more horrific crimes. In American society we currently use the last three justifications. The justification of deterrence is used with young offenders including first time offenders and under age offenders who are too young to enter into the prison system or youth detention centers. We as a society use the justification of rehabilitation for many of the offenders that are in our prison systems these days. Most people in today’s society believe that those individuals that have committed crimes against society deserve a second chance and therefore believe that rehabilitation is the best option for offenders. When it comes to my opinion I feel that the best justification for punishment is that of Retribution. I believe that when it comes to lowering the amount of criminal acts that take place in American society Retribution would put fear into people when they see what could happen if they commit a crime against someone in American society. I look to our countries history as well as the history of countries in Europe that used retribution when a crime was committed. Take for example in mid evil Europe when Justification of Punishment 4 an individual would steal from another person or a store they would have their hand cut off and then that person would be known as a thief. Probably the most well known use of retribution was not even an actual event and is not even a crime in today’s society, the book The Scarlet letter shows us a wonderful example of retribution so that the person is humiliated and also it would show other individuals what would happen to them if they committed the crime of adultery. The consequences of certain punishments do provide benefits to both criminals and society. Retribution provides benefits to both parties in some cases. As long as the offender is not being put to death then theywill hopefully take the embarrassment of the punishment and make sure that they don’t commit an offense again. Society benefits from retribution because this justification will more than likely keep others from committing the same crime that the offender is being punished for. Deterrence benefits criminals because this is their opportunity to actually keep from doing a crime. Rehabilitation is the most beneficial to a criminal because it gives them an opportunity to better themselves and return to society a better person and take a second chance at new life in which they can put the bad things they have done before behind them. Social Protection protects society just like it says in the name because it completely removes the offender from society and therefore society is not at risk to be assaulted by these offenders again. These four different justifications of punishment that have been used over the years have both their pros and cons, but they have been effective in their use in American society. Though not all of these justifications of punishment are used on a regular basis in American society in this day and age there are situations that still arise in which they are. There are many situations in which there are multiple justifications used in order to punish an individual that has committed an offense against Justification of Punishment 5 Society. Much like the justice system that has been put in place in American society these may not be the best justifications of punishment that could be used but they are the only ones in place at this time.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The criminal justice system has many objectives which it intends to achieve through various punishments. One such objective is to deter social deviants by threatening them with the possibility of facing harsh punishment to pay for their crimes (Ferris & Stein, 2016). The criminal justice system also achieves retribution by responding to crime by retaliating or revenging the crime. The criminal justice system also incapacitates social deviants so as to protect members of the society through imprisonment or execution in some cases. Additionally, the system also intends to rehabilitate criminals so as to encourage them to refrain from socially deviant…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “Punishment, a necessary evil, is sometimes required to deter law violators from repeating their crime and to serve as an example to others who would also violate the law.” (Schmalleger. 2011. P.81)…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Punishment is described by the Webster Dictionary as ‘the infliction or imposition of a penalty as retribution to an offense’. Today, this definition may pass as true for many governments, but years ago when philosophers were discussing ideas about government and laws, one idea that stuck out was that of punishment. Different theories rose regarding justifying punishment, and deciding the purpose behind punishing people. Joel Feinberg, Jules Coleman, and Christopher Kutz are three philosophers that spent a lot of time discussing their beliefs and ideas about punishment.…

    • 859 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Such deterrence emanates from life experiences with any further crime. However, if an individual is in fear to what punishment there is it is a possibility that it will only prevent him/her from committing a similar crime. A juvenile is set up to be punished by the state authorities’ knowing of their ordeal future misbehavior. An example of specific deterrence can be seen as the impact of the actual legal punishment on those who are apprehended. Specific deterrence can result from actual experiences with detection, prosecution, and punishment of…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As previously mentioned, if the punishment is not harsh enough the result is repeated offense. If a criminal relishes in committing a crime and the court system does not properly punish them for it, then they actually have no reason not to repeat the crime over again. The National Institute of Justice, part of the U.S department of Justice, studied how likely criminals are to relapse after being released, claiming that “Within five years of release, about three-quarters (76.6 percent) of released prisoners were rearrested” (Durose, Cooper, and Howard). This statistic proves that there is a significant chance that a criminal will indeed carry out the same action as before. The most significant way that an offender is punished is through what…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sentences for crimes committed have been handed down for as long as there have been crimes to commit. There are many factors to be considered by the judge tasked with sentencing in a criminal case, including an offender’s criminal history and actual involvement in the commission of the offense. First-time offenders may be grated leniency in sentencing, but it can be argued that such a practice is contrary to the nature of punishment and detracts from the effects of the crime on the victims. Punishment serves three general purposes that serve to benefit the victim, the public, and the offender: retribution, prevention, and rehabilitation.…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    a general system of punishment, the punishment of specific persons, and the specific type (and amount) of punishment to be imposed in a given scenario (Duff). With respect to the first component, which he called the “general justifying aim” of the system of punishment (Duff), there are several purposes for instituting a penal system; the most common of which are general deterrence, specific deterrence, incarceration/incapacitation, rehabilitation, and retribution. While it is easy to see how each of these can be beneficial and justify the general punishment system in the abstract, upon closer examination the existence of multiple underlying justifications…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cja/234 Sentencing Paper

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Earlier responses to crime were to be brutal, which included torture, humiliation, mutilation, and branding. These kinds of punishments often attempted to relate the punishment to the crime, as close as possible. The first response to crime incorporated linking criminal acts to sin and developing strict punishments. Throughout the years, this thought process has changed into a more humane system. The reason for corrections to is to protect the society but also to provide rehabilitation to these individuals. Punishments for criminals now include main objectives that widely differ from the first believed aspects of punishments. Punishments now embrace objectives pertaining to deterrence, incarceration, rehabilitation, retribution and restitution.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Exam 4 Study Guide Sentencing 1. The 5 philosophies of purpose of punishment (purposes, examples, pros and cons): a. Deterrence (specific and general) b. Incapacitation c. Retribution d. Rehabilitation e. Restorative Justice 2. Corporal Punishment 3. History of punishment- banishment, sterilization, transportation 4.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Purpose and History

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Let’s first begin with what punishment means. Punishment is the infliction or imposition of a penalty as retribution for an offense. While completing my research I was able to stumble across two definitions that caught my attention. The general definition for punishment is “aversive stimulus that follows an undesirable behavior, and is intended to decrease or eliminate the occurrence of that behavior. It may be triggered either due to the performance of an undesirable act (negligence) or the non-performance of a desirable act (disobedience). Punishments take the form of presentation of an unpleasant stimulus (criticism or warning) or withdrawal of a pleasant one (employment or promotion). Threat of punishment usually also constitutes a punishment”. The definition of punishment pertaining to the law is “Confinement, fine, penalty, sanction, or loss of a privilege, property, or right, assessed and administered as deterrence or retribution by an authorized court to an entity duly convicted of violating the law of the land”. [ (Buisness Dictionary, 2013) ] Punishments must be adequate match the reasons why the crimes were committed. History shows that Cesare Beccarua who was an Italian theorist, first suggested linking crime causation to punishments in the eighteenth century. He is known as the founder of the Classical School of criminology. The classical School is the theory linking crime causation to punishment, based on offenders’ free will and…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy Of Sentencing

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The complexities of human nature, emotions, thought, morals and ethics have been debated for centuries, and the dilemma of sentencing another human to a form of corporal punishment, incarceration or death, requires a firm foundation in the laws of the land, tempered by years of study and dedication to the law one has sworn to uphold. The several reasons for sentencing of a crime is: Revenge, for an actual or perceived need for vengeance on a violation, usually one that is very personal and emotional in nature. Incapacitation, which is to prevent the criminal from repeating crimes against society by placing them into a correctional facility on a long term or permanent basis. Restoration, is a form of sentencing when the convening authority is attempting to protect the victims by helping them to feel safe and secure. Deterrence is a sentence where the courts attempt to prevent the subject of a crime from offending again. Retribution, which is probably the oldest reason for sentencing was utilized for equal punishment to the crime, drawing from the old adage “eye for an eye”. Lastly is the sentence of rehabilitation, which in societies modern view, the ideal and preferred sentence,…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Indeterminate Sentencing

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Several different objectives exist in sentencing, including “deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation and retribution” (2012). Retribution is a sentencing objective that has proven to be the most effective in…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Criminal sentencing in America has long been guided by one of several different major philosophies of punishment, including retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, and rehabilitation (Spohn, 2000). Retributive sentences involve punishments intended to exact revenge, in line with the biblical idea of “an eye for an eye.” This is based on the belief that some behaviors are unconditionally wrong and therefore justified of punishment. From this perspective, sentences should be equal with the harm done to society. Deterrence, on the other hand, involves a more practical basis for sentencing. It is based on the concept that crime is easily chosen as the result of a rational cost-benefit examination. Individuals will engage in crime when the benefits…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Goals Of Sentencing

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The sentencing phase of the criminal justice process is where a guilty offender is sanctioned for his conduct. The goals of sentencing include retribution, rehabilitation, deterrence, and incapacitation. Historically the primary goal has varied by criminal justice era and the crime committed. However, each sentencing goal has a specific purpose (Masters, et al., 2017). The sentencing goal of retribution is normally pursued in heinous crime cases. Its aim is to castigate the offender. In contrast, rehabilitation is a sentencing goal that seeks to correct offender conduct, by teaching offenders, skills that aid in the prevention of recidivism. On the other hand, the sentencing goal of deterrence seeks to discourage future criminality by way of…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How many times have we watched the news and the headline story involves a man being arrested for a violent crime? And let’s say that the crime is forcible rape. Our first thoughts are, “Oh man, they need to castrate that joker!” or “They need to put that guy in the same cell with Big Bubba!” Don’t lie! We have all had those thoughts. We especially take offense if the crime involves a child, an elderly person, or a disabled person.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays