Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Justice for Juveniles- No Death Penalty

Good Essays
930 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Justice for Juveniles- No Death Penalty
Justice for Juveniles
Capital punishment is the ultimate punishment that can be received by a convicted criminal in a capital offence. Capital punishment ultimately means the convicted criminal will be executed upon their execution date given to them by a court of law. Today, only 33 states allow the death penalty and after the Supreme Court case of Roper v. Simmons (2005), no states allow the death penalty for children under the age of 18 at the time of the crime. Juvenile offenders typically have some sort of obstacles that keep them from acting maturely or as a law-abiding citizen. These obstacles could be mental issues, lack of education, or financial pressures to help their family. These are things that can be fixed and thus, save a child’s life when they have acted out illegally, which is why this is a sanctity of life issue. A child’s life is very delicate and sacred. It is important that we continue to make capital punishment for juveniles under 18 illegal because it has been proven to be inhumane due to a juvenile’s incomplete biological structures and ultimately these juveniles should be held liable to the Juvenile Justice System and should be offered pro-social opportunities to get away from and learn from these poor decisions.
The main argument held against juveniles sentenced to capital punishment, or execution is the March 2005 Supreme Court case Roper v. Simmons. The Supreme Court ruled that capital punishment was not to be given to any person who had committed a capital offence under the age of 18. The Supreme Court felt that this punishment for juveniles would fall under cruel and unusual punishments and was then eliminated from the Constitution. The Supreme Court felt that the juvenile’s Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment would be jeopardized if given execution. The fact that the Supreme Court has made it clear it is inhumane to execute a juvenile, this ruling should be upheld.
The Supreme Court’s decision to eliminate the death penalty for those who committed an act under the age of 18 was also decided upon reasoning that youth do not all reach the same maturity levels at equal times. Some juveniles are more mature, intelligent, and emotionally capable of handling different situations than others. In other words, children 18 years and younger are not categorized as adults because they do not function as adults. Juveniles under 18 are not given the same rights as adults. For example, anyone under 18 is unable to vote, unable to join the military, and they are unable to sit on a jury to decide the fate of someone else’s poor decision. With this being said, it is unreasonable to allow a child under 18 to be executed due to poor decisions when they are not even categorized as a normal functioning adult. To be more scientific, researchers at UCLA’s Department of Neuroscience found that the location in the brain that regulates impulse control and judgment does not mature or fully develop until 18 and 22 years old, which means that anyone under 18 is not even biologically done maturing. This would give a definite reason as to why children or teenagers act out on poor judgment and poor decisions.
The lack of biological growth does not give an excuse for juveniles to act out or commit illegal acts. Juveniles should not just get away with their crimes, they should be held liable. The Juvenile Justice System is the final argument to this case. The Juvenile Justice System was created to rehabilitate juveniles and deter them from committing more illegal acts in the future. The Justice System leans toward rehabilitation rather than punishment because juveniles are not adults, rather, must be taught and reprimanded instead of just punished. Today, different cities and states fund diverse programs to help juveniles get out of bad environments or situations. In Harris County (Houston, TX), the Juvenile Justice System holds gang court on Friday mornings to talk to juveniles involved with gang life. The judge, social worker/probation officer, defense attorney, and assistant district attorney will sit in an office and allow 5-10 juveniles to come and talk about their involvement with the gang they are affiliated with and other potential options for the juvenile. Many of the juveniles express that they want out of the gang life and they need help but have no way of getting it. This is where after school or weekend programs come into play. Harris County has after school tutoring, free transportation to and from, and fun activities that the juveniles could turn to instead of gang activities. The Juvenile Justice System allows so many phenomenal opportunities that can be given to at risk juveniles that capital punishment should not even be an option.
There should be a clear call to action on the defense of juveniles regarding capital punishment. Children are very important because they are the future of our world. These juveniles are the next President and Vice President of the United States, they are the next police officers, veterans, and parents to our society and culture. It is important to protect and teach lawfully our constitution and amendments to them. With this being said, it is important to protect the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment and ultimately protect and teach our juveniles so that they may grow into successful, law-abiding citizens. It is up to society and communities to help donate their time, effort, or donations to programs that help keep juvenile offenders out of negative environments and continuously keeping busy with pro-social activities.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Juvenile Justice

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In recent discussion of Juvenile Justice, a controversial issue has been whether juveniles should be tried as adults in adult courts for heinous crimes they have committed. On one hand, some argue that they should not be tried as adults and do not deserve harsh sentences but as children seeking help. On the other hand, however, others argue that those who commit such heinous crimes ought to be punished no matter the age. The juvenile court was created to handle juvenile offenders on the basis of their youth rather than their crimes. The purpose of juvenile court is treatment and guidance rather than punishment. Juveniles don't have the knowledgeable or moral capacity to understand the consequences of their actions; similarly, they lack the same capacity to be trial defendants. Juveniles today are more knowledgeable and cultured at a younger age; they understand the implications of violence and how violent weapons are used. It is irrational to argue that a juvenile, who sees the effect of violence around him in the news every day, does not understand what killing really is. The fact that “adolescent killers” know how to load and shoot a gun or use a knife to kill is an indicator that they understand exactly what they're doing.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    On June 25, 2012, the Supreme Court had ruled that juveniles who committed a crime such as murder, could not be sentenced to life in prison because it is violating the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment. In the supreme court decision, I agree that it is harsh and should not be allowed for a minor to serve life in prison, even if murder is committed. The decision is agreeable due to the severe punishment on someone young whose life is ruined over the decision they made. The information on a minor is misleading it masks a juvenile as a brutal killer is society's eyes. These statements should be brought to the people who are disagreeing with the court decision, and prove that these minors do not deserve an adult sentence with life in prison.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roper vs. Simmons was one of the few cases in almost two decades to address whether it’s constitutional under the eighth and fourteenth amendments to execute a juvenile offender who was over the age of fifteen but under the age of eighteen when he/she committed a capital crime. In 1988, Thompson vs. Oklahoma banned the execution of minors who were sixteen years of age when they committed a capital crime. Another case, Stanford vs. Kentucky (1989), divided the court which eventually rejected that the Constitution excludes capital punishment for minors of this age group. Roper vs. Simmons overturned the decision in Stanford vs. Kentucky. Only seven countries in the past century have favored execution of minors convicted of capital crimes: Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia,…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Virginia (2002) when the Supreme Court ruled it was unconstitutional to execute the mentally retarded, there has been a shift in the use of the juvenile death penalty that reflects society’s “evolving standards of decency.” A national consensus has developed since Stanford v. Kentucky (1989) in which the majority of states do not support the use of the death penalty for juveniles. Currently, 30 states prohibit the juvenile death penalty, and 12 of those states have banned the death penalty completely. In addition, since 1989, five states that previously allowed the juvenile death penalty have banned its use, either through legislation or through judicial…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miller vs Alabama

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Supreme Court reviewed the constitutionality of mandatory life sentences without parole enforced upon persons aged fourteen and younger found guilty of homicide. The court declared unconstitutional a compulsory sentence of life without parole for children. The states have been barred from routinely imposing sentences based on the crime committed. There is a requirement for individual consideration of the child life circumstance or the defendant status as a child. The court rejected the definite ban on life sentences without parole. This is because in some cases the instances may be uncommon, but jurors can find irreparably corrupted children. The Supreme Court declined to decide the subject whether there is age below which children with life sentences without parole is unconstitutional.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roper Vs Simmons Essay

    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the 2005 case Roper v. Simmons, the supreme court ruled that any individual who is under the age of 18 when he commits a crime cannot be sentenced to the death penalty because it does not stand with the nation’s ‘evolving standard of decency.’ Roper v. Simmons is in very close relation to the case Graham v. Florida. Graham established the principle that no minor can be sentenced to life without parole unless they committed a homicide, and further reduced the harshest punishment a minor can receive. The interpretation of the 8ths amendment has changed much between the 1900s and early…

    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people around the nation have different views on the subject of juvenile justice. Some believe that despite the children's age, they should still be tried as an adult if a serious crime is committed. On the other hand, some believe children should not be tried as adult even if they commit a rather serious crime. I firmly that these children should not be sentenced to life in prison despite the serious crime that they have committed and should have another shot at life when their brain is fully developed.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the documentary, “Criminal Kids Life Sentence, Children in Prison Documentary”, published on Youtube in 2016, discusses about the cruelty death row punishment kids faced in the United States Juvenile Justice System before the year 2010, and still do if the crime is any higher than murder now.. “The United States is the only country in the world that condemns children for life in prison.” quoted as part of the documentary. The social problems addressed in this documentary include juvenile delinquency, low-income families, kids becoming a part of the govt. debtors’ prison, criminology, and corruption in our justice system. The major theoretical approaches conflict theory, “which emphasizes the role of coercion and power in producing social…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Criminal Law Paper

    • 1806 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The legal issue present in this case is if sentencing a 14-year-old to life in prison without parole is considered as cruel and unusual punishment. Miller appealed his case on the grounds that his conviction violated both the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. To back his claims, Miller presented the cases of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551, 560, which holds that "a minor cannot be sentenced to death and that a minor cannot be imprisoned for life for a non-homicidal crime, respectively, as evidence that his conviction contravenes nationally held standards of decency" (Cornell University Law School, 2012).…

    • 1806 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Earlier this year the Supreme Court of the United States handed down arguably one their most important, yet controversial decisions regarding juvenile law. In the case Roper v Simmons (2005), a narrow 5-4 decision, overturned the United States practice of allowing capital punishment for juvenile offenders.…

    • 3690 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are multiple reasons that allow individuals to have their own opinions considering children and how they should be treated and tried in criminal cases. Many people today believe that teenagers should not be tried to mandatory life in prisons because their brains are not fully developed to make wise decisions which means they lack common sense. While others believe juveniles should be sentenced to mandatory life in prison because teenagers have plenty of common sense and at their age can identify right from wrong and are also aware of the consequences that they will encounter. I believe juveniles should not be tried to mandatory life in prison for their heinous crimes because they are still underdeveloped and are less mature compared to…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    5.5-4 Juvenile Shootings

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Roper vs. Simmons (2005) the verdict was to determine the minimum age for capital punishment, cruel and unusual punishment, and the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment. They wanted to decide was it permissible under the Eighth and Fourteenth amendments to the Constitution of the United States to execute a juvenile offender who was older than 15 but younger than 18 when they committed a capital crime. The Supreme Court stated the gravity of capital punishment and its application “Capital punishment must be limited to those offenders who commit a narrow a category of the most serious crimes’ and whose extreme culpability makes them the most deserving of execution.” The Court further stated that juveniles are different because they are “more vulnerable or susceptible to negative influences and outside pressures, including peer pressure”; and that “that the character of a juvenile is not as well formed as that of an adult.” (CaseBriefs, 2005) Justice Kennedy, who was writing for the majority,…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Juvenile Justice has been a prominent controversy in present day society. We can observe how the majority of crimes committed are being perpetrated by adolescents. The disputation arises on whether the Supreme Court justice should abolish mandatory life in prison for pubescents who commit the immorality of murder or authorize the punishment with parole. Although many can challenge this contrary issue, I concur with ideology of the Supreme Court ruling that juveniles who engage in murder could not be sentenced to life in prison due to the protection the 8th amendment granting defense from cruel and unusual punishment.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the Supreme Court ruled is as a “cruel and unusual punishment,” the sentence if fair because the convicted committed an act of murder that took away another person’s life. Such an example is Greg Ousley, who purposely murdered his parents and planned the murder days before he committed it (Greg Ousely Is Sorry, 9). Unlike previous scenarios mentioned, Ousley purposely planned for the murder of his parents. Despite the fact that he was still a teenager when he committed the murder, he had an intention to silence his parents and killed both of them in cold blood. This greatly differs from the previous convicted juveniles who accidentally killed their victims. Juveniles that have motives such as Ousley should be convicted as an adult and be sentenced a life in prison because, despite their age, they can think and act like an adult. Because of this, the Supreme Court’s decision of disallowing “teenagers” from “cruel and unusual punishments” should be overturned on certain cases, because, as seen in Ousely, some teenagers are capable and can plan murders beforehand. This not only reveals that certain teenagers can plan beforehand, but that they can think like adults in order to murder someone with…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The topic about executing Juveniles legally is an unsure topic, which is very discussable. The first know killed Juvenile offender, happened in 1642. He was legally executed, his name is Thomas Graunger. Since that execution 361 individuals have since gotten the death penalty There is a lot of arguing about this topic and people can´t get to a solution, this works out for everybody. There are people for keeping the death penalty for juveniles offenders and then there are those against as well.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics