Justice as Fairness

Justice As Fairness John Rawls made a significant difference in the way society views justice. He wanted people to keep in mind that his persuading arguments on the principles of justice come from the original hypothetical positions. The liberties he claims rational self interested people would include were things such as religion and the freedom of speech. He didn’t like the idea of utilitarianism for the reason of it leaving the minorities “destitute” and without help”. He also said that if we were to look at situations behind a “veil of ignorance”, that shields us from knowing our advantages and disadvantages, then we would indefinitely choose equality. Social and economic inequalities are the second principle of justice, which, concerns social and economic equality. This only recognizes the theory of good and right in the difference between the principles and utilitarianism because it does not require an equal distribution of welth. The framework for morality, law, and politics is utilitarianism. Pleasure and preferences of satisfaction also gives reference to whatever yields the greatest utility and the greatest values with a list of objectives. It allows a choice of actions on the basis of consequences, and a view of consequences in means of the well being of others. The theory of rights yields the moral sensitivity to others and the greatest net utility. It also deals with negativity. The negatives require a person to promote the least amount whereas utilitarianism deals with the greatest number of goods for the greatest number. Evil and harm is the least amount. The suggestion from the principle of utilitarianism is that the main aim of the negative utilitarianism was to give rise to the least painful method of killing the entity of humanity. Concepts such as reputation rather than pure hedonism may be part of preference satisfaction. The structure and function of criminal justice agencies rest in the three branches of government. Three agency