Justice Antonin Scalia Summary

Justice Antonin Scalia has said in the past regarding abortion that there is nothing in the Constitution that mentions anything about a right to abortion. The Constitution simply states nothing about this issue. One possible way to fix whether there is a female right for women or not is to look at how most rights are created in a democratic society and then either amend the Constitution, or create a law. The Constitution cannot compromise, but a law can because the Constitution as Justice Scalia believed is a document that is meant to hinder and restrain from change. The Constitution is our supreme law of the land, and it is not and should not be meant to encourage or make change happen.
It can be argued that the Supreme Court is very much influenced by public opinion. If the Court were in fact influenced by public opinion, then it would be dependent on what the people think. Being concerned about what the people think is important, but this can make the Court seem just as political as congress and the president. As a
She remains strong because she is notorious and because she believes that she has the potential to continue influencing the Court. I admire RBG’s strength and hope that she is able to serve on the Court for as long as she is able to do so because her love for the work she does is quite evident through all that she has done for our society. And even though Justice Scalia’s ideology is different than it is to that of Justice Ginsburg, I think that one thing that they have in common is their ability to boldly argue cases. When they, as an example, intend to write a dissent on an issue, they do it strategically both laying out the cons and stating why or how the Court decided