Preview

Justice According To Rawls Analysis

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1431 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Justice According To Rawls Analysis
1.2.Definition of Justice according to Rawls.
The notion of justice is very important as it affect every rational being in all sectors of life, regardless of faith, race, creed for the fact that it is the moral and political concept. “The origin of the word justices comes from Latin, jus which means right or law.” In a simple sense of the word, justice would mean someone who typically doing who is morally right and is disposed to giving someone his or her due. The word fair can be used as synonym as we will study justice as fairness in a separate section. Moreover the thinkers especially the philosophers wanted to get beyond the horizons of normal etymology of study on justice to consider the nature of justice in reference to moral virtue
…show more content…
In the development of his investigation, Rawls answers specific moral questions. In his conception, Rawls identifies that “Justice is the virtue of social institution.” The institution that Rawls speaks here is not to be understood as college or university and organization like the international monetary fund but he refers to as, “the practices and the rule that structure relationship and interactions among agents.” The agents is the state or the society of people. If the laws and institution has some defects in matters of justice it can be either abolished or be reformed since each person possess an inviolability that founds on justice. In a just society, the liberty of equal citizenship can be taken as an important aspect with respect to human dignity and value of a person. The rights of each citizen have to be secured and not to be at the disposal of some political gain or fame. Rawls affirmation to this is that “justice is not a subject of political bargain or social interest.” The society of people is an association of people who had their relation to one another in matter of politics, economics, or for historical reasons and they recognize certain rules of conduct that binds them together. In the Political Liberalism published in 1993, Rawls asserts that political conception of justice has three fundamental features which are exemplified by justice as fairness. “The first is the moral conception which is applied to the political, social and economic institutions.” In a simple sense it refers to the basic structure of the society which Rawls termed as original position and is applied to constitutional democracy or democratic regime which are interchangeably used unless otherwise noted for differentiation. The fundamental structure

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    John Rawls’ Fairness Approach is an appropriate ethical framework to use when assessing this dilemma. This approach questions if everyone involved is being treated fairly (is there favoritism and discrimination?). The Fairness Approach examines how fairly or unfairly the actions of an individual or group distribute benefits and burdens everyone else. With this approach, consistency of treatment among persons is key. The only insistence when treatment must differ is if there is a morally relevant difference between people (Andre, Meyer, Shanks, Velasquez, 1989). There are three different kinds of justice -- Distributive, Restorative, and Compensatory. Distributive justice focuses on the benefits and burdens evenly distributed amongst society’s…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Pledge of Allegiance is an honorable and commendable mantra. It concludes with, “one nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all.” Justice in the former reference is inclusive for everyone, an entitlement, granted upon birth. John Rawls position of justice is that “everyone should be treated equally and as fair as possible”. Mr. Rawls position parallels the Egalitarian theory of equality and mutual respect. This isn’t necessarily the practice because contrary to the hope for multiple factors are factored in to the outcome.…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Rawls bases his Theory of Justice on the intuitive conviction that justice as fairness is the first virtue of social institutions. He argues that in order to ensure fair distributions of advantages in society, a workable set of principles are required in order to determine how institutions ought to distribute rights and duties and to establish a clear way to address competing claims to social advantages. The second principle that Rawls develops stipulates that economic and social inequalities are justifiable so long as the requirements of fair equality of opportunity have been met and if they benefit the worst off in society. Rawls argues that the requirement of improving the conditions of the worst off, known as the Difference Principle,…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The question presented here will be whether or not Barack Obama’s plan for health care reform follows the guidelines and principles of philosopher John Rawls’ theory of justice. John Rawls teachings and writings were and still are extremely relevant in the world of political philosophy. Now, the view of many opposing philosophers is that justice should be given based on merit, and this is also the tendency in modern society. Rawls, however, proposed a theory that justice should be based on fairness. He suggested that the laws and principles of society and government should provide equal opportunity to all people. This same philosophy should be used in creating the regulations fro our nations health care plan.…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    John Rawls’ A Theory on Justice establishes standards by which we may evaluate justice in society. In assessing the United States in light of the Rawlsian principles of social justice, it is evident that America falls short of these standards, and yet this discord tolerated in America. While this incongruity does in fact affect the lives of many Americans, particularly the underpriviledged, in practice very little is done to lessen inequality so as to achieve the Rawlsian ideal of social justice in America.…

    • 2769 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Value Of Civil Liberties

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Oxford Dictionary defines Justice as a behavior or treatment based on or behaving according to what is morally right and fair.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The word justice comes from the word just, which means fair. This means that when you do something wrong, you have to accept the consequences for what you did. Every society has there own system of justice. This system has rules and regulations for different types of crimes. We have justice to teach though’s who don't follow the rules a lesson. We have justice to keep people save. We have justice so that revenge doesn’t take over. For example, there is a thief who has been…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Week 3 Justice Theory

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Rawls believes the utilitarian view does not place the necessary emphasis on individuals, and though he agrees with many aspects of contractarianism, he wishes to improve beyond the classic versions of the social contract (Jurik, 2016, p. 7). Consequently, he endeavors to advance the concept of utilitarianism, and marry it with the social contract theory through his inclusions of the “veil of ignorance” perspective and the “difference principle”. Rawls’ terms his overall advancement as, “justice as fairness” (Rawls, 1993, p.48). In his 1993 article, Justice as Fairness, Rawls claims, “justice as fairness, I would now understand as a reasonable, systematic and practicable conception of justice for a constitutional democracy, a conception that offers an alternative to the dominant utilitarianism of our tradition of political thought” (p.…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The virtue of justice is “to establish the parts of the soul in a relation of mastering, and being mastered by, one another that is according to nature, while to produce injustice is to establish a relation of ruling, and being ruled by” . Justice is a virtue contained in the soul, and a soul that is deprived of justice is deprived of excellence. Justice is necessary in a ruling society if flourishing is sought, but it needs to be done in moderation and on a fair…

    • 1821 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    An understanding of true justice is necessary to the ability of a government to be able to impose laws upon a populous and have those people willingly submit. In order to find the most correct version of justice, it is required to find what the origins of justice are. However, in searching for true justice (henceforth known as Justice) a summary of its’ attributes and reasons for each must be given. By examining how Socrates goes about finding the origin of Justice it will be clear what true justice (Justice) is and how this definition came about. The examination of the origin of Justice will be found by examining the separate versions of it individually. The first explanation is put forth by Glaucon. He postulates that justice was created…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Rawls Vs Nozick

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Both John Rawls and Robert Nozick have made major contributions to modern political philosophy. Rawls’ most successful philosophical work, “A Theory of Justice,” has helped construct both modern liberal and social democratic concepts of social justice. On the other hand, “Anarchy, State, and Utopia”, Nozick’s most successful philosophical work, constructs a form of libertarianism traditionally associated with John Locke and other philosophers prescribed to individual rights and freedoms. Evidently, both philosophers exhibit two highly distinct political philosophies. One major difference between the two philosophies is the legitimacy of governmental redistribution of wealth. As a result, Rawls and Nozick are at two opposite ends of the political…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some of life' s most important decisions rely on the concept of justice; however, that idea seems to be a difficult one to define. According to Webster's dictionary, the term justice is the "quality of being just; merited reward or punishment". While this definition may seem abstract, justice must be clearly understood because it plays such an important role in creating the fair society that is so desirable. The many issues of judicial concern that affect that society today, for example the ethical debate between affirmative action and equal opportunity, have intrigued thinkers throughout history as evidenced in Aristotle's Politics: A Definition of Justice.…

    • 970 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Justice in the form of the greater cosmic scheme of life as traditionally thought to be the divine providence and doing justice as fairness stand as two conceptual variants, the latter being more recent.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Justice is central to our law. Most would agree the law should be just, but justice is not easy to define. The concept has been studied by many philosophers all of whom have their own theories of what a just society should be.…

    • 3979 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Statement: A company is planning to develop an app for the parent to monitor their underage children's smartphones. But the company is thoroughly aware of the side effects of the application. According to the parents, this type of application will make their life very comfortable because they don't have to be hovering their children. A person with the wrong intention can also use this app for bad purpose and hurt whosoever he/she wants., By collecting the private information like location, phone calls and many more. Therefore, for the security and privacy, this kind of apps must not be developed by the company.…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays