Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

just war assignment

Good Essays
792 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
just war assignment
Just War Assignment Worksheet

Section 1: Jus ad bellum

1. Summarize the argument that the United States has a just cause for war.

“military operations to disarm Iraq, to free its people and to defend the world from grave danger” (bush 2003)

“Helping Iraqis achieve a United, stable and free country will require our sustained commitment.”(Bush, 2003)

“Saddam Hussein has placed Iraqi troops and equipment in civilian areas, attempting to use innocent men, women and children as shields for his own military” (Bush 2003)

“We have no ambition in Iraq, except to remove a threat and restore control of that country to its own people.” (Bush 2003)

These quotes are the answers George w bush gave to Americans on why this war is just, he states that the united states military is in Iraq to disarm Iraq and defend the world from grave danger he also says that Americans don’t have any ambition in Iraq and they are only going into Iraq to help the “oppressed people”.

2. Is the President indicating that the United States will act with “right intention”? What motives does he give for calling for war?

Yes the quotes above from George w bush’s speech are indicating that the united states is entering Iraq with the right intentions, the motives he gives are that he wants to free the “oppressed Iraq people” and to defend the world from grave danger.

3. How does the President indicate that war is sanctioned by legitimate authority?

“ More than 35 countries are giving crucial support -- from the use of naval and air bases, to help with intelligence and logistics, to the deployment of combat units. Every nation in this coalition has chosen to bear the duty and share the honor of serving in our common defence.” (bush, 2003)

This quote from george w bush shows that it is not just the united states planning an attack on iraq and that 35 other countries around the world are also aiding the united states, this shows that the war is sanctioned by legitimate authority.

4. Does the President mention having tried other measures to keep the peace, and that war is a “last resort”?

No, there are no indications in this speech that there were any other measures taken to avoid going to war and leaving it as a Last resort, this speech indicates that the united states just went straight to war with Iraq.

5. Does the President give any indication of the probability of success in this war?

“Now that conflict has come, the only way to limit its duration is to apply decisive force. And I assure you, this will not be a campaign of half measures, and we will accept no outcome but victory. ” (Bush, 2003)

This is the only indication of the probability of success in the war, George w. bush says that there will be no half measures and the Americans wont stop until they are successful.

6. Does the President indicate that the war will lead to a long-term positive benefit?
No, the president does no indicate this; the only indication of long term positive benefit is when he says he is saving the world from grave danger, which indicates it will cause peace. But there are no other indications of long term positive benefits in this speech.

Section 2: Jus in bello

Section 2

1. Does the President give an indication that this war will be conducted justly?
Summary analysis:
In about 200 words, answer this question below: Explain why, according to President Bush, Operation Iraqi Freedom was a just war.

In this speech president George w. bush gives many examples of why this war “operation Iraqi freedom” is a just war, the title of the operation even suggests that the war is a just war (giving Iraqi’s their freedom). In the beginning of the speech George w bush states “… to free its people and to defend the world from grave danger” (bush 2003) he is saying that the Iraqi government is oppressing its people and that they are going into Iraq to free the people and save the world! And to make the president of Iraq look like an evil person he states “Saddam Hussein has placed Iraqi troops and equipment in civilian areas, attempting to use innocent men, women and children as shields for his own military” (Bush 2003) this leads people to believe that Saddam Hussein is an evil person and the united states is fighting with the right intentions (to get rid of this “evil”). Bush also says “Helping Iraqis achieve a united, stable and free country will require our sustained commitment.”(Bush, 2003) this suggests that the Americans are entering Iraq to fight with the people to help them attain their freedom. These are a few of the things George W. Bush said to justify Operation Iraqi Freedom.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Former President George Bush used a lot of historical fact to justify his argument of invading Iraq. He said things such as: Iraq’s technological abilities, their weapons of mass destruction, and Saddam Hussein’s previous threats against the US. He sounds like he has significant evidence to back up his speech, until he said “Many people have asked how close Saddam Hussein is to developing a nuclear weapon. Well, we don’t know exactly…” This statement only disapproved his previous statements.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "The fact is in my opinion, we have had confusion for years between the White House, the Pentagon, and the battle field. And congress needs to do its job. Now, let's actually have a debate against the authorized use of military force. Let's debate what our soldiers are doing. If we can't define what our soldiers are doing, then this is how we get a decades-long fight, and the American people don't know what is…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

     “Nothing short of total victory is acceptable in Iraq.” © 2012 McGraw-Hill Higher 11 Too vague given the implied context?  “War on Terrorism”…

    • 578 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Bush war cabinet, which is made up of Bush, Condoleezza Rice, Paul Wolfowitz, Colin Powell, George Tenet, Dick Cheney mad Donald Rumsfeld is made of fantasists who want to attack Iraq except Colin Powell who is a stern realist. When there is a showdown with Bush Powell puts the point, which comes to no avail that war should be seen as a last resort were diplomacy has not worked. Here he points out the hypocrisy of Americans where he asks, “people keep asking of Saddam”, “how do we know he’s got weapons of mass destruction? How do we know? Because we’ve still got the…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    President George W. Bush's 9/11 address to America and the rest of the world is one of the most thought provoking and important speeches in history. On September 11, 2001, America was attacked by the Al-Qaeda which is a terrorist group in the middle east. They hijacked our planes and crashed two of them into the World Trade Center towers. Another crashed into the Pentagon and the fourth plane was headed to Washington, D.C., but crashed into a field in Pennsylvania after passengers tried to overtake the hijackers. This attack killed thousands of our U.S citizens and left fear in millions of people's hearts. Yet, President Bush’s purpose of the speech is to bring unity, a sense of peace, and at the same time a stern warning to the attackers of our great land.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euphemisms are used in writing to reduce offenses or disturbances in the audience created by certain words or phrases. Euphemisms are widely used in normal social contexts, the media and even politics. Politicians use euphemisms in their rhetoric to lessen the impact of their words to avoid creating alarm and heighten emotions. Political euphemisms often “sugar coat” the real message and do not give an actual portrayal of the message, in essence understating the facts. In his speech, “Responsibly ending the war in Iraq”, President Obama uses a lot of euphemisms to sound politically correct, to minimize the impact of the war in Iraq and to justify the continued presence of the US military in Iraq. This essay includes a rebuttal of these euphemisms and shows how the euphemisms used downplay certain situations arising from the war, and how they are used to justify the continued occupation of Iraq.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The president can use military power as he decides is essential and proper to shield national security and authorize all relevant United Nations Security chamber resolutions to use force. Before starting war, under obligations Bush had to make accessible to Congress his assurance of circumstances. Indeed, under requirements he had to prove that Iraq was infringing upon UN resolutions by yet being in control of weapons of mass destruction, and furthermore that Iraq was behind the 9-11 assaults. Invading Iraq started before any peaceful resolutions, an alliance between Al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein, and a threat of weapons of mass destruction was proven. In his book, Record emphasizes how the 9/11 Commission reported in 2005 that while there may have been contacts between al Qaeda and the Baathist administration, have seen no proof that these ever formed into a community relationship; nor have we seen confirmation showing that Iraq participated with al Qaeda in creating or completing assaults against the United States” (51). Furthermore, Hussein allowed UN auditors to have access to suspected weapons areas. They reported that there was no proof or conceivable sign of an atomic weapons program in Iraq. Record concludes, Iraq was a choice not because it was a convincing security threat but…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When he told us his opinion about war, I was mightily surprised, because I had thought that he, for he was a war veteran, would be opposed to war more than anyone else. But he said, he thought war was necessary. He didn’t like the idea of war, but he told us, that America had always been like this: “People want to take things from…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The reason we invaded Iraq was for reasons far more than weapons of mass destruction. Saddam Hussein was a tyrant who waged many wars in the Middle East, supported and aided numerous Aab invasions of Israel, threatened to invade Saudi Arabia, overran Kuwait, and caused the UN to bring about sanctions against Iraq. Saddam was also known to have an extensive chemical weapons arsenal and has used several chemical weapons against his own people while suppressing many human…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Just cause: In my opinion, the United States had no right to go into Iraq based solely on a theory that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. According to the Just War Theory, war is permissible only to confront “a real and certain danger," to protect innocent life, to preserve conditions necessary for decent human existence and to secure basic human rights.…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    george washington bush

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages

    President George W. Bush did something very important that has marked the United States hisorty. On March 19, 2003 he announced that war against Iraq had begun. In the primary document : Bush Declares War, the President gives a brief explaintion to the country into why he declared war with Iraq. He begain his justification for the war by explaining to all fellow citizens so everyone was aware. He started off by saying that the "country was in the early stages of military operations to disarm Iraq , to free its people and to defend the world from grave danger". In other words, not to cause harm but to actually defend us.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    THE MORAL PHILOSOPHY IN VIETNAM WAR The moral judgement on the vietnam war is relatively simple: all war is forbidden, the conflict in vietnam is war, therefore the vietnam war is forbidden. From the viewpoint of the “just war” theory, the morality or justice of the vietnam war can be determined only by applying the principles of jus ad bellum and details of vietnam war. There are 6 of the principles of the jus ad bellum: 1. Just Cause: ‘War is permissible only to confront “a real and certain danger” i.e., to protect innocent life, to preserve conditions necessary for decent human existence, and to secure basic human rights.’…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ferguson paper

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Since George H.W. Bush (41) took office in 1989, the United States has intervened in several high-risk situations such as the Gulf War, military deployment in Iraq, and the ongoing War in Afghanistan resulting in thousands of deaths of American soldiers. This is not okay because these soldiers are sons, daughters, brothers, and sisters, of fellow American citizens. Although the President can involve the United States’ military in any situation with the permission of Congress, he should not so if the opposition is a threat. The United States should not be the world’s policeman because foreign affairs require a substantial amount of resources that the U.S. should not let go; more so the United States should focus resources to being a global caregiver.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bush's War In Iraq

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Bush’s war in Iraq has done untold damage to the United States. It has impaired our military power and undermined the morale of our armed forces. Our troops were trained to project overwhelming power. They were not trained for occupation duties.” I completely agree with George Sorors thoughts on the war between the United States and Iraq.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Is War Ethical

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The insurgents’ war is an unethical war. They use tactics of manipulation, deceit and media propaganda to brainwash vulnerable and desperate individuals into becoming suicide bombers. Analyzing these three tactics through events in The Sirens of Baghdad” by Yasmina Khadra with “Eros and Thanatos” by Chris Hedges and “Just War Theory” by Alexander Moseley and then comparing these events to real life stories such as “Abandoned in Iraq; We did our job as interpreters; why has the U.S reneged on its promise?” by Tariq and "Iraq 's Young Blood" by Christian Caryl provide insight.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays