Preview

Just And Unjust In Plato's Republic

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
183 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Just And Unjust In Plato's Republic
In many societies, including our own, we labeled the meaning of the word “justice” for the sole purpose of maintaining social and political stability and order for the good of many instead of the few. However, what we believe to be just and unjust in regards to what Plato’s Republic explains about what is actually just and unjust are inadvertently blurred from a somewhat conflicting (if not unintended biased) perspective. These concepts of thought originate in a hierarchical group of knowledge: understanding, thought, belief, and imagination (Socrates 511e); most of which we use for measuring the ideal implementation of practical and critical forms of theory. What we portray justice in the United States today mostly consists of both opinionated

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    As far back as one looks, society has wrestled with the concept of a Law being unjust or just. Numerous influential people from history such as Plato, Thoreau, and King all have different views on what determines a law to be just, or unjust. Plato describes this as, if one was to see a law an unjust and goes again that law or breaks it then they shall face any consequences given. On the other hand, Thoreau sees as though every individual has the right to determine if a law is Just or unjust. Leaving the individual, the right to resist. While King takes this idea and states, that each person does have the right to resist, but no change can be made by a single person. Instead it takes a mass movement and multiple people collectively coming together…

    • 149 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If a man was not subjected to law or punishment would he choose to do what is considered just? In Plato’s The Republic, Glaucon, one of Socrates’ students, states a common view on justice. Justice is simply a lesser evil when compared to the two extremes which are suffering injustice without power to retaliate and doing injustice without suffering consequences. According to Glaucon, all men are inherently unjust, and only do what is just when forced to do so by law. This view of justice can be seen throughout history when leaders, like Nero, do unjust actions for their own personal gain simply because they are free from any consequences.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    What is the purpose of the city-soul analogy and does it help us understand the nature of justice?…

    • 1949 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Is Socrates Unjust

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. What is the difference between a. and a. Both Socrates and Glaucon ultimately agree that it is better to be actually just and seemingly unjust than it is to be actually unjust but seemingly just. Their reasons for holding this position are because people just have control over themselves. They are able to maintain dominion over their desires, to avoid self indulgence in evil desires, and to choose good things. This is something the unjust person loses no matter how just he may seem.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In book II of Plato’s Republic, there is a discussion between Glaucon, Adeimantus, and Socrates. Glaucon and Adeimantus states that justice belongs to the class of goods, which we welcome for its own sake and for its consequences. Glaucon, then, picks Thrasymachos’ argument, that is better to live an unjust life than just life. In this dialogue, Glaucon challenges Plato to proof why be just is better than being unjust. For Glaucon human being is by nature competitive, for Plato human nature is either good or bad.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates was a man of distinction and a man with strong ideas on how to make a more perfect society. Although a lot of his ideas conflict with his ability to be just or unjust it does not in his mind. Being just or unjust is a major topic in the book and there are many different ways of being both. Socrates used the terms, not necessarily the way we would normally use the term today, but parts of his depiction made sense. He said a lot of different things could be considered unjust. For example not doing what you were Destined to do or what you are best at is considered unjust in his mind.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justice In Beowulf

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Dr. Martin Luther king once said, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere” (Ali B. Ali-Dinar; Ph.D.) Justice! What is justice? The quality of being just; guided by truth reason, justice and fairness. The portrayal of justice is an eternal controversy that has developed over time from ancient civilizations to modern democracies, Not only portrayed overtime but though mediums of media and lit, earlier in the development of literature justice was depicted to be carried out in a more hero fashion meaning a person coming into a conflicting situation and solving the conflict or bring justice to light under his or her conditions therefore adopting a heroes attributes and overall distinction in the public eye as an enforcer of justice…

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Plato's Republic, the protagonist Socrates provides three proofs that a just life is more satisfying than an unjust life. Of the three proofs, The third is the focus of our attention today. It states that “ when the entire soul follows the philosophophic part, there is no civil war in it, each part of it does its own work exclusively and is just, and in a particular it enjoys its own pleasures, the best and truest pleasures possible for it... but when one of the other parts gains control, it won't be able to secure its own pleasure and will compel the other parts to pursue an alien and untrue pleasure” 586e-587a. I believe that the third proof is meant to distinguish between genuine pleasure and the relief of pain.…

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It is my objective in this paper, to illustrate the claims made by Thrasymachus, in The Republic, as argument to Socrates' views on what justice is. I will then evaluate the claims, "justice is nothing other than the advantage of the stronger" (338c), and that "a just man always gets less than an unjust one" (343d), in an effort to see how Thrasymachus uses these statements to provoke an argument. Despite the contradictory nature of these statements, I will attempt to show, through the analyzing of Thrasymachus' speech, that they are actually related. Thrasymachus uses these statements to create an overall picture of his idea of justice to the people in an effort to get Socrates to retract his statements on what justice is. After analyzing these arguments, I will deduce that Thrasymachus' argument is not plausible.…

    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The relationship between justice and the law is one that has been debated for hundreds, if not thousands of years. Many theorists have attempted to explain the exact characteristics of this relationship in order to outline a system of just law. However, this relationship is far too intricate for any one theory to dominate the field. The values used to formulate a system of just law are often times based upon personal preference, unseen biases, or self-motivation. Law is such an intrinsic facet to so many different aspects of life that finding a theory of justice capable of covering the entirety of law is impossible. The fact is that, man has neither the impartialness nor the capability of creating such a complete theory. Without a complete theory for application we are forced into using elements from several theories to debate even the most minuet topics of just law. The issue that arises when using several theories at once is the inherent contradictions that can be found when comparing and contrasting them. Every theory has a theorem which is used to outline its most basic principles. With the vast number of theories it is only rational that contradictions occur.…

    • 2367 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates Unjust

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “The real question is whether the man has been justly slain. If justly, then your duty is to let the matter alone; but if unjustly, then even if the murderer is under the same roof with you and eats at the same table, proceed against him” (Plato 3). This quote from The Trial and Death of Socrates demonstrates acts in themselves are neither unjust nor just, and the perception by the person deciding whether the act is unjust or just, is the determining factor in the matter. In this case, Euthyphro, the man who said this, originally believes the act of murder is unjust, and believes he should in fact proceed against his father, even though in most perceptions it is considered impious; and although Socrates it is considered impious, Euthyphro’s…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the words of Abraham Lincoln in his House Divided Speech, “A house divided against itself cannot stand” (Basler, n.d.). While this is speaking in regards to slavery in the 1800’s, it also relates to establish what is just an unjust when considering the whole of the country. In life, we consistently see humans who live in collaboration that have differing beliefs. Our beliefs are centered on our emotions. Since our laws are based on beliefs and emotions, sometimes the waters will become muddy in that we as a population have different principles.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lastly, one of the many well-known philosophers in history, is Aristotle (384 BC - 322 BC), who believed in more of a natural institution. Aristotle was heavily influenced by Plato, but disagreed with some aspects of his philosophy. However, Aristotle agreed with Plato’s theory, in which humans are political animals, but what sets humans different from animals, is that humans can reason. Hence, this forces people to live according to their reason rather than their passions. The downside of this ideology, is that the thoughts on a particular topic one would have, would be significantly different from other people, thus there reasoning on what is just and unjust can also be different. As a result, if a leader cannot distinguish the wrong in an unjust act, society would not be able to protect people from evil individuals, resulting in a dangerous society to live in. Moving on, Aristotle thought humans fall into one of three…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle on Gender

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As previously discussed from our lectures, Plato's idea of justice was concerned with an internal equality between the members of the classes present within the polis. This focused more on individualism in that one must only be concerned with his/her business and not minding other's problems. The justice that occurs in their society depends on the class to whom one belongs. However, Aristotle, his student, was more for all-encompassing justice aiming for the ultimate goal of the constitution.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Justice is served” is the cliché line heard in courtrooms throughout the world of fantasy. What justice is proves to be more difficult to define. Many definitions state it as an action that is the result or punishment for a negative action. The trouble lies in what defines what is just, the law, society or morality. Plato’s use of Socrates in “Crito” argues that justice is defined as the laws of a city or state as well as what a person’s own perception of justice is. Jean-Baptiste Poquelin Molière’s play Tartuffe argues that justice is both a moral concept as well as a way of reprimanding wrongdoing by a higher political power. Antigone is Sophocles’ description of justice which lies in the social repercussions for those who break the laws…

    • 2061 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays