Preview

jury trial analysis

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1338 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
jury trial analysis
Introduction
The Bill of Rights provides certain rights to criminal defendants during trial. There are two fundamental aspects of the U.S. criminal justice system: The presumption that the defendant is innocent, and the burden on the prosecution to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Assuming the defendant does not plea-bargain, a trial will probably result. Thus, it is important to focus on constitutional rights during the trial stage. The three rights considered in this paper are the right to a speedy trial, the right to an impartial judge, and the right to an impartial jury. Criminal defendants have other rights, too including the right to remain silent, confront witnesses, have a public trial, have a jury trial, have a speedy trial, be represented by an attorney, receive adequate representation, and not be tried twice for the same offense also known as double jeopardy.
Right to a Speedy Trial The Sixth Amendment honors a defendants a right to a "speedy trial." However, it does not insist on a precise time restriction. Thus, judges often have to decide on a case-by-case basis whether a defendant 's trial has been so delayed that the case should be thrown out. In making this decision, judges look at the length of the delay, the reason for the delay, and whether the delay has harmed the defendant 's position. Every jurisdiction has enacted statutes that set time limits for moving cases from the filing of the initial charge to trial. While these statutes are very strict in their wording, most defendants cannot get their convictions reversed on the ground that these statutes were violated.”
“In Barker v. Wingo, the court elaborated on these points: if an accused cannot make bail, he is generally confined, as was the defendant for 10 months, in a local jail. This contributes to the overcrowding and generally deplorable state of those institutions. Lengthy exposure to these conditions “has a destructive effect on human character and makes the rehabilitation of



References: Alschulert, A. (2008) Implementing the Criminal Defendant’s Right to Trial: Alternatives to the Plea Bargaining Worral. J.L. (2012). Criminal Procedure: From first contact to appeal. (4th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Criminal Defendants’ Rights during Trial: The Bill of Rights (2014) Retrieved from http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/defendants-rights-during-court-trial-29793.html Sixth Amendment on the Impartial Jury. (2008) Retrieved from http://constitution.findlaw.com/amendment6/annotation05.html#sthash.CJWuDHBP.dpuf The Role of the Judge (2006) Retrieved from http://www.cscja-acjcs.ca/role_of_judge-en.asp?l=5 Chayes, A. (2000) The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation. The Harvard Law Association Review

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Court Systems Paper

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The court system was formed to separate the innocent from the guilty when a disparity has surfaced or developed. In the criminal justice system everyone is entitled to a fair and unbiased trial. We will be identifying and describing the distinguishing features of the major court system ranging from state level, superior court and federal district court through the U.S. Supreme Court. Second we will discuss the key players, jurisdiction rules, and interpretation on issues and the effect of evolving technologies on the court proceeding at all levels in the court system.…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Criminal Procedure

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Zalman, M. (2008). Criminal procedure: Constitution and society (5th ed.). Upper Saddle, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Apendix D

    • 355 Words
    • 3 Pages

    |Individuals on trial do not have a right to|Individuals on trial have the |There is the ability to negotiate and plea |…

    • 355 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution states: Protects the right to a fair and speedy public trial by jury, including the rights to be notified of accusations, to confront the accuser, to obtain witnesses and to retain counsel. This means the subject has the right to counsel before, during, and after questioning. Should the subject request the presence of an attorney, questioning should cease until counsel arrives.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trials And Verdicts

    • 785 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The constitution is the basis of all criminal law as well as trials and their verdicts. The constitution and the state and federal court systems have been in effect since the nineteenth century. Each and every court case has their own unique processes related to the different courts and how the case made it to any specific one, taking a plea bargain as an alternative to facing trial and what happens to the wrongfully accused will help understand a little more about the ins and outs of trials and verdicts.…

    • 785 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Right to Counsel

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Every individual is afforded the right to counsel in criminal proceedings. It is the liability of the government to provide every defendant facing criminal charges with legal representation that also is considered sufficient (2011). The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees every individual the right to a swift and public trial from an unbiased jury of his or her peers in the state or district in which the crime was committed in (1995-2011). The district should have been beforehand established by law, and to be educated of the nature and reason for the charge, the right to face the eyewitness in opposition of him or her, to have necessary process for gathering eyewitnesses in his or her support (1995-2011). Last, the Sixth Amendment affords and individual the right to have the aid of an attorney for his or her defense (1995-2011). The last statement of the Sixth Amendments establishes that every individual has a right to counsel from the very second he or she is placed in police confinement (2011).…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The most important source of law is the United States Constitution. The United States Constitution is the foundation of both federal and state laws. The United States Constitution also protects us the people, particularly the first ten amendments known as the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights was ratified on December 15, 1791. One amendment that I feel is most relevant today in criminal law is Amendment VI Right to Speedy Trial, Confrontation of Witnesses. According to (Mount, 2011) Amendment VI states “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence”. Tom Head wrote (Head, 2012) “The "speedy trial" clause is intended to prevent long-term incarceration and detention without trial--which amounts to a prison sentence without a guilty verdict”. If you were to prolong a trial, over time evidence can become lost, witnesses could and would forget facts, and an innocent person could end up doing time for a crime he did not commit. It is in the best interest of both the prosecution and the defense to have a speedy trial so that the proper facts and evidence can stay fresh. The right to a public trial assures the defendant that a fair hearing can take place. Allowing the public to view a trial helps reduce the risk of an unfair or a bias trial. An impartial jury of the state would be a jury that is not bias and comes from the state and district of which the crime took place. Head (Head, 2012) stated “Not only must jury members not have…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Zalman, M. (2008). Criminal procedure: Constitution and society, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Zalman, M. (2011). Criminal procedure: Constitution and society (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice-Hall.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jury Trial Analysis Paper

    • 1200 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The sixth amendment states that “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy trial.” (18 U.S.C. Sections 3161-3174). Still, it is important to note that the time limit for a speedy trial is not legally defined. In 1966 the Supreme Court address the matter of a “speedy trial”, and identified three advantages associated with the practice. First, it prevents excessive incarceration. Second, in minimizes anxiety suffered by the defendant. And lastly, in prevents damage to the case. A speedy trial also has advantages to the government. It assures guilty verdicts due to the minimized loss of evidence. It also keeps defendants from bailing out and committing more crimes.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    There have been differences between the two contrasting types of models for the criminal justice system. Both models see the Constitution for the basics of it, but neither model is free from error. There are a sparse attributes of the two models where they can…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Zalman, M. (2008). Criminal procedure: Constitution and society (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.…

    • 1777 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    6th Amendment guarantees you a speedy trail, an impartial jury, that the accused can comfort the witnesses against them, and must be allowed a…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court History and Purpose

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages

    People in the United States attend court every day for different many reasons. Those reasons could be for traffic violations, civil law suits, or for unlawful criminal acts. No matter what they are all handled and disputed in a court of law. Courts are empowered to make fair and binding decisions upon the facts that are received. There are two types of courts; civil court and criminal court. It is very important that people understand and know the differences between civil and criminal courts. Civil courts handle resolutions between private parties and usually consist of one party suing the other for some type of monetary damages. Criminal courts on the other hand, try alleged offenders for suspected crimes committed, whereas the end result is either freedom for the offender or a prison cell.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Del Carmen, R. V. (2010). Criminal procedure: Law and practice. (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage.…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays