Preview

Juror Three: The Antagonist Of Twelve Angry Men

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
258 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Juror Three: The Antagonist Of Twelve Angry Men
Generally speaking, an antagonist is a character in a literary work that opposes the protagonist, or chief character. The antagonist can be a person, animal, or force of nature, as long as it provides a source of conflict. Juror Eight could at first be viewed as the antagonist of Twelve Angry Men, because he opposes the votes of the other eleven jurors. However, as the story progresses, Juror Eight establishes reasonable doubt and is able to convince and win over more and more jurors. Eventually, the vote is eleven to one with the majority voting not guilty. Juror Three refuses to be swayed. Thus, he emerges as the main antagonist. I have several arguments on why I believe that Three is the antagonist. Early in the story, the author has given
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Quotes From The Protagonist In 'The Wizard Of Oz'
    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page

    Quotes From The Protagonist In 'The Wizard Of Oz'

    Antagonist-the main opponent of the protagonist. Readers hope the antagonist would defeat the protagonist. An example of an antagonist would be the wicked witch in The Wizard of Oz.…

    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Court Cases In Twelve Angry Men By Reginald Rose
    • 128 Words
    • 1 Page

    Court Cases In Twelve Angry Men By Reginald Rose

    Court cases sometimes have some controversy behind them, for example in the story, "Twelve Angry Men", Reginald Rose was trying…

    • 128 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Heroism In Terry And 8th Juror
    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page

    Heroism In Terry And 8th Juror

    When there is suppression and exploitation of voices, standing up to a group can prove to be difficult to the unrecognised heroes. Both Terry and 8th Juror, the protagonists in the texts experience self-doubt in their journey to heroism through daring actions that eventually getting them to success. Whilst the reader can identify the initial courage in 8th Juror voting ‘not guilty,’ against the opposing jurors and the majority bias, the reader can note through the stage directions his anxiousness leading up to revealing his vote “The 8th Juror turns, startled.” He’s logical sense came forward unlike the biased and lazy judgement of the other jurors. “There were eleven votes for “guilty.” It’s not easy for me to raise my hand and send a boy…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    12 Angry Men: Overview
    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages

    12 Angry Men: Overview

    4th Juror: 4th Juror is a stock broker. He seems very serious. He deals with the facts of the case logically and uses facts.…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Truth In The Jurors By Reginald Rose
    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Truth In The Jurors By Reginald Rose

    The writer, Reginald Rose wants to show to me from thus play is that the truth matters more. He wants to show that the truth what matter more because throughout the play the Jurors keep arguing that boy isn't innocent. Later on in the play the Jurors started to find reasonable doubt on the evidence they had on the boy. Like when one of the witnesses said that they say the killing accruing through the window when the train was passing by. It wasn't possible for her to the killing accruing because it was in the middle of the night and she didn't have her glasses on so it was impossible for her to see the boy killing his father through the last to carts windows of the train when passing. (Rose 15) Also when the boy was accused of murdering his…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Character Development In Juror's Twelve Angry Men
    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Character Development In Juror's Twelve Angry Men

    There are only twelve main characters in the entire play whose names we never learn. Despite that fact, there is a large amount of character development and the reader is able to learn lots about each juror. Character development is necessary for a good story and Twelve Angry Men has lots of it. It is all through the jurors dialogue and how they each act. The protagonist, juror 8, and the antagonist, juror 3, are easily identifiable thanks to how they talk about the case and what they want to happen. Juror 10 is clearly a racist based on the way he talks about “them”. As you can see, their names are not necessary for good characters and a good play. All that is…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Judicial System In Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men
    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Judicial System In Reginald Rose's Twelve Angry Men

    Like any piece of fiction, whether it be a short story, play, or possibly a novel, all are written with a specific purpose in mind. Usually, authors of fictional writing take entertainment into consideration when mapping out the subliminal purpose they intend to display for their audience. Reginald Rose, the author of Twelve Angry Men, could have written this play for multiple reasons. However, as a reader, it is critical to conclude that it was written for at least two solid purposes instead of assuming a vast assortment of insignificant reasons that may not make sense. In my opinion, Reginald Rose’s purpose for writing Twelve Angry Men was to portray that even in the judicial system, it is almost impossible to avoid the idea of mob mentality and bias because of personal experience and the prejudice of others.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    On The Waterfront Analysis
    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On The Waterfront Analysis

    In the two novels, there are also antagonist they are Johnny Friendly in ‘On the Waterfront’ and all the other jurors in ‘Twelve Angry Men’. Johnny Friendly runs society with everyone to scared…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of 12 Angry Men
    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Analysis Of 12 Angry Men

    For fans of courtroom dramas and crime television, these court case movies all revolve around the courtroom. Unlike the orderly process of a real courtroom, the stories are filled with drama, intrigue and corruption. Getting to the truth is seldom as straightforward as it appears within these hit movies.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    12 Angry Men Jury Duty
    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages

    12 Angry Men Jury Duty

    Everyone dreads Jury duty. Jury duty is commonly known as a nuisance that gets in the way of our everyday lives. When one types in the words “jury duty” into the google search bar that individual finds the first few search results to be “get out of jury duty” or “jury duty excuses”. However, we fail to realize that the role of a juror is essential to the United States justice system, we also fail to realize that every single juror counts. We often hear of jurors conforming, and switching their votes to the majority vote in hopes of going home, but this is not the case in “12 Angry Men”. In Sidney Lumet’s feature film “12 Angry Men”, we are given insight to the pressures of social psychology and how one man strives to overcome and change it.…

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jury Secrecy In 12 Angry Men
    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Jury Secrecy In 12 Angry Men

    Once the jury retire to the jury room to consider their verdict, the jurors are prohibited from communicating with anyone apart from the judge or an assigned court official. This goes on until the verdict has been delivered. Under s.8 of the Contempt of Court Act 1981, they are also forbidden from revealing information gathered during their deliberations. A breach of this section would amount to a criminal offence. It is argued that jury secrecy ensures freedom of discussion in the jury room, protects jurors from outside influences and from harassment and ensures the finality of the verdict. Without secrecy, citizens may be hesitant to serve as jurors. The arguments against secrecy include the fact that juries would be made more accountable, the reliability of convictions would be easier to inquire into and injustices would be easier to rectify, it will paint a clearer picture on where reform is required, it could educate the public as well as ensure each juror’s freedom of expression. A case that drew attention to the issue of jury secrecy would be the House of Lords’ case of R v Mirza where a juror writes to the court, after the trial, expressing their concern with how the verdict was reached. There was a suggestion that some of the jurors could be racist. The House of Lords took…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    12 men in the jury
    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages

    12 men in the jury

    I would have to say that it depends on the eye witness. A human being has been proven to sometimes see things that are not actually there and believe things that never happened. The emotions that we have make us susceptible to having our perceptions skewed and out senses tricked. There's also the issue of someone lying for personal gain. That being said, I wouldn't say that eye witness testimony isn't reliable, but it can't be seen as infallible and should be able to hold up to a certain amount of scrutiny.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Trail Of Tears Argumentative Essay
    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Trail Of Tears Argumentative Essay

    Everyone, no matter what age remembers their childhood and the “bad guys”, no matter what book, movie, or game there was an antagonist. There must be one, it’s a part of writing and storytelling, at the creation of woman and man, God made the Snake to trick Eve into eating the forbidden fruit of the tree. Most of the time, their name had the word “evil” in it, they were the antagonist for the good heroine to beat up and save the girl at the end of their story. However, the word “evil” has been generalized over the years, after being plastered on so many characters for so long. From the change of times, the situation that causes the word to be introduced into the conversation has changed also. We’ve gone through so many wars, genocides, and…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Allusions in Invisible Man
    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Allusions in Invisible Man

    antagonist; whether to act according to his feelings and instincts, or to try to follow the…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    To Kill A Mockingbird Jury Analysis
    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To Kill A Mockingbird Jury Analysis

    American novelist Harper Lee in her novel To Kill a Mockingbird wrote, “I'm no idealist to believe firmly in the integrity of our courts and in the jury system—that is no ideal to me, it is a living, working reality. Gentlemen, a court is no better than each man of you sitting before me on this jury. A court is only as sound as its jury, and a jury is only as sound as the men who make it up.” I had nervously opened the envelope with “Official Jury Summons” stamped on the outside many times before the autumn of 2014, however, up until that point, I had been lucky and avoided selection. My once thriving town was beginning to feel the consequences of a declining economy and increased poverty. My fellow citizens walked the streets with an almost…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics