Juror 10

Satisfactory Essays
Topics: Jury, Verdict, Not proven
Juror 10 There are two main characteristics of the 10th juror that influence his verdict. The first is that juror 10 is prejudiced against the defendant (most likely he is racist, but we can not be 100% sure). The second is that he is uncaring and impatient. The first time we get a glimpse of juror 10’s prejudice is on page 7 when he says “It’s the element. I’m telling you they let those kids run wild up there. Well, maybe it serves them right.” He believes that anyone coming from a poor neighborhood is less than human. We can see right from the start that the verdict that the defendant is undoubtedly ‘guilty’ is locked in his mind simply because he has a personal grudge against people like the defendant. Next, on page 10 and 14, he states “You can’t believe a word they say” and “The kids who crawl outa those places are real trash”. Clearly it can be seen that he has a certain unfounded prejudice towards the defendant, viewing him as a liar and a piece of trash, with no supporting evidence. This prejudice most surely influences his verdict of ‘guilty’ without view of any evidence. If that is not enough, starting on page 62 Juror 10 begins a speech lasting 2 pages in which he spews out his views of people like the defendant: “Human life doesn’t mean as much to them as it does to us…And they are-wild animals.” Juror 10 is an impatient and uncaring/unconcerned person. It is made clear by viewing his lines that Juror 10 does not take his part on the jury seriously and only wants to reach a consensus as quickly as possible. His reason is quickly found on page 22 when he states, “I got three garages of mine going to pot while your talking. Let’s get done and get outa here.” On page 34 he impatiently asks, “What’s the idea of wasting everybody’s time here?” Clearly he just wants to get back to his garages; he

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The Last Juror

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Last Juror by John Grisham 1. "From day one she was intimidated by me because I was from Memphis and had gone to school up North for five years. I was careful not to wear my Ivy Leagueness on my shoulder, but at the same time I wanted these rural Mississippians to know that I had been superbly educated. (page 10)" There are two literary elements that could be categorized in this excerpt. I think that John Grisham highlights his use of satire very vividly early on in the book. He is placing…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Phuc Nguyen Professor Elizabeth Curry Final Draft Compare Juror #8 and Juror #3 One of the top one hundred movies of all time according to the American Film Institute (number 87 to be exact), “12 Angry Men”, a play written by Reginald Rose, is considered a household classic today and the definition of a quality movie. Unlike many of the movies today, 12 Angry Men doesn’t use vulgar language, have raunchy sex scenes, or any type of real violence throughout the movie, but yet it is still considered…

    • 2386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jury and Angriest Juror

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Karim Zaky 1 Mrs. Lambert English II 12/20/2012 Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose explored the theme ‘Power of persuasion’ through jurors’ # Three, Eight, and Nine. The play is inspired by Reginald Rose’s own experience of jury duty on a manslaughter case in New York City. Reginald Rose was born in New York City on December 10, 1920 and he worked at a series of odd jobs, including a receiving clerk, window cleaner, and camp counselor He served in the U.S. Army in World War II, completing…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    as discussions about the innocence of a young boy are decided. The dark and foreboding storm clouds that hang over the heads of the jurors are beginning to lift as time progresses and new facts are presented. The two men that cannot put their personal emotions aside are juror 3 and juror 10. These men are motivated by their emotions rather than the evidence. Juror 3 is a strong, forceful man who refuses to alter his vote. Being very opinionated, he looks at the evidence “you sat right there in court…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Right To Twelve Jurors

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages

    require twelve jurors. However, under special circumstances, twelve jurors are not always required to make a decision. These special circumstances are granted by the judge that is assigned to the case and he or she can decide whether or not fewer than twelve jurors are appropriate for a given situation. That being said, there are some instances in which fewer than twelve jurors are needed to make a decision. For example, when making a unanimous decision within the federal court, eleven jurors can make…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mock Juror Essay

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Even though race salience in an influential variable for juror and racial bias, it seems unclear on how jurors prejudges the defendants to actually determine the sentencing and the verdict. The next article discusses on how pretrial information can make a huge difference in a mock juror’s sentencing. However, depending on the pretrial restrictions on the media, the pretrial publicity (PTP) may reach potential jurors, which may affect the jurors’ ability to objectively assess the evidence in the trial…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    deliberation was the high school football coach, juror number one. He tries to keep order in the hostile jury room. The role evolve to the Architect in the course of the film because he was the only odd ball in the room who vote not guilty and he manage to change everyone vote by the end of the film. His successful strategies for leading the group include encouraging equal and inclusive participation and taking time to deliberate slowly. 2. Why do jurors listen to the Architect? He is the lone dissenter…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Comparison essay comparing Juror 3 and Juror 8 What are some similarities between Jurors 3 and 8? What about differences? Oh gosh, it's been years since I've seen the movie (didn't read the play). Okay, Juror #3 is the angry father, and Juror #8 is the guy who stands alone in the INNOCENT vote, right? I suspect the similarities are easier to find by reading the play because the movie really shows their contrasts. There is one similarity in that when they really believe something, they…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Differences and similarities I and juror 9 have! The play twelve angry men analyzing the significance of identifying character traits. A character who is like me is juror 9 because he’s open minded and fair. Juror 9 is trying to give good evidence about the old men, for example, “The old men has never been recognized his whole life he just wants to be recognized.” (pg. 36) I display this characteristic because I could tell fake from fake and real from real like juror 9 did with the old man when he could…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do Jurors Deliver Justice

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Do jurors deliver justice? The professional judges and jurors, constituting a committee, personify themselves two various springs, pursuing one aim: an impartial and an objective adjudication and rendering a fair verdict. However, a judge embodies the judicial tradition, power, professional knowledge and gathered experience, while the jurors contribute to a trial a sense of public conscience, which is strictly contained in the mind of fellow citizens, which at times have a diverse idea of justice…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays