Preview

Jurisdiction in International Law

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
623 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Jurisdiction in International Law
Jurisdictional Issues In International Law

INTRODUCTION

Jurisdiction is the practical authority granted to a formally constituted legal body or to a political le adder to deal with and make pronouncements on legal matters and, by implication, to administer justice within a defined area of responsibility.
International law is the set of rules generally regarded and accepted as binding in relations between states and nations. It serves as a framework for the practice of stable and organized international relations.

Jurisdiction becomes a concern of international law when a State, in its eagerness to promote its sovereign interests abroad, adopts laws that govern matters of not purely domestic concern. The international law of jurisdiction is sometimes referred to as the law of ‘extra- territorial’ jurisdiction, especially in the field of economic law. The use of the term ‘extraterritoriality’ derives from the observation that jurisdiction becomes a concern of international law where a State regulates matters which are not exclusively of domestic concern. The term ‘extraterritorial jurisdiction’ is only accurate if it refers to assertions of jurisdiction over persons, property, or activities, which have no territorial nexus whatsoever with the regulating State.

EXTRA-TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION
Extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) is the legal ability of a government to exercise authority beyond its normal boundaries and it may also refers to a court’s ability to exercise power beyond its territorial limits. For example, long arm jurisdiction. Long-Arm Statute is a legal provision that allows a state to exercise jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant, provided that the prospective defendant has sufficient minimum contacts with the forum state.

JURISDICTION UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW: PRINCIPLES
There are five general doctrines authorizing the exercise of jurisdiction under international law. States can exercise prescriptive jurisdiction under

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Jurisdiction refers to a court’s authority and right to speak the law or render a decision in a legal dispute. According to The legal environment of business: A managerial approach: Theory to practice, jurisdiction can be described as, is a court’s authority to decide a particular case based on (1) who the parties are, and (2) the subject matter of the dispute” (Melvin, 2012, p.58).…

    • 1577 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal jurisdiction and civil jurisdiction brings about the protective jurisdiction of courts. They necessitate the occasions for instituting the proceedings. Further criminal and civil jurisdiction therefore implies with respect to the mature of the subject matter and civil or criminal mature of the actions. Such an action therefore does not aim in the creation of another authority. Territorial aspects may come in hand, however the nature of the action determines the jurisdiction the case will be handled. It merely extends the limits of the particular jurisdiction. It is therefore not mandatory.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Under the minimum contacts test, the court may exercise jurisdiction either specifically or generally. Specific jurisdiction takes place when an isolated act has occurred, giving jurisdiction over that act only. However, if the defendant has many contacts and activities within the state, he can be sued over any and all…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to international law there are two form of law, in which they both have a legal dispute when it is brought by individual countries; the two may give an advisory opinion on any legal question that is referred to it by authorized international agencies.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    EuroTermsCh25

    • 691 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. Extraterritoriality: the state of being exempt from the jurisdiction of local law. This occurred in China in treaty ports where foreigners were exempted from Chinese law enforcement and could only be judged by officials of their own countries. This example of extraterritoriality represented a distrust of Chinese legal procedures and a cultural arrogance on the superiority of Western institutions.…

    • 691 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    LAW201 Final

    • 2507 Words
    • 7 Pages

    "Jurisdiction." West 's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. 2008. The Gale Group 12 Nov. 2012 http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/jurisdiction…

    • 2507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The authority of a court to hear and decide cases is called the jurisdiction. When a case is first brought to court is the authority of the original jurisdiction. When there is an error of law and the courts need to review the case, they will go to the appellate jurisdiction. When the court has the power to hear any case, this is called general jurisdiction. Special jurisdiction is where the court has the authority to hear exceptional circumstances. A particular…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The international principle of law that holds that governments have the right to rule themselves as they see fit is known as____…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alien Tort Statute (ATS)

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Court has since stated that the ATS provides “a cause of action for [a] modest number of international law violations.” To discern if a modern offense also violates the law of nations, which is also known as customary international law, courts will examine whether the offense “rest[s] on a norm of international character accepted by the civilized world and defined with specificity comparable to the features of the 18th century paradigms.” Further, a customary norm should be “specific, universal, and…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of the most essential inquiries of law is whether a particular court has authority to preside over a given case. The jurisdictional question may be broken down into three components: is jurisdiction over the person, is jurisdiction over the subject matter, and is jurisdiction to render the particular judgment sought. Then there is different courts that have jurisdiction depending on the case. State courts have general jurisdiction, meaning that they can hear any controversy except those prohibited by their specific state laws.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jurisdiction is defined in our textbooks, as “The legal authority or power to create and enforce laws within a particular area” (Wright, 2012).…

    • 1226 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I frequently read newspapers as I see it as a priority to keep up to date with the latest headlines around the world. I find it particularly interesting how International law differs from English law and I am keen to gain a better understanding of how the law shapes and influences international…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This means that no authority is legally above the state. The states are not obliged to agree to the international law and apply it within their state because of state sovereignty. This may be a reason in which why torture still exists in the world today as it has not been entirely abolished because some states have not agreed to apply the international laws dealing with torture within their state e.g. UNCAT where some states have both signed and ratified the convention, states have signed but not ratified and other states which have not signed nor ratified the covenant such as Papua New Guinea, Angola, Zimbabwe and Iran where torture is known to still occur today. As long as state sovereignty applies the nation state cannot have any external interference and therefore cannot be influenced as to whether the nation state should apply the international law into their state or not. This limits international law from becoming affective into the nation…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jurisdiction can be used in many different ways, depending on the circumstances. It can be most basically defined as the official power to make legal decisions and judgments. Federal and state laws can limit and grant the courts jurisdiction. In order for a court's decision to be a legally valid one, it must have two types of jurisdiction: personal jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction. Personal jurisdiction rules determine whether a court has power over a particular defendant, you can't just sue someone in your home state if the defendant doesn't live in your state, has never been in your state, and doesn't do business in your state. Where subject matter jurisdiction is the authority of a court to hear cases of a particular type or cases relating to a…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ellasaurus Products

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Subject-matter jurisdiction is a court's authority to decide a particular type of dispute. For example, in the United States, federal court’s have subject-matter jurisdiction over issues governed by federal law( such as bankruptcy,copyright, patent, and federal tax matters) and state of courts have subject matter jurisdiction isues governed by state laws (such as professional liscencing and state tax matters.’;;…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays